Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Radiopharmacy

Adjustment to Radionuclide Angiogram Dose Based upon Patient’s Physical Parameters

Robert B. Glynn, Lynne G. Narveson, Joseph C. Hung and Raymond J. Gibbons
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology March 1994, 22 (1) 17-20;
Robert B. Glynn
Nuclear Medicine, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lynne G. Narveson
Nuclear Medicine, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph C. Hung
Nuclear Medicine, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raymond J. Gibbons
Nuclear Medicine, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective: The standard 30-mCi technetium-99m (99mTc) equilibrium radionuclide angiogram (RNA) dose for evaluating cardiac function has long been a problem in two respects: (1) unnecessarily high doses in smaller patients and (2) poor count statistics in larger patients. To rectify these problems, a dose chart was created based on height, weight, and gender to assist in the dispensing of an appropriate RNA dose.

Methods: The chart created is based on the 1983 Metropolitan Weight & Height Tables, which state the normal ranges of weight for men and women according to their respective heights. The 30-mCi dose was used for this normal range, and 1 mCi was added or subtracted for every 10-pound deviation from this range. We prospectively applied our chart to 91 patients and calculated the counts/pixel within the left ventricular region. The study group was divided into three groups: (Group A) patients who received 30 mCi (52 ± 11 counts/pixel, n = 32), (Group B) patients who received less than 30 mCi (56 ± 8 counts/pixel, n = 28), and (Group C) patients who received greater than 30 mCi (54 ± 12 counts/pixel, n = 31). We retrospectively identified 12 patients (Group D) who received the standard 30-mCi dose, but would have received a reduced dose if our chart had been used.

Results: There was no significant difference (p = 0.22) in counts/pixel among these three groups despite a very significant difference (p = 0.001) in weight. Image quality remained consistently good throughout the study. In contrast, Group D had significantly higher counts per pixel (78 ± 17 counts/pixel, p = 0.001) when compared to the other groups, indicating a need for dose reduction.

Conclusions: These data clearly demonstrate that dosage adjustment by our chart avoided excess radiation in thin patients and ensured adequate counting statistics in heavy patients.

  • Radionuclide angiogram dose (RNA)
  • dose chart
  • dose adjustment by weight
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 22 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 22, Issue 1
March 1, 1994
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Adjustment to Radionuclide Angiogram Dose Based upon Patient’s Physical Parameters
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Adjustment to Radionuclide Angiogram Dose Based upon Patient’s Physical Parameters
Robert B. Glynn, Lynne G. Narveson, Joseph C. Hung, Raymond J. Gibbons
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 1994, 22 (1) 17-20;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Adjustment to Radionuclide Angiogram Dose Based upon Patient’s Physical Parameters
Robert B. Glynn, Lynne G. Narveson, Joseph C. Hung, Raymond J. Gibbons
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 1994, 22 (1) 17-20;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Miniaturized Radiochemical Purity Testing for 99mTc-HMPAO, 99mTc-HMDP, and 99mTc-Tetrofosmin
  • Changes in Patterns of 99mTc-Macroaggregated Albumin Use Between 2000 and 2015
  • Absorbed Radiation Doses to Staff After Implementation of a Radiopharmacy Clean Room
Show more Radiopharmacy

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Radionuclide angiogram dose (RNA)
  • dose chart
  • dose adjustment by weight
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire