Similar articles for PMID: 31019038

Year	Number of Results
1994	1
1995	1
1997	1
1999	1
2002	1
2003	1
2004	2
2005	1
2006	2
2007	1
2008	5
2009	3
2010	2
2011	5
2012	5
2013	6
2014	6
2015	11
2016	8
2017	14
2018	15
2019	13
2020	8
2021	7
2022	5
2024	0

1

Automated Quantitative Analysis of American College of Radiology PET Phantom Images.

DiFilippo FP, Patel M, Patel S. DiFilippo FP, et al. J Nucl Med Technol. 2019 Sep;47(3):249-254. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.118.221317. Epub 2019 Apr 24. J Nucl Med Technol. 2019. PMID: 31019038 Free article.

2

Assessment of PET and SPECT phantom image quality through automated binary classification of cold rod arrays.

DiFilippo FP. DiFilippo FP. Med Phys. 2019 Aug;46(8):3451-3461. doi: 10.1002/mp.13616. Epub 2019 Jun 11. Med Phys. 2019. PMID: 31115055

3

Technical Note: Automated quantitative analysis of planar scintigraphic resolution with the ACR SPECT phantom.

DiFilippo FP. DiFilippo FP. Med Phys. 2018 Mar;45(3):1118-1122. doi: 10.1002/mp.12779. Epub 2018 Feb 16. Med Phys. 2018. PMID: 29385653

4

Evaluation of strategies towards harmonization of FDG PET/CT studies in multicentre trials: comparison of scanner validation phantoms and data analysis procedures.

Makris NE, Huisman MC, Kinahan PE, Lammertsma AA, Boellaard R. Makris NE, et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Oct;40(10):1507-15. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2465-0. Epub 2013 Jun 11. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23754762 Free PMC article.

5

Comparison and validation of automated scoring of SPECT phantom cold rod visibility.

DiFilippo FP, Palestro CJ, Nichols KJ. DiFilippo FP, et al. Med Phys. 2021 Jun;48(6):2838-2846. doi: 10.1002/mp.14776. Epub 2021 Apr 7. Med Phys. 2021. PMID: 33583063

6

Automated phantom analysis for gamma cameras and SPECT: A methodology for use in a clinical setting.

Tazegul TE, Polemi AM, Snyder A, Snyder C, Collins PG. Tazegul TE, et al. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Nov;21(11):205-214. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13057. Epub 2020 Nov 3. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020. PMID: 33142050 Free PMC article.

7

Multicenter integrated positron emission tomography/computer tomography imaging quality assurance accreditation interobserver reliability study with the American College of Radiology phantom.

Kao PF, Lee KW, Huang CW, Yang SF, Chang-Yao Tsao T. Kao PF, et al. J Chin Med Assoc. 2019 Mar;82(3):225-230. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000033. J Chin Med Assoc. 2019. PMID: 30908415

8

PET quantification with a histogram derived total activity metric: superior quantitative consistency compared to total lesion glycolysis with absolute or relative SUV thresholds in phantoms and lung cancer patients.

Burger IA, Vargas HA, Apte A, Beattie BJ, Humm JL, Gonen M, Larson SM, Ross Schmidtlein C. Burger IA, et al. Nucl Med Biol. 2014 May-Jun;41(5):410-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Feb 28. Nucl Med Biol. 2014. PMID: 24666719 Free PMC article.

9

Use of a Qualification Phantom for PET Brain Imaging in a Multicenter Consortium: A Collaboration Between the Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium and the SNMMI Clinical Trials Network.

Fahey F, Christian P, Zukotynski K, Sexton-Stallone B, Kiss C, Clarke B, Onar-Thomas A, Poussaint TY. Fahey F, et al. J Nucl Med. 2019 May;60(5):677-682. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.219998. Epub 2018 Dec 7. J Nucl Med. 2019. PMID: 30530829 Free PMC article.

10

Using compressive sensing to recover images from PET scanners with partial detector rings.

Valiollahzadeh S, Clark JW Jr, Mawlawi O. Valiollahzadeh S, et al. Med Phys. 2015 Jan;42(1):121-33. doi: 10.1118/1.4903291. Med Phys. 2015. PMID: 25563253 Free PMC article.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

109 results

Results by year