Quantitative scintigraphic parameters for the assessment of renal transplant patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0720-048X(97)00179-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Radionuclide renal diagnostic studies play an important role in assessing renal allograft function especially in the early post transplant period. In the last two decades various quantitative parameters have been derived from the radionuclide renogram to facilitate and confirm the changes in perfusion and/or function of the kidney allograft. In this review article we discuss the quantitative parameters that have been used to assess graft condition with emphasis on the early post-operative period. These quantitative methods were divided into parameters used for assessing renal graft perfusion and parameters used for evaluating parenchymal function. The blood flow in renal transplants can be quantified by measuring (a) the rate of activity appearance in the kidney graft; (b) the ratio of the integral activity under the transplanted kidney and arterial curves e.g. Hilson’s perfusion index and Kircher's kidney/aortic ratio; (c) calculating the renal vascular transit time by deconvolution analysis. The literature overview on these parameters showed us that they have some practical disadvantages of requiring high quality bolus injection and numerical variations related to changes in the site and size of regions of interest. In addition, the perfusion parameter values suffer from significant overlap when various graft pathologies coexist. Quantitative evaluation of the graft parenchymal extraction and excretion was assessed by parameters derived from 123I/131I-OIH, 99mTc-DTPA or 99mTc-MAG3 renograms. We review in this article a number of parenchymal parameters which include (1) plasma clearance methods like glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF); (2) renal transit times such as parenchymal mean transit time, Tmax, T1/2; (3) parenchymal uptake and excretion indices as the accumulation index, graft uptake capacity at 2 and 10 min, excretion index and elimination index. These indices, however, are non-specific and far from defining a specific cause for graft parenchymal dysfunction. In conclusion, despite that the literature is replete with mathematical strategies for quantitating perfusion and parenchymal functions, none of these have enough diagnostic power for specific diagnosis of graft dysfunction. In addition, no universal agreement on the use of certain quantitation parameters in transplant patients has been reached.

Introduction

In the last two decades various quantitative parameters from dynamic renal scintigraphy have been derived to facilitate the detection and follow-up of renal graft pathology [1]. The radionuclide renogram offers possibilities for the quantitative evaluation of the graft function. This is usually based on the analysis of the three phases of the renogram originally described by Taplin et al. [2]. The first phase of this division corresponds to the transit of the tracer bolus through the renal blood vessels. In the second phase the nephrons extract the radiotracer from the blood to be excreted into urine by either glomerular filtration and/or tubular excretion. The third phase corresponds to the drainage of the pelvicalcyeal system (Fig. 1). In order to evaluate the handling of the tracer by the kidney in a quantitative way various indices have been proposed [3]. The quantitative parameters that have been used to assess graft function in the post-operative period will be discussed comprehensively in this review, and have been listed in Table 1.

Section snippets

Assessment of renal graft perfusion

Damage to the microcirculation of the renal graft is an early event in the course of allograft dysfunction, usually preceding measurable functional derangements in the transplanted kidney [4]. Because recovery of the graft function is largely dependent on perfusion, the assessment of perfusion in the early post-transplant period is of utmost importance. Renal perfusion imaging (RPI) is defined as the rapid dynamic renal examination carried out in the 1st min after administration of

Assessment of parenchymal extraction and excretion

Radiopharmaceuticals with a well-defined mode of pharmacological handling such as [99mTc]DTPA, [131I]hippuran and [99mTc]MAG3 are excellent agents for the evaluation of graft function. Quantitative evaluation of the graft parenchymal function were first described as parameters applied to the [131I]OIH renograms. They include time to peak of the renogram (Tmax), half time of the elimination phase (T1/2), ratio of bladder and kidney curve heights, bladder appearance time, and kidney to background

Conclusion

Radionuclide scintigraphy of the renal transplants has assumed an important role, especially if carried out serially, in monitoring graft function in the post-transplant period. Both qualitative and quantitative information on the graft condition can be obtained from radionuclide renography. The literature is however replete with mathematical strategies for quantitating perfusion and parenchymal functions but none of these have enough diagnostic power for specific diagnosis of graft dysfunction.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Tilly Hagendoorn for her expert secretarial assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

References (74)

  • PT Kirchner et al.

    Correlation of gamma camera and flow meter determined renal blood flow measurements (Abstract)

    J Nucl Med

    (1974)
  • EV Dubovsky et al.

    Comprehensive evaluation of renal function in the transplanted kidney

    J Nucl Med

    (1975)
  • AJ Hilson et al.

    Dynamic renal transplant imaging with Tc-99m DTPA (Sn) supplemented by a transplant perfusion index in the management of renal transplants

    J Nucl Med

    (1978)
  • DF Preston et al.

    Radionuclide evaluation of renal transplants

    J Nucl Med

    (1979)
  • PT Kirchner et al.

    Clinical application of the kidney to aortic blood flow index (K/A ratio)

    Contrib Nephrol

    (1978)
  • DL Williams

    Improvement in quantitative data analyses by numerical deconvolution techniques

    J Nucl Med

    (1979)
  • WN Tauxe et al.
  • AM Peters et al.

    Noninvasive measurement of blood flow and extraction fraction

    Nucl Med Commun

    (1987)
  • B Bubeck et al.

    Renal function studies using 99mTc-MAG3: pharmacokinetics and slope clearance determination

    Contrib Nephrol

    (1990)
  • GR Conrad et al.

    Renal arteriovenous transit times of technetium-radiolabeled chelates

    J Nucl Med

    (1987)
  • RT Groothedde et al.

    The differential ratio. A method for describing blood flow in renal transplants

    Nucl Med Commun

    (1990)
  • A Riedinger Berriolo et al.

    Normal range of [99mTc]MAG-3 renogram parameters in renal transplant recipients

    Transplant Proc

    (1994)
  • CD Russell et al.

    Quantitation of renal function with technetium-99m MAG3

    J Nucl Med

    (1988)
  • SV Ellam et al.

    Measurement of changes of blood flow in renal transplants

    Eur J Nucl Med

    (1983)
  • W Gedroyc et al.

    Tc-99m DTPA scans in renal allograft rejection and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity

    Transplantation

    (1986)
  • D Anaise et al.

    Cortex perfusion index: a sensitive detector of acute rejection crisis in transplanted kidneys

    J Nucl Med

    (1986)
  • EA George et al.

    Assessment of renal allograft pathology by scintigraphic and ultrasound index-markers

    Clin Nucl Med

    (1991)
  • AM Al-Nahhas et al.

    Cellular versus vascular rejection in transplant kidneys. Correlation of radionuclide and Doppler studies with histology

    Nucl Med Commun

    (1993)
  • M Fraile et al.

    Transplant renography: 99m-Tc-DTPA versus 99m-Tc-MAG3. A preliminary note

    Eur J Nucl Med

    (1989)
  • N Oriuchi et al.

    Tc-99m MAG3: A sensitive indicator for evaluating perfusion and rejection of renal transplants

    Nucl Med Commun

    (1997)
  • NJ Brown et al.

    The renogram and its quantitation

    Br J Urol

    (1969)
  • CD Russell

    Measurement and interpretation of renal transit times

  • MD Rutland

    Mean transit times without deconvolution

    Nucl Med Commun

    (1981)
  • P Schmidlin et al.

    Renal perfusion and mean vascular transit time

    Eur J Nucl Med

    (1985)
  • T Chaiwatanarat et al.

    Deconvolution analysis of renal blood flow: evaluation of postrenal transplant complications

    J Nucl Med

    (1994)
  • AM Peters et al.

    Non-invasive measurement of renal blood flow with 99mTc DTPA: comparison with radiolabelled microspheres

    Cardiovasc Res

    (1987)
  • AM Peters

    Quantification of renal haemodynamics with radionuclides

    Eur J Nucl Med

    (1991)
  • Cited by (40)

    • Value of Baseline Post-Transplant MAG3 Renal Scintigraphy in the Evaluation of Graft Function

      2022, Transplantation Proceedings
      Citation Excerpt :

      They were chosen based on their simplicity (not requiring additional software or serum/urine collection), applicability, and ease of reproducibility. Perfusion parameters that quantitate blood flow to the graft were not included in this study, as they could be liable to technical errors (eg, fractionated bolus, extravasation) and would require higher doses of radiotracer to achieve adequate counting statistics [15,16]. Current literature on renal scintigraphy in the post-transplant setting varies significantly, particularly with regards to the choice of scan parameters, parameter cutoffs, and study endpoints.

    • Imaging in Renal Transplants: An Update

      2021, Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      The perfusion curve of renal transplant has first pass peak followed by a second peak showing early tubular extraction (Fig. 3). It was shown that this second peak was flattened in graft rejection.37,38 Recent publication favors Tc-99m DTPA over Tc-99m MAG3 in renal transplant patients due to various perfusion parameters that detect change of function.25

    • SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Diuretic Renal Scintigraphy in Adults With Suspected Upper Urinary Tract Obstruction 1.0

      2018, Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Renal scans are sometimes performed after intravenous injection of approximately 370 MBq (10 mCi) of 99mTc-MAG3 or 99mTc-DTPA. Administration of activities in the range of 370 MBq may be required to obtain sufficient counts to visualize the initial bolus as it transits the aorta and kidneys (radionuclide angiogram) or to calculate quantitative flow indices.45-47 However, except for the evaluation of renal transplants, neither 2-second flow images nor quantitative flow calculations obtained in the first few seconds after injection have been shown to contribute to the evaluation of relative function, suspected obstruction, or renovascular hypertension.45-48

    • Renal scintigraphy for post-transplant monitoring after kidney transplantation

      2018, Transplantation Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      A quantitative analysis is preferable since it is less affected by inter-observer variability compared to a visual analysis with/without the use of a curve grading scale [14]. Over the years, several methods have been introduced with varying degrees of success, due to lack of diagnostic power and the inability to distinguish AR from ATN [12, 15]. In general, most quantitative indices describe the extraction/uptake and excretion/clearance.

    • Kidney

      2013, Haschek and Rousseaux's Handbook of Toxicologic Pathology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text