Original article
PET/CT imaging: Effect of respiratory motion on apparent myocardial uptake

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.09.003Get rights and content

Background

Positron emission tomography (PET) attenuation correction (AC) using computed tomography (CT) can be affected by respiratory motion: hi-speed CT captures 1 point of the respiratory cycle while PET emission data averages many cycles. We quantified the changes in apparent myocardial uptake due to this respiratory-induced CT attenuation mismatch.

Methods

Twenty-two patients undergoing fluorine-18 fluorodexyglucose (FDG) PET/CT received 3 sequential CT scans at normal resting end-inspiration (CTINSPIR), ending expiration (CTEXPIR), and at midvolume between end-expiration and end-inspiration (CTMIDVOL). A pneumotachometer measured absolute changes in lung volume. Seven subjects also underwent a 3-minute transmission scan with a 68Ge rotating rod source (RRS). The PET emission data set was reconstructed up to 4 times using CTEXPIR, CTINSPIR, CTMIDVOL, and RRS AC maps. Relative heart position and cardiac uptake was measured for each CT attenuation correction.

Results

Respiratory motion produced marked changes in global and regional myocardial uptake. Changes were large in the lateral and anterior regions at the lung-soft tissue interface (up to 30% using CTINSPIR compared to CTEXPIR for AC) and smaller in the septal region (10% or less). Data corrected with CTEXPIR agreed best with the RRS.

Conclusion

Respiratory effects can introduce large inhomogeneities in apparent myocardial uptake when CT is used for attenuation correction.

Section snippets

Study Population

The study group consisted of 22 subjects (10 women and 12 men; mean age, 43.6 ± 15.1 years; mean height, 172.8 ± 8.3 cm; mean weight, 79.1 ± 21.1 kg). The study was performed under a National Institutes of Health–approved protocol. Twenty-five subjects originally entered the protocol, but one was excluded because of scanner malfunction, one because of inadvertent patient motion, and one because of error in following breathing instructions. All patients gave written informed consent. All were

Heart Motion

Consistent with previous reports,14 the heart (and other organs, such as the liver) was displaced between the 3 CT scans. Figure 2 shows a typical coronal view of the same CT slice of a patient. These 2 CT scans were taken during normal breathing at end-expiration and at end-inspiration (mean change in lung volume compared with end-expiration, averaged over all subjects, was 0.52 ± 0.25 L at midvolume and 1.01 ± 0.54 L at end-inspiration). By use of CTEXPIR as a reference, the mean motion of

Discussion

Whether the patient holds or does not hold his or her breath during the CT scan, a fast CT scan freezes the lungs at one point in the respiratory cycle. Because this CT scan does not duplicate the respiratory blurring inherent in the emission data, using the CT scan to perform AC may substantially alter the apparent cardiac FDG uptake. The decrease in the global apparent uptake (ie, averaged over the whole myocardium) when CTMIDVOL or CTINSPIR was used for AC rather than CTEXPIR is probably due

Acknowledgment

The authors have indicated they have no financial conflicts of interest.

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (80)

  • Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

    2017, Encyclopedia of Cardiovascular Research and Medicine
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text