Skip to main content

Main menu
User menu
Search
English ▼

Main menu

Home
Content
Subscriptions
Authors
Info
About
More
- Alerts
- Feedback
- Help
- SNMMI Journals

SNMMI
- JNM
- JNMT
- SNMMI Journals
- SNMMI

User menu

Subscribe
My alerts
Log in
Log out
My Cart

Search

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

SNMMI
- JNM
- JNMT
- SNMMI Journals
- SNMMI

Subscribe
My alerts
Log in
Log out
My Cart

Search for this keyword

Advanced Search

English ▼

Home
Content
Subscriptions
Authors
Info
About
More
- Alerts
- Feedback
- Help
- SNMMI Journals

View or Listen to JNM Podcast
Visit JNM on Facebook
Join JNM on LinkedIn
Follow JNM on Twitter
Subscribe to our RSS feeds

Research ArticleMethodology

Optimum Scanning Protocol for FDG-PET Evaluation of Pulmonary Malignancy

Val J. Lowe, David M. DeLong, John M. Hoffman and R. Edward Coleman

Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 1995, 36 (5) 883-887;

Val J. Lowe

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

David M. DeLong

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

John M. Hoffman

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

R. Edward Coleman

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

Article
Info & Metrics
PDF

PDF extract preview

This is a PDF-only article. The first page of the PDF of this article appears above.

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Vol. 36, Issue 5

May 1, 1995

Table of Contents
Table of Contents (PDF)
Index by author
Advertising (PDF)
Back Matter (PDF)
Ed Board (PDF)
Front Matter (PDF)

Share

Optimum Scanning Protocol for FDG-PET Evaluation of Pulmonary Malignancy

Val J. Lowe, David M. DeLong, John M. Hoffman, R. Edward Coleman

Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 1995, 36 (5) 883-887;

Share This Article:

Tweet Widget

Bookmark this article

User Name *

Password *

Remember my user name & password.

Jump to section

Article
Info & Metrics
PDF

Related Articles

No related articles found.

PubMed
Google Scholar

Cited By...

Performance of Digital PET Compared with High-Resolution Conventional PET in Patients with Cancer
Development of a SPECT Tracer to Image c-Met Expression in a Xenograft Model of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Optimizing 18F-FDG Uptake Time Before Imaging Improves the Accuracy of PET/CT in Liver Lesions
Need for Standardization of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Assessments
Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET in a Multicenter Phase I Study of Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies
Standards for PET Image Acquisition and Quantitative Data Analysis
Evaluation of Dual-Time-Point 18F-FDG PET for Staging in Patients with Lung Cancer
Consensus Recommendations for the Use of 18F-FDG PET as an Indicator of Therapeutic Response in Patients in National Cancer Institute Trials
Respiratory Gating for 3-Dimensional PET of the Thorax: Feasibility and Initial Results
Dual Time Point 18F-FDG PET for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Nodules
Current role of positron emission tomography in thoracic oncology

Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Quantitative Blood Flow Measurement of Skeletal Muscle Using Oxygen-15-Water and PET
Clinical Fusion of Three-Dimensional Images Using Bremsstrahlung SPECT and CT
A “Hybrid” Method for Measuring Myocardial Wall Thickening from Gated PET/SPECT Images

Show more Methodology

Similar Articles

Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
Fibroblast Activation Protein–Directed Imaging Outperforms ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in Malignant Mesothelioma: A Prospective, Single-Center, Observational Trial
Role of ⁶⁴CuCl₂ PET/CT in Detecting and Staging Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT
¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the Management of Osteosarcoma
Fibroblast Activation Protein–Targeted PET/CT with ¹⁸F-Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor-74 for Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Cancer: Comparison with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT

© 2025 SNMMI

This image failed to load.

Alerts for this Article

User Name *

Password *

Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address

Email *

Email this Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Your Email *

Your Name *

Send To *

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.

You are going to email the following Optimum Scanning Protocol for FDG-PET Evaluation of Pulmonary Malignancy

Message Subject (Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.

Your Personal Message

Citation Tools

Optimum Scanning Protocol for FDG-PET Evaluation of Pulmonary Malignancy

Val J. Lowe, David M. DeLong, John M. Hoffman, R. Edward Coleman

Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 1995, 36 (5) 883-887;

Citation Manager Formats

BibTeX
Bookends
EasyBib
EndNote (tagged)
EndNote 8 (xml)
Medlars
Mendeley
Papers
RefWorks Tagged
Ref Manager
RIS
Zotero

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience

By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.