Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Commentary

We Are What We Think We Are: Professionalization in Nuclear Medicine Technology

Simon F. Cowell and Steven B. Dowd
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology December 1996, 24 (4) 336-341;
Simon F. Cowell
School of Medical Radiation Technology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, and University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven B. Dowd
School of Medical Radiation Technology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, and University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The medical radiation science (MRS) professions, including nuclear medicine, are often portrayed as being unprofessional. Our results show signs of positive internal perception and professionalization of the nuclear medicine science profession.

Methods: The competency-based standards (CBS) project results were analyzed using a descriptive-analytical interpretation method for evidence of professionalization.

Results: Major outcomes of the CBS document include the following signs of professionalization: name change, involvement in research, refinement of ethical content and an expected high level of professional functioning (competence beyond task performance) by entry-level practitioners (ELPs).

Conclusion: Nuclear medicine technologists, especially ELPs, saw their profession as broad and developing in a positive manner. The signs of growth in our unique body of knowledge auger well for the professionalization of nuclear medicine technology in Australia.

  • competency
  • qualitative research
  • professionalization
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 24 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 24, Issue 4
December 1, 1996
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
We Are What We Think We Are: Professionalization in Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
We Are What We Think We Are: Professionalization in Nuclear Medicine Technology
Simon F. Cowell, Steven B. Dowd
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 1996, 24 (4) 336-341;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
We Are What We Think We Are: Professionalization in Nuclear Medicine Technology
Simon F. Cowell, Steven B. Dowd
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 1996, 24 (4) 336-341;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Future of Nuclear Medicine Technology: Are We Ready for Advanced Practice?
  • Radiation Safety When a Patient Dies After Therapy
  • Dichotomous Thinking in Nuclear Medicine Technology
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • competency
  • qualitative research
  • professionalization
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire