Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
OtherDEPARTMENTS

REPLY:

Asit K. Paul and Hani A. Nabi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology December 2005, 33 (4) 244;
Asit K. Paul
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hani A. Nabi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

We thank Currie and Wheat for their comments on our article (1). We are aware of the variations in acquisition protocols for gated myocardial perfusion SPECT among different centers. There is a recommendation, but no clear consensus, on this matter (2). In some instances, potentially better techniques and protocols have been described in the literature. These either are not routinely available in commercial systems or have yet to be adequately validated in clinical settings. For the sake of brevity, detailed discussion of all the techniques was beyond the scope of our article. We principally focused on the techniques that are widely accepted and routinely used in clinical practice. We appreciate Currie and Wheat’s comments and consider them a valuable adjunct to our article.

In our article, we did not recommend any particular protocol, technique, or processing program. Rather, we emphasized general principles. The protocols were cited strictly as examples. In our experience, the clinical consequence of a narrow window on perfusion data acquisition is not significant if the subject is on sinus rhythm or not severely arrhythmic. If all subjects are routinely gated, a wider window is certainly a better approach, because with a narrow window, a greater number of beats will be rejected in arrhythmic patients. However, even a 100% window does not include all the beats, because only beats within ±50% of the expected R-R interval will be accepted. The suggestion of an additional bin is an attractive alternative to maintain the integrity of the perfusion data (3).

Our comment that a narrow window will prolong the image acquisition was based on the count-based acquisition mode. Because the beat rejection rate is high in arrhythmic patients, acquisition has to be prolonged—too long, in some cases, to collect the desired counts. In fact, whatever the acquisition strategy is, the question as mentioned by Currie and Wheat still remains: Can we completely eliminate the interprojection nonuniformity of the counts, time, or number of beats? If one variable is kept fixed during the acquisition, the potential for variation in other variables persists. For practical purposes, we consider this variation acceptable except in patients with significant arrhythmia. However, to expand the application of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT in a wider spectrum of patients, a better strategy is clearly needed.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Paul AK, Nabi HA. Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: basic principles, technical aspects, and clinical applications. J Nucl Med Technol. 2004;32:179–187.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures: part 2. J Nucl Cardiol. 1999;6:G53–G83.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    Germano G, Berman DS. Acquisition and processing for gated perfusion SPECT: technical aspects. In. Germano G, Berman DS, eds. Clinical Gated Cardiac SPECT. Armonk, NY: Futura Publishing;1999:93–113.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 33 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 33, Issue 4
December 1, 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
REPLY:
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
REPLY:
Asit K. Paul, Hani A. Nabi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2005, 33 (4) 244;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
REPLY:
Asit K. Paul, Hani A. Nabi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2005, 33 (4) 244;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Outstanding JNMT Articles for 2022
  • Technologist News
  • Moving into 2024 and Our Future
Show more Letter to the Editor

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire