Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
OtherCONTINUING EDUCATION

18F-FDG Imaging: Pitfalls and Artifacts

Mohei M. Abouzied, Elpida S. Crawford and Hani Abdel Nabi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology September 2005, 33 (3) 145-155;
Mohei M. Abouzied
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elpida S. Crawford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hani Abdel Nabi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Asymmetric salivary gland uptake (projection view). Note increased 18F-FDG uptake in right face/salivary gland and region (arrow) as compared with contralateral side. Patient’s head moved during acquisition. SUV = standardized uptake value.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Symmetric salivary gland uptake (projection view; arrows) shows mild uptake.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Laryngeal uptake. (A) Normal symmetric uptake in larynx. (B) Focal unilateral (arrows). Coronal view on left; transaxial view on right.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Thyroid inflammation. (A) Patient with known squamous cell carcinoma of upper lobe of right lung (thick arrow) who was being evaluated for initial staging. Note intense thyroid uptake due to Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Also note normal stomach uptake (thin arrow). (B) A 57-y-old woman with history of breast carcinoma and left thyroidectomy who was being evaluated because of rising levels of tumor markers. Neck uptake was due to Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, which could easily have been mistaken for nodal uptake. C = coronal.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Focal thyroid uptake. (A) Focal thyroid uptake seen in right lobe of thyroid gland corresponding to focal density (arrow) seen on CT scan (B). ANT = anterior; POS = posterior; C = coronal.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    (A) Cardiac uptake: Normal physiologic intense 18F-FDG uptake throughout myocardium. (B) Atrial uptake: Note inhomogeneous mild 18F-FDG uptake in enlarged right atrium resembling abnormal mediastinal nodal tissue uptake. Thick arrow points out normal stomach uptake. (C) Cardiac uptake: Apical scar with aneurismal formation.

  • FIGURE 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7.

    Stomach uptake. (A) Normal uptake: mild diffuse uptake (arrows) conforming to stomach configuration. (B) Adenocarcinoma of stomach: focal uptake in region of stomach. Coronal view on left; sagittal view on right. (C) Stomach lymphoma: intense focal uptake (arrows). S = sagittal; C = coronal; ANT = anterior; POS = posterior.

  • FIGURE 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 8.

    Dilated esophagus. A 72-y-old man with known esophageal carcinoma. Note dilated esophagus with linear increased uptake on both sides. Chronic dilation is due to distal obstruction by tumor mass. Linear uptake is due to reactive inflammation. ANT = anterior; POS = posterior; S = sagittal; C = coronal.

  • FIGURE 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 9.

    Esophageal uptake. Esophageal uptake in patient with gastroesophageal reflux disease. S = sagittal; C = coronal; ANT = anterior; POS = posterior.

  • FIGURE 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 10.

    Colonic activity (projection view). Patient had bladder cancer, status post cystostomy, and ileal conduit. PET was done to rule out pelvic recurrence. Note nonspecific diffuse colonic activity (a), ileal conduit (b), urinary bag (c), and area of recurrence (d).

  • FIGURE 11.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 11.

    Cecal uptake. (A and B) Normal diffuse physiologic uptake (arrow) in cecum. C = coronal.

  • FIGURE 12.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 12.

    Dilated urinary bladder. Note prominent right (Rt) kidney collecting system, right ureter, and dilated urinary bladder.

  • FIGURE 13.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 13.

    Horseshoe kidney. (A) Horseshoe kidney (arrow) seen on 18F-FDG PET scan (projection view on left). Patient with Hodgkin’s lymphoma. (B) 99mTc-Glucoheptonate scan confirms presence of horseshoe kidney.

  • FIGURE 14.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 14.

    Renal activity. (A) Intense activity in right kidney collecting system overlapping right lobe of liver, simulating a liver lesion. (B) 99mTc-Dimercaptosuccinic acid image of same patient confirms that right kidney is slightly higher than left. Post = posterior.

  • FIGURE 15.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 15.

    Bladder diverticulum. (A) Bladder diverticulum caused by chronic bladder outlet obstruction by hypertrophied prostate. (B) Corresponding CT scan. ANT = anterior; POST = posterior; S = sagittal; C = coronal.

  • FIGURE 16.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 16.

    (A) Nephrostomy tube (arrow). (B) Diaper artifact. POS = posterior.

  • FIGURE 17.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 17.

    Muscle uptake. Symmetric muscle uptake in neck (arrows). C= coronal.

  • FIGURE 18.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 18.

    Intercostal muscle uptake due to persistent coughing (projection view).

  • FIGURE 19.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 19.

    Brown fat uptake. (A) Asymmetric neck uptake (arrows). (B) Intense symmetric uptake in adipose tissue (arrows). Brown fat can cause difficulty in scan interpretation. C = coronal.

  • FIGURE 20.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 20.

    Thymus uptake (coronal views). (A) Diffuse thymus uptake (arrow). (B) Focal thymus uptake (arrow).

  • FIGURE 21.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 21.

    Bone marrow. Intense 18F-FDG uptake in bone marrow is attributed to hematopoietic growth factor.

  • FIGURE 22.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 22.

    Spleen uptake (arrows) due to hematopoietic growth factor.

  • FIGURE 23.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 23.

    18F-FDG uptake in lymph nodes attributed to tuberculosis (projection view).

  • FIGURE 24.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 24.

    Fungal infection in liver of pediatric patient. (A) Before therapy (arrow). (B) Infection resolved on image after specific antifungal therapy.

  • FIGURE 25.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 25.

    Scar tissue from recent surgery. Patient underwent recent abdominal surgery for hernia repair. Note linear superficial increased 18F-FDG uptake along anterior abdominal wall conforming to abdominal scar tissue (arrow). S = sagittal; C = coronal; ANT = anterior; POS = posterior.

  • FIGURE 26.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 26.

    Abdominal fibrosis, honeycomb appearance. Patient had history of multiple abdominal surgeries leading to scattered segmental fibrosis. Image shows mild 18F-FDG uptake between dilated loops of bowel forming the honeycomb appearance. C = coronal.

  • FIGURE 27.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 27.

    Uptake in sternum after coronary artery bypass grafting. Patient had open-heart surgery 1 wk before 18F-FDG study. S = sagittal; C = coronal.

  • FIGURE 28.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 28.

    Postsurgical hematoma (arrows). Patient had excisional breast biopsy 10 d before 18F-FDG scan. ANT = anterior; POS = posterior; S = sagittal; C = coronal.

  • FIGURE 29.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 29.

    Intense aortic uptake due to inflammation (unstable plaque formation).

  • FIGURE 30.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 30.

    Breast uptake, lactating female. ANT = anterior; POS = posterior; C = coronal.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Patient Preparation

    1. Fasting—nothing by mouth for 4–6 h

    2. No strenuous exercise 24 h before PET

    3. Check blood glucose level (ideally between 120 and 150 mg/dL)

    4. Start intravenous line for 18F-FDG administration

    5. During circulation time, the patient should rest on a cart or recliner

    6. Patient should void before scanning

    7. Remove any metallic objects

    8. Make the patient comfortable under the scanner—that is, use head and arm support

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Relevant Patient History and Data

    • Surgical history: type, site, date of previous surgery or biopsy, site and types of stomas if present

    • Clinical history: complaints, type and site of tumor, date of diagnosis

    • Current therapy: chemo/radiotherapy, bone marrow-stimulating factors—for example, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

    • Previous therapy received

    • History of trauma or recent falls

    • Results of previous radiologic investigations; review the patient’s film (CT, MRI, and so forth)

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 33 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 33, Issue 3
September 1, 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
18F-FDG Imaging: Pitfalls and Artifacts
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
18F-FDG Imaging: Pitfalls and Artifacts
Mohei M. Abouzied, Elpida S. Crawford, Hani Abdel Nabi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2005, 33 (3) 145-155;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
18F-FDG Imaging: Pitfalls and Artifacts
Mohei M. Abouzied, Elpida S. Crawford, Hani Abdel Nabi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2005, 33 (3) 145-155;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • HEAD AND NECK
    • MYOCARDIUM
    • GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
    • GENITOURINARY
    • MUSCULAR ACTIVITY
    • THYMUS UPTAKE
    • BONE MARROW
    • SPLENIC UPTAKE
    • BENIGN PATHOLOGIC CAUSES OF 18F-FDG UPTAKE
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Noninvasive brain cancer imaging with a bispecific antibody fragment, generated via click chemistry
  • Stratification of 18F-Labeled PET Imaging Agents for the Assessment of Antiangiogenic Therapy Responses in Tumors
  • Multimodal Assessment of In Vivo Metabolism with Hyperpolarized [1-13C]MR Spectroscopy and 18F-FDG PET Imaging in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumor-Bearing Rats
  • Could Different Hydration Protocols Affect the Quality of 18F-FDG PET/CT Images?
  • Assessment of a New 18F-FDG PET/CT Protocol in the Staging of Oral Cavity Carcinomas
  • Uncommon Reason for High Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Uptake
  • A "fat chance" it's malignant: lipoid pneumonia simulating lung cancer on PET scan
  • Pediatric PET/CT Imaging: Tips and Techniques
  • A "fat chance" it's malignant: lipoid pneumonia simulating lung cancer on PET scan
  • Forced Diuresis Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET in Abdominopelvic Malignancies
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Illuminating the Hidden: Standardizing Cardiac MIBG Imaging for Sympathetic Dysfunction
  • PET/CT Case Series: Unmasking the Mystery of Cardiac Sarcoidosis
  • Delivery Methods of Radiopharmaceuticals: Exploring Global Strategies to Minimize Occupational Radiation Exposure
Show more Continuing Education

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire