JNMT
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karacalioglu, A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Ozguven, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karacalioglu, A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Ozguven, M. A.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Volume 34, Number 4, 2006 215-219
© 2006 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

A Physiologic Approach to Decreasing Upward Creep of the Heart During Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Alper O. Karacalioglu1, Bekim Jata2, Selim Kilic3, Nuri Arslan1, Seyfettin Ilgan1 and Mehmet A. Ozguven1

1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gulhane Military Medical Academy and School of Medicine, Etlik-Ankara, Turkey; 2 Department of Cardiology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy and School of Medicine, Etlik-Ankara, Turkey; and 3 Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy and School of Medicine, Etlik-Ankara, Turkey

Correspondence: For correspondence contact: Alper O. Karacalioglu, MD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gulhane Military Medical Academy and School of Medicine, 06018 Etlik-Ankara, Turkey. E-mail: aokaracali{at}yahoo.com


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 References
 
When body position changes from erect to supine, the effect of gravity on the organs also changes and is a possible underlying mechanism for upward creep of the heart during SPECT acquisitions. We hypothesized that if we provide enough time for the organs to settle after a positional change, the range of this vertical motion causing reconstruction artifacts can be decreased. Our aim was to evaluate the effect that a 5-min bed rest on the imaging table before both rest and stress SPECT acquisitions would have on upward creep of the heart. Methods: Before both stress and rest SPECT acquisitions, the first 101 consecutive patients (group A) had a 5-min bed rest and the remaining 99 patients (group B) did not have any bed rest after they were positioned on the imaging table. Upward creep was detected by comparing the distance between the lower edge of the image and the lowest part of the heart silhouette on the last projection image of detector 2 and the first projection image of detector 1. Results: Upward creep was found in 53% (54/101) and 55% (56/101) of patients in group A and in 89% (88/99) and 86% (85/99) of patients in group B in stress and rest SPECT studies, respectively. Upward creep of the heart was decreased prominently in group A, and this decrease was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion: We conclude that before SPECT acquisition, at least a 5-min bed rest on the imaging table significantly decreases vertical motion of the heart.

Key Words: 99mTc; imaging; scintigraphy


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 References
 
When the projection images of a myocardial perfusion SPECT study recorded by a dual-head {gamma}-camera in cine mode are reviewed, a vertical change in position of the heart is usually noticed between the last frame of detector 2 and the first frame of detector 1. Although these 2 datasets recorded by 2 different detectors are theoretically accepted as consecutive images, there is actually an interval between them during which repositioning of the heart occurs. This phenomenon, the so-called upward creep of the heart, was first described by Friedman at al (1). It characterizes a gradual upward shift of the heart.

Artificial perfusion defects can be triggered by patient motion on myocardial SPECT scans (24). Upward creep of the heart during SPECT acquisitions may also cause reconstruction artifacts and, therefore, false-positive reversible defects (1,57). It has been reported that movement by even 1 pixel can provoke reconstruction errors and create artifacts that resemble anterior and posterior perfusion defects (810). It has also been reported that visual artifacts were more detectable and quantitative abnormalities more frequent as the distance of movement increased (11).

Diaphragmatic movement in the supine position is greater than that in the sitting position, especially in the posterior part of the diaphragm (12). When body position changes from erect to supine, the effect of gravity on the organs also changes. Intraabdominal organs move upward, the heart comes into close physical contact with the diaphragm, the weight of the heart on the diaphragm decreases, the muscles of the abdominal wall get involved in the respiration process, the diaphragm relaxes, and the lung volume decreases (1316). These adaptive changes require a certain time frame. We hypothesized that if we provide enough time for the heart to adapt to the change in gravitational direction, the range of vertical motion of the heart during SPECT acquisitions could be decreased. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the effect that a 5-min bed rest on the imaging table before both rest and stress SPECT acquisitions would have on upward creep of the heart.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 References
 
Study Population
Two hundred consecutive patients referred for myocardial perfusion imaging to evaluate known or suspected coronary artery disease were included in this prospective study. The patients were divided into a study group and a control group. The study group (group A), consisting of the first 101 consecutive patients (65 men and 36 women; age range, 12–80 y), had a 5-min bed rest after they were positioned on the imaging table before both stress and rest SPECT acquisitions. In the control group (group B), consisting of the next 99 patients (57 men and 42 women; age range, 21–78 y), both stress and rest SPECT acquisitions were initiated immediately after the patient had been positioned on the imaging table, without any prior bed rest.

A structured interview was performed, the clinical history was taken, and cardiac risk factors were assessed before nuclear testing. Exclusion criteria were any surgery involving the heart, lungs, or great vessels; known obstructive airway disease; and diseases involving the diaphragm and phrenic nerves (6,1719). Patients who moved for any reason during the SPECT acquisition were also excluded from the study. All vasoactive medications were withheld for at least 24 h before the patients underwent SPECT. All patients were informed about the procedure and consented to it orally beforehand. The hospital ethics committee approved the study protocol.

Technique, Acquisition Protocol, and Instrumentation
All patients underwent a 2-d (stress–rest 99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile [MIBI]) protocol of stress myocardial perfusion imaging. After symptom-limited treadmill exercise using the standard Bruce protocol, 740–925 MBq (20–25 mCi) of 99mTc-MIBI (Cardio-SPECT; Medi-Radiopharma) were injected intravenously at peak stress and on the following day for rest SPECT. Acquisitions were initiated 30 ± 15 min (mean ± SD) after the injection of 99mTc-MIBI while the patients were supine. For the second phase of the investigation, a dynamic sequence (1 min/frame for 5 min) was acquired for group A to evaluate upward creep of the liver during bed rest before both stress and rest SPECT.

Quality control of the {gamma}-camera was performed routinely before the first study of each day. SPECT images were acquired with a dual-head dedicated cardiac {gamma}-camera (Optima; GE Healthcare) fitted with low-energy high-resolution collimators. Sixty-four projections were acquired at 28 s per projection over 180° (from 45° right anterior oblique to 45° left posterior oblique). A 15% window was centered over the 140-keV photopeak. Data were stored in a 64 x 64 matrix, and a 1.33 zoom was applied. No attenuation or scatter correction was used. Filtered backprojection reconstruction used a ramp filter followed by 2-dimensional Butterworth filtering (order, 5; cutoff frequency, 0.52 cycle per pixel). Any motion was documented visually using cinematic display of the projection datasets.

Image Evaluation
Upward creep can easily be detected by comparing the levels of the lower border of the heart silhouette on consecutive projection images. The distance between a straight line fitted to the lower border of the heart and the lower edge of the image on both the 32nd and the 33rd projections was measured in both stress and rest studies (Figs. 1 and 2). Using this technique, a vertical translation as small as 1 mm could be detected easily.


Figure 1
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1.  (A) Projection images derived from stress SPECT. (B and C) Thirty-second frame is last projection image of detector 2 (B), and 33rd frame is first projection image of detector 1 (C). Upward creep of heart can easily be detected by comparing distance between lower edge of image and lowest part of heart silhouette on these consecutive images.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2.  (A) Projection images derived from rest SPECT. (B and C) Thirty-second frame is last projection image of detector 2 (B), and 33rd frame is first projection image of detector 1 (C). Upward creep of heart can also be detected after rest SPECT because the phenomenon is physiologic and happens in varying degrees at every change in body position from erect to supine.

 
We also measured the distance between the upper edge of the liver and the upper edge of the image to detect upward creep of the liver on the first- and fifth-minute dynamic images in group A (Fig. 3).


Figure 3
View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3.  Images derived at first min (A) and at fifth min (B) of dynamic study of patient in group A demonstrate vertical motion of liver and heart. Considering positions of both organs according to diaphragm, detection of vertical motion of both organs at same time signifies diaphragmatic relaxation.

 
Scintigraphic images were analyzed by 2 experienced observers in a masked manner, and the results were reported as normal, ischemia, or infarct.

Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics were expressed as mean ± SD, median, and proportions. Distributions of continuous variables were evaluated by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, and Levene's test was used to determine the equality of variances. Differences between the measurements derived from consecutive cine images (the 32nd and 33rd frames) were tested for significance using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.

The significance of difference between measurements derived from the cine images of groups A and B was tested using the Mann–Whitney U test. The difference between measurements derived from the dynamic images was tested for significance using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, and the {chi}2 test was used to compare nominal variables. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 10.0 Statistical Package (SPSS Inc.) for Windows (Microsoft). Values of p less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 References
 
Daily quality control tests (8) eliminated the possibility of any malfunctions of the {gamma}-camera during the study period. No visible patient motion was detected in either group. The clinical characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Clinical Characteristics of Study Population

 
Upward creep was found in 53% (54/101; range, 1.4–14.5 mm) and 55% (56/101; range, 1.3–14.5 mm) of patients in group A and in 89% (88/99; range, 2.6–22.3 mm) and 86% (85/99; range, 1.5–18.4 mm) of patients in group B in stress and rest SPECT studies, respectively. The difference between the measurements derived from consecutive cine images (the 32nd and 33rd frames) was statistically significant (p < 0.001) in the stress and rest cine images of both groups (Table 2). Allowing a 5-min bed rest before acquisition in group A caused a prominent, statistically significant (P < 0.001) decrease in upward creep of the heart (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Results of Measurements* from Cine Images

 
Upward creep of the liver was also detected between the first- and fifth-minute images of the dynamic acquisition (Table 3), and the increase was statistically significant (p < 0.001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3 Results of Measurements* from Dynamic Images

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 References
 
The results of this study showed that a 5-min bed rest before SPECT acquisition decreases upward creep of the heart by more than 50%. Gravity has important physiologic effects on the functions and positions of organ systems, and a 5-min bed rest before SPECT acquisition seems to provide enough time for the heart to adapt itself to its new position caused by the effect of the change in gravitational direction on the organs. In our study, we also showed upward creep of the liver on dynamic acquisitions by tracking the dome of liver. Upward creep of the liver also signifies vertical motion of the diaphragm, which comes into close physical contact with the heart. Besides gravity, many other factors, such as pulmonary volume effects and diseases, can probably affect the range of vertical motion of the diaphragm or heart after a change in posture (2022).

It has been reported that upward creep is probably related to a transient increase in mean total lung volume after exercise (1), and translation of the heart has usually been reported to be common during imaging after exercise (4,5). However, we detected vertical motion of the heart after both rest and stress SPECT acquisitions. Thoracic-abdominal functional reserves of respiration dependent on the spatial positioning of the body were found to be the factor that determines the magnitude with which the thorax and diaphragm contribute to the breathing volume (14). If we consider the underlying physiologic mechanism for upward creep, this kind of motion should be expected in every change of body position from erect to supine.

Poststress motionlike artifacts have been reported to be caused by the use of a dual-head {gamma}-camera for 201Tl myocardial SPECT (23). Actually, the use of a dual-head {gamma}-camera does not cause this motionlike artifact but instead helps to detect this physiologic phenomenon.

Patient motion remains a significant source of unsatisfactory cardiac SPECT examinations. Motion-induced perfusion defects are affected by the type, amount, and timing of motion and the number of camera detectors (4,11). The different motion correction techniques are not perfect, and manual correction by an experienced technologist has proven to be the most accurate (24). Although detection is important, postacquisition attempts to correct such artifacts are incomplete and, optimally, must be prevented (2). Therefore, our approach is a physiologic method and is a preventive measure for an expected motion artifact. It also obviates motion correction programs. Moreover, it does not prolong the study time significantly in routine cardiology practice.

Although the frequency of upward creep has been estimated to be 16%–29% (1,5), it was much more common in our study both for group A and for group B. A possible explanation for this discrepancy may be our use of a dual-head {gamma}-camera for stress and rest SPECT acquisitions, allowing us to detect the beginning and end points of physiologic vertical motion of the heart by comparing the first frame of the first detector with the last frame of the second detector. The greatest amount of motion is seen between these 2 consecutive frames because of the interval between them. Therefore, dual-head {gamma}-cameras are optimal for detecting physiologic vertical motion of the heart.

Mester et al. have reported that clinically significant upward creep of the heart during stress SPECT acquisition was relatively rare (5). A possible explanation for this discrepancy between their results and ours may be that they performed a supine ergometric stress test on their patients and started the tomographic image acquisition within 5 min. Besides, they used a single-head {gamma}-camera in their study, and motion artifacts affect acquisitions with double-head detectors more than acquisitions with single-head detectors (25). The number of affected frames depends on the type (returning or nonreturning) and the time sequence of the motion. It has also been reported that with regard to upward creep, the defect was more extensive in motion simulations using a double-head detector than in those using a single-head detector (26).


    CONCLUSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 References
 
Although myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT is an accurate and reliable diagnostic study, artifacts must be avoided, or detected and corrected, to minimize the rate of false-positive results. The current study analyzed the effect of a physiologic measure to decrease the upward creep of the heart that occurs during SPECT acquisitions. We can say that at least a 5-min bed rest in the supine position on the imaging table before both rest and stress SPECT acquisitions significantly decreases vertical motion of the heart and may help avoid misinterpretations of myocardial perfusion SPECT results.


    FOOTNOTES
 
COPYRIGHT © 2006 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.


    References
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 References
 

  1. Friedman J, Van Train K, Maddahi J, et al. "Upward creep" of the heart: a frequent source of false-positive reversible defects during thallium-201 stress-redistribution SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1989;30:1718–1722.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Botvinick EH, Zhu YY, O'Connell WJ, Dae MW. A quantitative assessment of patient motion and its effect on myocardial perfusion SPECT images. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:303–310.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Sorrell V, Figueroa B, Hansen CL. The "hurricane sign": evidence of patient motion artifact on cardiac single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 1996;3:86–88.[Medline]
  4. Prigent FM, Hyun M, Berman DS, Rozanski A. Effect of motion on thallium-201 SPECT studies: a simulation and clinical study. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1845–1850.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Mester J, Weller R, Clausen M, et al. Upward creep of the heart in exercise thallium 201 single photon emission tomography: clinical relevance and a simple correction method. Eur J Nucl Med. 1991;18:184–190.[Medline]
  6. He ZX, Darcourt J, Benoliel J, Migneco O, Magne J, Bussiere-Lapalus F. Major upward creep of the heart during exercise thallium-201 myocardial SPECT in a patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:1846–1847.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Anagnostopoulos C, Pennell D, Laney R, Underwood SR. Avoidance of upward creep artifact during Tl-201 myocardial perfusion tomography using adenosine infusion: a case report. Clin Nucl Med. 1995;20:685–687.[Medline]
  8. DePuey EG. How to detect and avoid myocardial perfusion SPECT artifacts. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:699–702.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Geckle WJ, Frank TL, Links JM, Becker LC. Correction for patient and organ movement in SPECT: application to exercise thallium-201 cardiac imaging. J Nucl Med. 1988;29:441–450.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Wallis JW. Use of the selective linogram in cardiac tomography quality control. J Nucl Cardiol. 1995;2:303–308.[Medline]
  11. Cooper JA, Neumann PH, McCandless BK. Effect of patient motion on tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:1566–1571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Takazakura R, Takahashi M, Nitta N, Murata K. Diaphragmatic motion in the sitting and supine positions: healthy subject study using a vertically open magnetic resonance system. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;19:605–609.[Medline]
  13. Ganesan S, Rouch KE, Lai-Fook SJ. A finite element analysis of the effects of the abdomen on regional lung expansion. Respir Physiol. 1995;99:341–353.[Medline]
  14. Kotov AN, Miniaev VI, Miniaeva AV, Tikhonov MA, Baranov VM. Dependence of the thoracic abdominal ratio of the respiration parameters on body positioning relative to the vector of gravity [in Russian]. Aviakosm Ekolog Med. 2002;36:16–20.[Medline]
  15. Allen SM, Hunt B, Green M. Fall in vital capacity with posture. Br J Dis Chest. 1985;79:267–271.[Medline]
  16. Sakurai S, Takenaka K, Shiojima I, et al. Close physical contact of the heart with diaphragm causes pseudo-asynergy of left ventricular inferior wall in normal subjects. Echocardiography. 2004;21:573–579.[Medline]
  17. Gerscovich EO, Cronan M, McGahan JP, Jain K, Jones CD, McDonald C. Ultrasonographic evaluation of diaphragmatic motion. J Ultrasound Med. 2001;20:597–604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Iwasawa T, Kagei S, Gotoh T, et al. Magnetic resonance analysis of abnormal diaphragmatic motion in patients with emphysema. Eur Respir J. 2002;19:225–231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Diehl JL, Lofaso F, Deleuze P, Similowski T, Lemaire F, Brochard L. Clinically relevant diaphragmatic dysfunction after cardiac operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107:487–498.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Fromageot C, Lofaso F, Annane D, et al. Supine fall in lung volumes in the assessment of diaphragmatic weakness in neuromuscular disorders. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:123–128.[Medline]
  21. Gibson G. Diaphragmatic paresis: pathophysiology, clinical features and investigation. Thorax. 1989;44:960–970.[Free Full Text]
  22. Simonneau G, Vivien A, Sartene R, et al. Diaphragm dysfunction induced by upper abdominal surgery: role of postoperative pain. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983;128:899–903.[Medline]
  23. Blagosklonov O, Sabbah A, Verdenet J, Baud M, Cardot JC. Poststress motionlike artifacts caused by the use of a dual-head gamma camera for (201)Tl myocardial SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:285–291.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. O'Connor MK, Kanal KM, Gebhard MW, Rossman PJ. Comparison of four motion correction techniques in SPECT imaging of the heart: a cardiac phantom study. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:2027–2034.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Hillier DA, Wallis JW. Myocardial SPECT motion artifact as a function of motion type and number of camera detectors [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 1999;40(suppl):126P.
  26. Matsumoto N, Berman DS, Kavanagh PB, et al. Quantitative assessment of motion artifacts and validation of a new motion-correction program for myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:687–694.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication June 12, 2006. Accepted for publication September 5, 2006.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karacalioglu, A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Ozguven, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karacalioglu, A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Ozguven, M. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY