Article Figures & Data
Figures
- FIGURE 1.
Schematic of traditional approach to program review.
- FIGURE 2.
Current course structure for bachelor of medical radiation science (nuclear medicine), with boldface text indicating courses that are unique to the nuclear medicine specialization and the remaining courses being common to radiography, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy students. Four subjects per session, with students completing 2 sessions per year, is considered a full-time load.
- FIGURE 3.
Schematic of reimagined approach to program review.
- FIGURE 4.
Hybridized cognitive/knowledge domain matrix used for knowledge and capability mapping, with diagonal arrow representing direction of scaffolding through program (4–6).
- FIGURE 5.
Proposed course structure of bachelor of medical radiation science (nuclear medicine and molecular imaging), with boldface text indicating courses that are unique to the nuclear medicine specialization and the remaining courses being common to radiography, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy students. Four subjects per session, with single subjects typically requiring 120–160 h of class time and double subjects twice that, is considered a full-time load.
Tables
- TABLE 1
Example Verbs for Cognitive Processes from Lower Order (Left) to Higher Order (Right) (4,6)
Remember Understand Apply Analyze Evaluate Create Recall Explain Implement Distinguish Critique Plan Recognize Interpret Use Differentiate Judge Generate Identify Classify Execute Organize Check Produce Summarize Deconstruct Detect Construct Infer Engineer Compare - TABLE 2
Knowledge Domain with Scaffolding from Concrete Knowledge (Left) to Abstract Knowledge (Right) (4,6)
Factual Conceptual Procedural Metacognitive Basic elements Interrelationship between elements Accomplishment of something using elements and interrelationships Cognition and self-cognition - TABLE 3
Example of Learning-Outcome Structure When New Content Driven by AHPRA Capabilities Is Introduced to Program
Parameter Description Learning outcome Interpret and critically evaluate clinical problems and evidence/information needs; identify, assess, critically evaluate, and apply appropriate and credible resources to reach solution Interpret and apply clinical reasoning and reflection to identify clinical problems and potential solutions; infer implications for clinical practice; plan and revise necessary actions or protocol changes Recognize and explain principles and applications of pharmaceuticals in clinical practice; describe risks, precautions, and contraindications associated with pharmaceutical use Recognize, describe, and apply principles and procedures to deliver pharmaceuticals safely and correctly in clinical practice Explain and apply pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles to pharmaceuticals used in clinical practice and to adverse reactions and interactions Understand and implement effective and respectful working relationships Demonstrate critical, analytic, and reflective skills in contexts such as clinical problem solving, research and empiric practice, and academic and professional discourse Identify and apply effective communication skills in a variety of settings using a variety of media Assessment Complete written assignment as a group (domain 3 linked to domain 5.8) (group task, 20% of grade; individual reflection, 5% of grade) Complete calculation examination online (25% of grade) Complete final examination (50% of grade) Curriculum Module 1, principles Pharmacology (2 wk) Pharmacodynamics (2 wk) Pharmacokinetics (2 wk) Module 2, application Interventional medications (2 wk) Crash cart (1 wk) Adjunctive medications (1 wk) OTC medications in medical radiation science (1 wk) Radiopharmaceuticals and contrast (1 wk) Subject Pharmacology for medical radiation science
Supplemental Data
Files in this Data Supplement:
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.