Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
OtherDEPARTMENTS

ICANL Report

Tamara A. Sloper
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology June 2010, 38 (2) 9A-10A;
Tamara A. Sloper
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

Tamara A. Sloper Intersocietal Accreditation Commission

As an accreditation organization, ICANL is expected to maintain a program that balances the changing needs of both the nuclear medicine/nuclear cardiology/PET imaging community and the general public by improving the quality of patient care. The ICANL Standards are the foundation of that commitment. Composed by physician-, nuclear medicine technologist–, and physicist-sponsoring organization representatives on the ICANL board of directors, including representatives of the SNMTS, the standards are critically reviewed and revised every 2 years.

The latest version, published in 2010, are available for review and download from the ICANL Web site. The new guidelines become effective July 1, 2010. Applicant laboratories will benefit from the enhanced clarity and more inclusive nature of the 2010 version. Most of the changes clarify or explain the previous standards. There are several areas in which the guidelines are now more relaxed. The 2010 version has 5 areas of significant change:

TECHNICAL DIRECTOR REQUIREMENTS

Although specific pathways for documentation of the training and experience necessary remain defined; the laboratory's technical director is no longer required to have 3 years of clinical experience in nuclear medicine.

STRESS TEST SUPERVISION

The standards now specify that all personnel directly supervising stress procedures must have appropriate training or experience. Although a physician presence during stress testing is not required, the facility must ensure that appropriate staff is present, based upon the type of procedure being performed and the patient's risk of adverse events. If a nonphysician (e.g., properly trained nurse, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, exercise physiologist, or technologist) practicing under the physician's license is supervising the stress test, the medical director or physician director of the stress laboratory must attest in writing to the appropriate training and competence of the practitioner as outlined in the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Competence Statement on Stress Testing. In addition, at least 2 qualified individuals are required to be in attendance at the time of radionuclide injection during stress testing (e.g., the person supervising the stress test and the person authorized to inject the radionuclide). The ICANL Standards state that it is preferable for 2 individuals to be in attendance during the entire stress test.

QUALITY CONTROL OF IMAGING AND NONIMAGING EQUIPMENT

The guidelines have been enhanced regarding quality control of imaging and nonimaging equipment. An annual review of quality control protocols is now required. Quality control protocols must include items such as acceptable range or tolerance limits and actions for out-of-tolerance results, as well as instructions for record retention. In addition, the 2010 version of the ICANL Standards now mandate specific documentation of each quality control test performed (i.e., the type of test performed; the date and time of the test; identification of the device tested; the make, model and serial number of any reference sources used; the results of the test; a notation of whether the result was acceptable; and the signature or initials of the individual performing the test).

APPROPRIATE-USE CRITERIA

Appropriate-use criteria are now incorporated as a new section within the ICANL Standards. As part of the laboratory's ongoing quality improvement program, facilities providing nuclear cardiology and cardiac PET imaging are required to measure the appropriate use of radionuclide testing, based upon criteria published or endorsed by professional medical organizations. All other areas of nuclear medicine are encouraged to measure appropriate use as criteria become established and published by the relevant professional medical organizations. The 2010 version specifies that appropriate use must be measured in consecutive (e.g., 2- to 3-week) time periods so that 5% of the annual volume of patients referred for radionuclide testing is evaluated. For smaller-volume laboratories, a minimum of 30 patients must be evaluated. In addition, the overall results must be documented. The percentage of appropriate, inappropriate, and uncertain indications for testing must be measured. The laboratory's development of a program for education and reporting is required and must include patterns of adherence to appropriate-use criteria, baseline rates of adherence, goals for improvement of adherence to appropriate-use criteria, measurement of improvement rate, and confidential comparison reports on patterns of adherence in aggregate by the ordering physician, ordering practice, and interpreting practice. New information on appropriate-use criteria and the new FOCUS community hosted by the American College of Cardiology is available on the ICANL Web site.

EMERGING-TECHNOLOGIES PATHWAY

In 2009, ICANL incorporated a pathway for the acceptance of applications submitted by laboratories utilizing new technologies and other novel imaging approaches not included within the guidelines published by professional societies. The 2010 ICANL Standards reflect the requirement in place for laboratories using standard imaging equipment but utilizing imaging reconstruction algorithms not currently incorporated in the published imaging guidelines (e.g., half-time), as well as laboratories using new hardware technology with Food and Drug Administration 510K clearance that is not incorporated into professional organization guidelines. These laboratories are required to perform a physiologic patient simulator study to determine defect and image reproducibility using the laboratory's actual imaging parameters. In addition, requirements exist related to demonstration of compliance with manufacturers' recommended quality control through the submission of the results of quality control testing. Documentation of adequate training and competency of the technical staff, relevant to the new technology, is also required. For the purpose of accreditation, once a new technology is incorporated into the published professional guidelines, laboratories using the technology will no longer be required to perform physiologic patient simulator studies.

ICANL strives to publish standards that facilitate continuous improvement of the quality of care provided in nuclear medicine, nuclear cardiology, and PET imaging laboratories and looks forward to guiding laboratories toward compliance. Free live webinars summarizing the 2010 ICANL Standards were presented in April and May. For help or more information regarding the revised document or the accreditation process in general, please contact the ICANL staff (800-838-2110) or visit the ICANL Web site (www.icanl.org).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 38 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 38, Issue 2
June 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
ICANL Report
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
ICANL Report
Tamara A. Sloper
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2010, 38 (2) 9A-10A;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
ICANL Report
Tamara A. Sloper
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2010, 38 (2) 9A-10A;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • TECHNICAL DIRECTOR REQUIREMENTS
    • STRESS TEST SUPERVISION
    • QUALITY CONTROL OF IMAGING AND NONIMAGING EQUIPMENT
    • APPROPRIATE-USE CRITERIA
    • EMERGING-TECHNOLOGIES PATHWAY
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Technologist News
  • Moving into 2024 and Our Future
  • Outstanding JNMT Articles for 2022
Show more DEPARTMENTS

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire