Ultrasonography of the renal transplant is still a key screening examination for transplant dysfunction. The addition of Doppler technology has permitted screening for hemodynamic alterations. Ambitious researchers predicted that these hemodynamic profiles would permit the differentiation of rejection from other complicating factors; however, recent research and clinical experience has shown this to be ineffective. Imaging identification of a dilated collecting system identifies the patient population that should undergo a Whitaker procedure. Identification of large or increasing fluid collections helps focus attention to possible hemorrhage or urine leak. Similarly, the ultrasonographic identification of a lymphocele as the cause of leg edema or hydronephrosis rapidly focuses surgical treatment. Doppler evaluation of hemodynamics must be performed on all renal transplant recipients. Although the role of the resistive index in predicting rejection has been minimized lately, numerous vascular complications, if untreated, would result in loss of the kidney. Doppler sonography identifies those patients who would benefit most from renal arteriography. The evaluation of renal morphology on the basis of ultrasonography alone has little role in predicting the cause of transplant dysfunction. We continue to evaluate renal size and to correlate it with the clinical presentation as well as resistive index to defer patients from biopsy if a more obvious cause of dysfunction is identified.