Cholescintigraphy in the critically III

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80030-8Get rights and content

Summary

Critical review of cholescintigraphy in critically ill patients suggests the examination will not conclusively prove or disprove the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. Of 17 scans performed in critically ill patients with clinical evidence of acute cholecystitis, 7 were true-negative, 1 was false-negative, 6 were false-positive, and 3 were nondiagnostic. Cholestasis and hepatocyte dysfunction, common in the critically ill, result in abnormal clearance of hepatobiliary radionuclide imaging agents, decreasing the usefulness of cholescintigraphy in this patient population. diagnosing acute cholecystitis in a critically ill patient remains difficult.

References (15)

  • FreitasJE

    Cholescintigraphy in acute and chronic cholecystitis

    Semin Nucl Med

    (1982)
  • CerraFB

    The systemic septic response: multiple system failure

  • MaingotR.

    Types of cholecystitis: the management of acute and chronic calculus cholecystitis

  • HanksJB et al.

    Gastrointestinal complications after cardiopulmonary bypass

    Surgery

    (1982)
  • SheldonGF et al.

    Hepatic dysfunction during hyperalimentation

    Arch Surg

    (1978)
  • LindorKD et al.

    Liver function values in adults receiving total parenteral nutrition

    JAMA

    (1979)
  • CaruanaJA et al.

    Functional and histopathologic changes in the liver during sepsis

    Surg Gynecol Obstet

    (1982)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (15)

  • Acute acalculous cholecystitis and cardiovascular disease, which came first? After two hundred years still the classic chicken and eggs debate: A review of literature

    2022, Annals of Medicine and Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Due to the possibility to allow a rapid diagnosis, the safety and absence of radiation ultrasonography- US represents the most useful diagnostic tool in the Emergency Department. Nevertheless, the sensitivity and the specificity of US varies from 30% to 100% [19,34,41,42,67–73]. This large divergence comes, probably from the different criteria for sonographic diagnosis used in the mostly retrospective studies.

  • Acute Acalculous Cholecystitis: A Review

    2010, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
    Citation Excerpt :

    It is evident that despite many attempts to elucidate the pathogenesis of AAC, it still is not completely defined. The diagnosis of AAC is difficult because no clinical findings (review of symptoms, physical examination, laboratory tests) establish it.2,3,7,8,11,16,20 There are many confounding factors.

  • Acute Cholecystitis, Biliary Obstruction, and Biliary Leakage

    2003, Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, all patients in that study also had hepatocellular disease. Severe intercurrent illness (eg, massive trauma, sepsis, life-threatening postoperative complications, acute respiratory diseases has been associated with false-positive cholescintigraphy.27,33,36 One report found a 30% false-positive rate.33

  • Results of cholescintigraphy in a VA hospital

    1992, Journal of Surgical Research
  • 1990, The American Journal of Surgery
View all citing articles on Scopus
1

From the Departments of Surgery and Radiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 410 West Tenth Avenue, Columbus, Ohio.

View full text