Original article
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® on Chest Pain, Suggestive of Acute Coronary Syndrome

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2010.08.023Get rights and content

Acute chest pain suggestive of acute coronary syndrome is a frequent complaint in the emergency department. Acute coronary syndromes include myocardial infarction and unstable angina. Being able to establish the diagnosis rapidly and accurately may be lifesaving. A cardiac workup is indicated in this subset of patients in the acute setting, even if there are no ischemic changes on electrocardiography. If the clinical examination and initial cardiac workup suggest that a patient is having myocardial ischemia, the patient will usually be urgently referred for invasive coronary angiography and revascularization. In stable patients without evidence of ST elevation and ongoing myocardial ischemia, an initially conservative approach is sometimes considered. Cardiac risk stratification of this subgroup of patients who are at low and intermediate risk for coronary artery disease is recommended before discharge, and imaging is necessary to exclude ischemia as an etiology. Noninvasive cardiac imaging modalities include chest radiography, single photon-emission CT myocardial perfusion imaging, echocardiography, multidetector CT, PET, and MRI. Noncardiac etiologies of chest pain include aortic dissection, aortic aneurysm, pulmonary embolism, pericardial disease, and lung parenchymal disease. Noninvasive cardiac imaging in patients who are at low and intermediate risk for coronary artery disease may improve confidence regarding the safety of discharge from the emergency department. In addition to risk stratification, noncoronary etiologies for chest pain can be established with imaging.

Section snippets

Summary of Literature Review

Acute chest pain is a frequent presentation in emergency departments. Along with other important disease entities (eg, aortic dissection, pulmonary embolus), clinical symptoms may raise the possibility of acute myocardial ischemia. Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) include ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI (NSTEMI), and unstable angina (UA) [1]. Being able to establish the diagnosis rapidly and accurately may be lifesaving. The immediate cardiac workup consists of

Summary

  • A number of imaging modalities may be utilized in evaluating stable patients with chest pain suggestive of ACS who are not selected for urgent cardiac catheterization (see Table 1).

  • Although cardiac catheterization is the mainstay for evaluation of patients in whom ACS is being considered, in clinically stable patients with UA or NSTEMI, alternative noninvasive imaging modalities may be appropriate.

  • Noninvasive imaging in this setting includes myocardial perfusion scanning, CCTA, and

Anticipated Exceptions

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis is a disorder with a scleroderma-like presentation and a spectrum of manifestations that can range from limited clinical sequelae to fatality. It seems to be related to both underlying severe renal dysfunction and the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents. It has occurred primarily in patients on dialysis, rarely in patients with very limited glomerular filtration rates (ie, <30 mL/min/1.73 m2), and almost never in other patients. There is growing

Relative Radiation Level Information

Potential adverse health effects associated with radiation exposure are an important factor to consider when selecting the appropriate imaging procedure. Because there is a wide range of radiation exposures associated with different diagnostic procedures, a relative radiation level indication has been included for each imaging examination. The relative radiation levels are based on effective dose, which is a radiation dose quantity that is used to estimate population total radiation risk

References (59)

  • D. Kuo et al.

    Emergency cardiac imaging: state of the art

    Cardiol Clin

    (2006)
  • D.B. Pryor et al.

    Estimating the likelihood of severe coronary artery disease

    Am J Med

    (1991)
  • R. Rubinshtein et al.

    Impact of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography on clinical decision-making in emergency department patients with chest pain of possible myocardial ischemic origin

    Am J Cardiol

    (2007)
  • C. Shub

    Stable angina pectoris: 2. Cardiac evaluation and diagnostic testing

    Mayo Clin Proc

    (1990)
  • R.E. Buenger

    Five thousand acute care/emergency department chest radiographs: comparison of requisitions with radiographic findings

    J Emerg Med

    (1988)
  • T. Varetto et al.

    Emergency room technetium-99m sestamibi imaging to rule out acute myocardial ischemic events in patients with nondiagnostic electrocardiograms

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1993)
  • A.M. Amanullah et al.

    Assessment of left ventricular wall motion in angina pectoris by two-dimensional echocardiography and myocardial perfusion by technetium-99m sestamibi tomography during adenosine-induced coronary vasodilation and comparison with coronary angiography

    Am J Cardiol

    (1993)
  • P.J. Colon et al.

    Utility of stress echocardiography in the triage of patients with atypical chest pain from the emergency department

    Am J Cardiol

    (1998)
  • S.H. Lim et al.

    2-D echocardiography prediction of adverse events in ED patients with chest pain

    Am J Emerg Med

    (2003)
  • K.L. Tong et al.

    Myocardial contrast echocardiography versus Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction score in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and a nondiagnostic electrocardiogram

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2005)
  • R.C. Hendel et al.

    ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2006)
  • M.J. Gallagher et al.

    The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with stress nuclear imaging in emergency department low-risk chest pain patients

    Ann Emerg Med

    (2007)
  • J.A. Goldstein et al.

    A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2007)
  • A. Kuettner et al.

    Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology: initial clinical results

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2004)
  • T. Mochizuki et al.

    Assessment of coronary artery and cardiac function using multidetector CT

    Semin Ultrasound CT MR

    (2004)
  • R. Rubinshtein et al.

    Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic triage of patients with chest pain and negative or nondiagnostic exercise treadmill test result

    Am J Cardiol

    (2007)
  • T.C. Gerber et al.

    Radiation dose and safety in cardiac computed tomography

    Cardiol Clin

    (2009)
  • B.G. Heilbron et al.

    Submillisievert coronary computed tomography angiography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction—a new reality

    Can J Cardiol

    (2010)
  • E.M. Antman et al.

    2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the Canadian Cardiovascular Society endorsed by the American Academy of Family Physicians: 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, writing on behalf of the 2004 Writing Committee

    Circulation

    (2008)
  • Cited by (0)

    The ACR seeks and encourages collaboration with other organizations on the development of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria® through society representation on expert panels. Participation by representatives from collaborating societies on the expert panel does not necessarily imply society endorsement of the final document.

    The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences or the Department of Defense.

    View full text