Similar articles for PMID: 29438007

Year	Number of Results
1992	1
1996	1
1998	2
1999	1
2000	1
2001	2
2002	3
2003	2
2005	1
2007	4
2008	5
2009	2
2010	2
2011	3
2012	5
2013	2
2014	5
2015	8
2016	4
2017	4
2018	9
2019	11
2020	8
2021	11
2022	11
2023	5
2024	0

1

BEST PRACTICES IN MOLECULAR BREAST IMAGING: A GUIDE FOR TECHNOLOGISTS.

Swanson T, Tran TD, Ellingson L, O'Connor MK, Rhodes DJ, Hunt KN, Conners AL, Hruska CB. Swanson T, et al. J Nucl Med Technol. 2018 Feb 2:jnmt.117.204263. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.117.204263. Online ahead of print. J Nucl Med Technol. 2018. PMID: 29438007

2

Evaluation of the quality of mammographic breast positioning: a quality improvement study.

Rouette J, Elfassy N, Bouganim N, Yin H, Lasry N, Azoulay L. Rouette J, et al. CMAJ Open. 2021 Jun 4;9(2):E607-E612. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200211. Print 2021 Apr-Jun. CMAJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34088731 Free PMC article.

3

Nuclear Medicine Technologists' Perception and Current Assessment of Quality: A Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Technologist Section Survey.

Mann A, Farrell MB, Williams J, Basso D. Mann A, et al. J Nucl Med Technol. 2017 Jun;45(2):67-74. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.117.194704. Epub 2017 May 4. J Nucl Med Technol. 2017. PMID: 28473461 Free article. Review.

4

Do mammographic technologists affect radiologists' diagnostic mammography interpretative performance?

Henderson LM, Benefield T, Bowling JM, Durham DD, Marsh MW, Schroeder BF, Yankaskas BC. Henderson LM, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Apr;204(4):903-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12903. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015. PMID: 25794085 Free PMC article.

5

Technologists' Characteristics and Quality of Positioning in Daily Practice in a Canadian Breast Cancer Screening Program.

Guertin MH, Théberge I, Zomahoun HT, Dufresne MP, Pelletier É, Brisson J. Guertin MH, et al. Acad Radiol. 2016 Nov;23(11):1359-1366. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Aug 24. Acad Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27567127

6

The Importance of Quality in Ventilation-Perfusion Imaging.

Mann A, DiDea M, Fournier F, Tempesta D, Williams J, LaFrance N. Mann A, et al. J Nucl Med Technol. 2018 Jun;46(2):89-95. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.118.210948. Epub 2018 May 3. J Nucl Med Technol. 2018. PMID: 29724800 Free article. Review.

7

Characterizing the Mammography Technologist Workforce in North Carolina.

Henderson LM, Marsh MW, Benefield T, Pearsall E, Durham D, Schroeder BF, Bowling JM, Viglione CA, Yankaskas BC. Henderson LM, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Dec;12(12 Pt B):1419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.06.001. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015. PMID: 26614888 Free PMC article.

8

Improving Performance of Mammographic Breast Positioning in an Academic Radiology Practice.

Pal S, Ikeda DM, Jesinger RA, Mickelsen LJ, Chen CA, Larson DB. Pal S, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Apr;210(4):807-815. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18212. Epub 2018 Feb 7. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018. PMID: 29412019

9

Diagnostic performance of breast technologists in reading mammograms in a clinical patient population.

van den Biggelaar FJ, Kessels AG, van Engelshoven JM, Flobbe K. van den Biggelaar FJ, et al. Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Mar;64(4):442-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02310.x. Int J Clin Pract. 2010. PMID: 20456190

10

Preparing for EQUIP by Measuring Mammography Image Quality.

Marshall W, Lillé S. Marshall W, et al. Radiol Technol. 2019 May;90(5):459-470. Radiol Technol. 2019. PMID: 31088947

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

101 results

Results by year