Health services research and policyOriginal articleSurvey-Based Assessment of Patients’ Understanding of Their Own Imaging Examinations
Introduction
Shared decision making by patients and physicians contributes to patients experiencing reduced anxiety as well as greater satisfaction, engagement, sense of control, and participation in their own care 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Past studies report that provision of information to patients is among the most critical steps for achieving shared decision making [6], and that the process entails having patients that are as knowledgeable as possible regarding their management [1]. In addition, in studies of a range of medical conditions, patients have been observed to want greater knowledge regarding their care 4, 7, 8.
Radiologists can contribute to shared decision making by ensuring that patients have a strong understanding of the imaging examinations they undergo. Such understanding includes awareness of the modality of the examination, the body part being imaged, any use of intravenous or other contrast agents, and potential radiation exposure. Obtaining this level of understanding involves providing patients with sufficient opportunity for any questions to be answered by a health care provider who is knowledgeable regarding the examination. However, reaching this goal may be challenging given that the physicians who order radiologic tests are typically not the same physicians who perform and interpret the tests; this situation creates a potential gap in patient communication that may result in a deficit in their understanding of these areas. For instance, past studies show that patients have incomplete knowledge regarding radiation exposure and risk from CT 9, 10.
To provide greater insight into patients’ knowledge of radiologic testing, we administered a prospective survey to outpatients undergoing imaging examinations at our institution. We report findings from this assessment of patients’ knowledge regarding radiologic imaging examinations, including their perspectives on the communication of such information. The results of this survey, including factors identified to be associated with patients’ understanding of imaging examinations, could be used to guide future initiatives to improve patient awareness.
Section snippets
Methods
Our institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant prospective study. All subjects provided written informed consent. Adult outpatients undergoing radiologic imaging examinations at our institution were given a voluntary survey while in the waiting area before the start of the scheduled examination. Questions were related to knowledge of specific aspects of their examination, as well as their experience in being educated about the examination before their appointment. Most questions
Patients’ Knowledge of Radiologic Imaging Examinations
A total of 97.1% (166 of 171) of patients correctly identified the modality of the scheduled imaging examination. In 4 of the 5 instances in which the patient identified the incorrect modality, a response of CT was provided, rather than MRI, ultrasound, or nuclear medicine. In addition, 97.8% (170 of 174) of patients correctly identified the body part being imaged. (Fig. 1)
Overall, 45.8% (76 of 166) of patients correctly identified whether the examination entailed radiation. A total of 51.1%
Discussion
We performed a prospective survey-based assessment of patients’ knowledge of their scheduled imaging examinations. A reassuring finding is that the overwhelming majority of patients correctly identified the imaging modality being used and the body part being imaged. However, patients less reliably understood other aspects of their examinations. Approximately half of patients incorrectly identified whether their examination entailed radiation exposure, and a substantial fraction of patients were
Conclusions
We have identified key areas of incomplete knowledge by patients regarding their scheduled radiologic examinations, including knowledge of radiation exposure and use of contrast agents. Examinations were not explained consistently to patients in advance, or were not explained satisfactorily, by referring physicians, and patients not uncommonly reported having incomplete understanding as well as remaining unanswered questions about their scheduled examinations. A small majority of patients were
Take-Home Points
- ■
In a survey of outpatients awaiting radiologic imaging, 45.8% correctly identified whether the examination entailed radiation; 51.1% and 71.4% of patients who were scheduled to receive intravenous or oral contrast, respectively, were aware that it would be administered.
- ■
A total of 78.6% of patients indicated that the ordering physician explained the examination in advance. Among these, 72.1% indicated satisfaction with the explanation.
- ■
A total of 21.8% and 20.5% of patients indicated consulting
References (15)
- et al.
Impact of a shared decision-making program on patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia
Urology
(1999) - et al.
Beyond consent—improving understanding in surgical patients
Am J Surg
(2012) - et al.
Information communicated with patients in decision making about their abdominal aortic aneurysm
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
(2010) - et al.
Emergency department patient knowledge, opinions, and risk tolerance regarding computed tomography scan radiation
J Emerg Med
(2014) Patient engagement in a rapidly changing communication environment: reflections of a cancer survivor
J Natl Cancer InstMonogr
(2013)- et al.
Engaging patients in health care decisions in the emergency department through shared decision-making: a systematic review
Acad Emerg Med
(2012) - et al.
Shared decision making and self-management in multiple sclerosis—a consequence of evidence
J Neurol
(2007)
Cited by (0)
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.