SPECT/CT in Imaging Foot and Ankle Pathology—The Demise of Other Coregistration Techniques
Section snippets
Conventional Radiography (X-Ray)
This remains the most widely used, accessible, and cost-effective imaging modality for evaluation and management of acute and chronic foot pain. This has a particularly important role in the management of acute trauma, while its role in chronic injuries remains limited and at best complementary to the other techniques.
CT
CT is an established technique that has been widely available for 2 decades and the advent of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has expanded its utility. MDCT helically acquires data that may be reconstructed in any plane, and advances in technology allows submillimeter resolution which aid the clinician to better evaluate the bones, image hardware and related complications, articular cartilage lesions, and even limited assessment of tendon disease.7 The complex anatomy of the hind- and
MRI
MRI has rapidly become the preferred modality for evaluating a variety of musculoskeletal disorders, including diseases of the foot and ankle. Advances in MRI [ultrahigh field strength magnets (>1.5 T)] and in the imaging protocols offer the potential of better signal-to-noise ratio, improved resolution, and faster scan times.11 Improved resolution permits more accurate depiction of small structures, such as the articular cartilage in small joints. MRI is routinely used in the evaluation of
Ultrasonography
Ultrasound is used in patients with foot pain, to examine the soft tissue, and is often the preferred imaging modality when Morton's neuroma or Achilles tendinosis is suspected.12 Sonographic evaluation of the ankle has distinct advantages and disadvantages. Advantages include direct correlation of sonographic findings with the patient's symptoms in comparison with the asymptomatic ankle, dynamic imaging of the foot in multiple planes and positions, wide availability of sonographic equipment,
Nuclear Medicine
A bone scan is a highly sensitive technique that has been used in the diagnosis and management of skeletal pathology for nearly 3 decades.15 Groshar et al16 in their review article have described the role of bone scintigraphy in specific conditions resulting in foot pain. Although the sensitivity of the bone scan in the diagnosis of bony pathology in the foot remains high, specificity remains suboptimal. This coupled with relatively poor resolution compared with MRI and CT remains the main
Method
Standard 2 phase bone scintigraphy after intravenous injection of 800 MBq 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (as specified in the “Notes for Guidance on Clinical Administration of Radiopharmaceuticals and Use of Sealed Radioactive Sources −2006”) is carried out in accordance with the department bone scintigraphy protocol. This includes early blood pool imaging at 5 minutes postinjection of tracer followed by the standard delayed planar images at 3 hours postinjection. Anterior, posterior, lateral,
Postoperative Evaluation of Joint Fusion
Joint arthrodesis has long been used for the treatment of painful malalignment or arthritis of the hindfoot.22, 23, 24 Successful osseous union after joint arthrodesis is usually expected to occur within 6 months of the procedure25, 26, 27 and is confirmed if no joint motion is detected on clinical examination and there is evidence of trabeculation across the arthrodesis site as observed on plain film radiographs. Delayed union is defined as a successful fusion 6-9 months after surgery.
In
Our Experience
We have assessed the additional value of SPECT/CT in 16 patients referred from a specialist orthopedic clinic, and it was observed that SPECT/CT provided additional information in 13 of 16 (81%) patients and was unhelpful in 3 (19%) cases. A specific diagnosis was made in 6 of 13 (46%) patients, which included malunion, OCD, osteomyelitis, and inflammatory arthritis. More accurate localization of degenerative or postsurgical changes was observed in the remaining 7 patients. When compared with
Conclusion
Imaging of chronic foot pain remains complex and challenging. Currently MR remains the favored modality although with gradually increasing evidence, SPECT/CT shows promise as a valuable addition to the imaging armamentarium available to the clinician, particularly in the evaluation of pathology after surgery or in patients not suitable for MR, and may also play a role in guiding intra-articular injections.
References (60)
- et al.
Registration bone scan in the evaluation of wrist pain
J Hand Surg Br
(1997) - et al.
Lower extremity scintigraphy: The foot and ankle
Semin Nucl Med
(1998) - et al.
Arthroscopic treatment of ankle injuries
Orthop Clin North Am
(1994) Subcalcaneal heel pain
Orthop Clin North Am
(1994)- et al.
Overuse and sports-related injuries of the ankle and hind foot: MR imaging findings
Eur J Radiol
(2002) - et al.
Co-registration of plain X-ray and two-phase 99m Tc-MDP bone scans of wrist impact on diagnostic sensitivity and specificity
Nucl Med Commun
(2002) - et al.
Wrist registration scintigraphy: Use by specialist hand surgeons
Nucl Med Commun
(2006) - et al.
Coregistration imaging of the footA new localisation technique
J Bone Joint Surg Br
(1998) - et al.
16-Detector multislice CT-skeletal scintigraphy image co-registration (technical report)
Nucl Med Commun
(2004) - et al.
16-MDCT in the detection of occult wrist fractures: A comparison with skeletal scintigraphy
AJR Am J Roentgenol
(2005)
Ankle and foot injuries: Analysis of MDCT findings
AJR Am J Roentgenol
Analysis of 51 tibial triplane fractures using CT with multiplanar reconstruction
AJR Am J Roentgenol
Cartilage lesions in the ankle joint: Comparison of MR arthrography and CT arthrography
Skeletal Radiol
With 3D rendering of the tendons of the foot and ankle: Technique, normal anatomy, and disease
Radiographics
Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0T: Initial clinical experience
AJR Am J Roentgenol
Sonography and MR imaging of posterior tibial tendinopathy
AJR Am J Roentgenol
Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0T: Relaxation times and image contrast
AJR Am J Roentgenol
Imaging of the foot and ankle: Summary and update
Curr Opin Orthop
Radionuclide bone-imaging in the evaluation of bone pain
J Bone Joint Surg
SPECT imaging of feet using uniplanar fad-beam collimators
Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur
Added value of SPECT/CT fusion in assessing suspected bone metastasis: Comparison with scintigraphy alone and nonfused scintigraphy and CT
Radiology
SPECT/multislice low-dose CT: A clinically relevant constituent in the imaging algorithm of nononcologic patients referred for bone scintigraphy
J Nucl Med
Evaluation of combined transmission and emission tomography for classification of skeletal lesions
AJR Am J Roentgenol
SPECT-guided CT for evaluating foci of increased bone metabolism classified as indeterminate on SPECT in cancer patients
J Nucl Med
Triple arthrodesis: A critical long-term review
J Bone Joint Surg
Hind foot reconstruction and arthrodesis
Results of arthrodesis of the tarsus: Talocalcaneal, midtarsal, and subtalar joints
Foot Ankle
Subtalar joint arthrodesis
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc
Double arthrodesis in the adult
Clin Orthop
Triple arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis
Clin Orthop
Cited by (60)
Imaging modalities for non-acute pathologies of the foot and ankle
2024, Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and TraumaSPECT-CT in Foot and ankle surgery
2021, Fuss und SprunggelenkSPECT/CT in Postoperative Foot and Ankle Pain
2018, Seminars in Nuclear MedicineCitation Excerpt :The time required to achieve osseous union with absent joint movement by clinical examination and proof of trabecular bone bridging seen in radiographs varies between the different foot and ankle joints. Fusion is usually achieved within 6 months after surgery, but it may last up to 9 months in case of delayed union.30,31 In forefoot joints, fusion is noted at an average of 12 weeks, whereas in the hind foot, complete osseous union is achieved on average between 15 weeks in the subtalar joint, 26 weeks in the ankle joint, and up to 30 weeks after triple arthrodesis.32
Diagnostics in tarsal fusion: The theory and practise in The Netherlands
2017, Foot and Ankle SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Possibly, improved intraoperative correction could be achieved by using this new technology. Recent and older studies quite convincingly demonstrate the value of hybrid PET/CT or SPECT/CT imaging to improve on the separate quality of both anatomical and functional techniques [30,31,36]. The cost effectiveness of the different diagnostic modalities was not studied but is of great importance.
Hybrid imaging in foot and ankle disorders
2018, Revista Espanola de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular