The fusion of anatomic and physiologic imaging in the management of patients with cancer

https://doi.org/10.1053/snuc.2001.23525Get rights and content

Imaging is of major clinical importance in the noninvasive evaluation and management of patients with cancer. Computed tomography (CT) and other anatomic imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound, have a high diagnostic ability by visualizing lesion morphology and by providing the exact localization of malignant sites. Nuclear medicine provides information on the function and metabolism of cancer. Over the last decade, there have been numerous attempts to combine data obtained from different imaging techniques. Fused images of nuclear medicine and CT (or to a lesser extent, MRI) overcome the inherent limitations of both modalities. Valuable physiologic information benefits from a precise topographic localization. Coregistered data have been shown to be useful in the evaluation of patients with cancer at diagnosis and staging, in monitoring the response to treatment, and during follow up, for early detection of recurrence. Time-consuming and difficult realignment and computation for fusion of independent studies have, until now, limited the use of registration techniques to pilot studies performed in a small number of patients. The development of the new technology of single photon emission computed tomography/CT and positron emission tomography/CT that allows for combined functional and anatomic data acquisition has the potential to make fusion an everyday clinical tool.

References (97)

  • ScottAM et al.

    Clinical applications of fusion imaging in oncology

    Nucl Med Biol

    (1994)
  • FrontD et al.

    The role of Ga-67 scintigraphy in evaluating the results of therapy of lymphoma patients

  • WahlRL

    Imaging cancer in the new millennium: Form follows function

    Radiology

    (1999)
  • MaiseyMN et al.

    Synergistic imaging

    Eur J Nucl Med

    (1992)
  • TrevesST et al.

    Three-dimensional image alignment, registration and fusion

    Q J Nucl Med

    (1998)
  • CoreiaJA

    Registration of nuclear medicine images

    J Nucl Med

    (1990)
  • ShrevePD

    Adding structure to function

    J Nucl Med

    (2000)
  • KaplanIL et al.

    Composite SPECT-CT images: Technique and potential applications in chest and abdominal imaging

    AJR Am J Roentgenol

    (1989)
  • TurkingtonTG et al.

    Accuracy of PET, SPECT and MR images of a brain phantom

    J Nucl Med

    (1993)
  • PietrzykU et al.

    An interactive technique for three-dimensional image registration: Validation for PET, SPECT, MRI and CT brain studies

    J Nucl Med

    (1994)
  • ChisinR et al.

    Registration and display of multimodal images: Applications in the extracranial head and neck region

    Otolaryngol

    (1993)
  • WahlR et al.

    “Anatometabolic” tumor imaging: Fusion of FDG-PET with CT or MRI to localize foci of increased activity

    J Nucl Med

    (1993)
  • AndersonJLR

    A rapid and accurate method to realign PET scans utilizing image edge information

    J Nucl Med

    (1995)
  • AndersonJLR et al.

    A method for coregistration of PET and MR images

    J Nucl Med

    (1995)
  • DavatzikosC

    Spatial normalization of 3-D brain images using deformable models

    J Comp Assist Tomogr

    (1996)
  • SlomkaPJ et al.

    Automated alignment and sizing of myocardial stress and rest scans to three-dimensional normal templates using an image registration algorithm

    J Nucl Med

    (1995)
  • LangTF et al.

    Description of a prototype emission-transmission computed tomography imaging system

    J Nucl Med

    (1992)
  • Beyer T, Townsend DW, Brun T, et al:A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology J Nucl Med 41:...
  • BocherM et al.

    Gamma cameramounted anatomical x-ray tomography: Technology, system characteristics and first images

    Eur J Nucl Med

    (2000)
  • Patton JA, Delbeke D, Sandler MP, Image fusion using an integrated, dual-head coincidence camera with x-ray tubebased...
  • LoatsH

    CT and SPECT image registration and fusion for spatial localization of metastatic processes using radiolabeled monoclonals

    J Nucl Med

    (1993)
  • PeraultC et al.

    Thoracic and abdominal SPECT-CT image fusion without external markers in endocrine carcinomas

    J Nucl Med

    (1997)
  • UematsuH et al.

    Coregistration of FDG PET and MRI of the head and neck using normal distribution of FDG

    J Nucl Med

    (1998)
  • HopperKD et al.

    Body CT and oncologic imaging

    Radiology

    (2000)
  • WahlRL et al.

    Staging of mediastinal non-small cell lung cancer with FDG PET, CT and fusion images: Preliminary prospective evaluation

    Radiology

    (1994)
  • PhelpsME

    PET: The merging of biology and imaging into molecular imaging

    J Nucl Med

    (2000)
  • EubankWB et al.

    Imaging of oncologic patients: Benefit of combined CT and FDG PET in the diagnosis of malignancy

    AJR Am J Roentgenol

    (1998)
  • FreenyPC et al.

    Colorectal carcinoma evaluation with CT: Preoperative staging and detection of postoperative recurrence

    Radiology

    (1986)
  • McCloudTC et al.

    Bronchogenic carcinoma: Analysis of staging in the mediastinum with CT by correlative lymph node mapping and sampling

    Radiology

    (1992)
  • QuintLE et al.

    Preoperative staging of non-small cell carcinoma of the lung: Imaging methods

    AJR Am J Roentgenol

    (1995)
  • ItoK et al.

    Recurrent rectal cancer and scar: Differentiation with PET and MR imaging

    Radiology

    (1992)
  • Medina GallardoJF et al.

    Validity of enlarged mediastinal nodes as markers of involvement by non-small cell lung cancer

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1992)
  • VansteenkisteJF et al.

    FDG-PET scan in potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer: Do anatometabolic PET-CT fusion images improve the localization of regional lymph node metastases

    Eur J Nucl Med

    (1998)
  • DwamenaBA et al.

    Metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: Mediastinal staging in the 1990s—meta-analytic comparison of PET and CT

    Radiology

    (1999)
  • BerlangieriSU et al.

    Metabolic staging of lung cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2000)
  • BerlangieriSU et al.

    F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer

    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg

    (1999)
  • CharronM et al.

    Image analysis in patients with cancer studied with a combined PET and CT scanner

    Clin Nucl Med

    (2000)
  • CookGI et al.

    Normal variants, artifacts and interpretive pitfalls in PET imaging with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose and carbon-11 methionine

    Eur J Nucl Med

    (1999)
  • Cited by (78)

    • Hybrid Imaging (PET-Computed Tomography/PET-MR Imaging) of Bone Metastases

      2019, PET Clinics
      Citation Excerpt :

      A metabolic technique like 18F-FDG PET is inferior to conventional imaging in terms of spatial resolution and localization of abnormalities,38 but coregistration of PET with CT images allows the combination of detailed anatomic localization with metabolic data and thus improves diagnostic performance over each modality used as a stand-alone.39 In the past, time-consuming coregistration of separate imaging procedures was performed manually or by using complicated fusion models, hampered by changes in patient position and organ location between the 2 procedures.40 The development of an integrated hybrid PET/CT scanner for the simultaneous acquisition of morphologic (CT) and metabolic (PET) data made image fusion applicable in the clinical routine and enabled PET/CT to position itself as a standard imaging instrument for oncologic evaluation.41

    • Medical image fusion: A survey of the state of the art

      2014, Information Fusion
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the exact radiation levels are not well understood topics, and CT has several other limitations such as limited tissue characterization because of the nature of X-ray probe, restriction of CT scan to transverse slices and practical limitation on number of X-rays that can be produced in the short scan times. Fusion combinations in which CT is one of the main modalities include MRI–CT–PET–SPECT–DSA–MEG [47,134,161], MRI–CT [15–17,147,171,176,177,258,61,149,184,150,259,170,153,172,169,154–156,186,64,192,157,193,127,158,175,195,141,162,128,91,164,165,196,239,132,173], SPECT–CT [216,221,99,241,233,246,235,213,214,253,215,243,251], MRI–CT–PET [51,188,197–199], CT–FOCAL [179], ultrasound–CT [260,231,234,238], FDG–CT [223,224], nuclear medicine–CT [201], endoscopy–MRI [183], MRI–CT–SPECT [26,202], MRI/CT–PET–SPECT [187], CT/SPET–SRS [242], FDG–PET–CT [261,226,247,249], PET–CT [244,262,211,217,236,29,220,218,68,250,252,248,219,76,255,263,257], TRUS–CT [264], ultrasound–CT [265,240,254], PET–CT–ultrasound [256]. Positron emission tomography, widely known as PET imaging or a PET scan, is a useful type of nuclear medicine imaging.

    • A review on segmentation of positron emission tomography images

      2014, Computers in Biology and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, it has been shown that fusion of abdominal images from different modalities can improve diagnosis and monitoring of disease progression [171]. Indeed, hybrid imaging techniques have proven useful for the evaluation of patients with cancer including diagnosis, staging, treatment planning, and monitoring the response to therapy including disease progression [172]. Although it was widely accepted that the process of combining relevant information from two or more images into a single image carries more information than the single image alone, segmentation of the lesions was being conducted in single images until the co-segmentation algorithms came into play.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text