Elsevier

Bone

Volume 30, Issue 1, January 2002, Pages 247-250
Bone

Measurement of bone mineral density at the spine and proximal femur by volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in elderly women with and without vertebral fractures

https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00647-0Get rights and content

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine the effect of vertebral fracture status on trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) measurements obtained in the proximal femur and spine by helical volumetric quantitative computed tomography (vQCT). The study population consisted of 71 Italian women (average age 73 ± 6) years. This group included 26 subjects with radiographically confirmed atraumatic vertebral fractures and 45 controls. The subjects received helical CT scans of the L1 and L2 vertebral bodies and the hip. The three-dimensional CT images were processed using specialized image analysis algorithms to extract measurements of trabecular, cortical, and integral BMD in the spine and hip. To compare the vQCT results with the most widely used clinical BMD measurement, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of the anteroposterior (AP) spine and proximal femur were also obtained. The difference between the subjects with vertebral fractures and the age-matched controls was computed for each BMD measure. All BMD measurements showed statistically significant differences, which ranged from 7% to 22% between subjects with fractures and controls. Although, given our small sample size, we could not detect statistically significant differences in discriminatory power between BMD techniques, integral BMD of the spine measured by vQCT and DXA tended to show stronger associations with fracture status (0.001 < p < 0.004). Measurements by QCT and DXA at the hip were also associated with vertebral fracture status, although the association of DXA BMD with fracture status was explained largely by differences in body weight between subjects with vertebral fractures and controls.

Introduction

For assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) in the elderly population, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements in the proximal femur are often preferred to anteroposterior (AP) measurements of the lumbar spine. This preference is based on studies showing that hip BMD is a better predictor of hip fracture than AP spinal BMD,2 and that inclusion of hypertrophic and degenerative changes into the measured region artificially elevates the BMD values in the elderly spine, reducing the sensitivity for detection of vertebral osteoporosis.13, 16, 17

Although the comparative efficacy of spinal and femoral DXA measurements for estimation of hip and spine fracture risk has been thoroughly addressed in the literature,2, 3, 18 comparisons between hip and spine measurements are lacking for volumetric quantitative computed tomography (vQCT), because protocols to assess the proximal femur, have only recently been developed.7, 11 Such information is of increasing interest because the widespread clinical dissemination of helical CT systems has resulted in higher availability of scanner time and has broadened the potential market for vQCT BMD measurements.

In this study, we compared vQCT BMD measurements of the spine and proximal femur in a cohort of elderly Italian women who were referred for routine clinical bone mineral assessment by DXA. We determined trabecular, integral, and cortical BMD values at the two skeletal sites and examined differences in the vQCT and DXA measures between subjects with one or more atraumatic vertebral fractures and subjects without vertebral fractures.

Section snippets

Subjects

Our cohort consisted of 84 Italian women who were referred to the bone mineral unit of the Department of Radiology, Hospital “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” (San Giovanni Rotundo, Italy), for routine clinical DXA measurements. The study subjects were recruited consecutively over a 6 month period, and vertebral fracture status was established by analysis of thoracolumbar radiographs (see later). The characteristics of the cohort are summarized in Table 1. The study was approved by the ethics

Results

The results of the BMD measurements are summarized in Table 2. All variables differed between the group of subjects with vertebral fractures and the control group. With the exception of the FEM-CORT region, all these differences remained statistically significant even after adjustment of the data for the small age difference between groups. The 2D-TRAB, 2D-INTGL, and Ward’s Triangle (WARDS) regions showed a trend toward the largest percentage decrements between the subjects with vertebral

Discussion

DXA and vQCT differ in that the former provides an areal BMD measurement that scales with bone volume and is thus a composite measure of bone size and volumetric density.1, 9 Thus, the capability of DXA BMD to estimate fracture risk at a given skeletal site depends in part on the relative importance of bone size and volumetric density for bone strength. However, unlike DXA, vQCT is a three-dimensional technique that measures BMD volumetrically and that permits separate characterization of bone

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Image Analysis, Inc. The authors are grateful for the excellent technical assistance of Maria Carmela Bocci, R. T., Nunzia Crisetti, R. T., Giovanni Miscio, R.T., Lucia Scaramuzzi, R.T. We also thank David Breazeale for editorial assistance.

References (19)

  • S.R Cummings et al.

    Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fracturesThe study of osteoporotic fractures

    Lancet

    (1993)
  • T.F Lang et al.

    Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femurprecision and relation to bone strength

    Bone

    (1997)
  • S Cummings et al.

    Does estimating volumetric bone density of the femoral neck improve the prediction of hip fracture?

    Bone Miner Res

    (1994)
  • F Dubouef et al.

    Different morphometric and densitometric parameters predict cervical and trochanteric hip fractureThe EPIDOS study

    J Bone Miner Res

    (1997)
  • H.K Genant et al.

    Quantitative computed tomography of vertebral spongiosaA sensitive method for detecting early bone loss after oophorectomy

    Ann Intern Med

    (1982)
  • H.K Genant et al.

    Vertebral fracture assessment using a semi-quantitative technique

    J Bone Miner Res

    (1993)
  • S Grampp et al.

    Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination and diagnostic classification

    J Bone Miner Res

    (1997)
  • Heitz Bestimmung von Dichte und Stabilitaet des Menschlichen Oberschenkelknochens auf der Basis von CT-Daten. Physics

  • M Ito et al.

    Relationship of osteophytes to bone mineral density and spinal fracture in men

    Radiology

    (1993)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text