Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Commentary

Cost-Effectiveness of Thallium-201 versus Technetium-99m-Sestamibi in the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease

Brian Nightengale
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology March 1995, 23 (1) 36-41;
Brian Nightengale
Pharmacy Administration, College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives: The purposes of this study were to demonstrate the applicability of pharmacoeconomic principles in the nuclear medicine market and to compare the cost effectiveness of 201TI and 99mTc-sestamibi.

Methods: Cost information was obtained from a South Carolina hospital. Effectiveness data were obtained from the literature.

Results: This research showed that when 201TI was used either one day before or on the day of calibration it was more cost-effective than 99mTc-sestamibi for the detection of coronary artery disease; especially when cardiac scheduling was light. This conclusion held for several varying scenarios. Technetium-99m-sestamibi was more cost-effective than 201TI in the scenarios where patient scheduling was heavy and the 201TI was used three days post-calibration.

Conclusion: Although the generalizability of these results is strictly limited, this research demonstrates the applicability of pharmacoeconomics to radiopharmaceuticals. These results provide some insight into the efficient use of cardiac imaging agents.

  • cost-effectiveness
  • 99mTc-sestamibi
  • 201TI
  • pharmacoeconomics
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 23 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 23, Issue 1
March 1, 1995
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cost-Effectiveness of Thallium-201 versus Technetium-99m-Sestamibi in the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Cost-Effectiveness of Thallium-201 versus Technetium-99m-Sestamibi in the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease
Brian Nightengale
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 1995, 23 (1) 36-41;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cost-Effectiveness of Thallium-201 versus Technetium-99m-Sestamibi in the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease
Brian Nightengale
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 1995, 23 (1) 36-41;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Future of Nuclear Medicine Technology: Are We Ready for Advanced Practice?
  • Radiation Safety When a Patient Dies After Therapy
  • Dichotomous Thinking in Nuclear Medicine Technology
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • cost-effectiveness
  • 99mTc-sestamibi
  • 201TI
  • pharmacoeconomics
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire