Instrument- and computer-related problems and artifacts in nuclear medicine

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-2998(96)80003-1Get rights and content

Advances in γ-camera design over the last 5 to 10 years have improved all aspects of image quality, particularly for tomographic imaging. As system complexity increases, it becomes more important that both the technologist and physician be able to recognize the various types of artifacts that can occur in γ-camera systems and their potential impact on clinical studies. A thorough evaluation of the system at installation and a comprehensive quality control program will detect most problems that can occur. The most sensitive indicator of γ-camera performance is uniformity. Because this measurement is performed on a daily basis, it is the principle tool in evaluating the status of the γ-camera. Most artifacts related to the integrity of the detector head, computer system, and hard copy device can be detected on the uniformity image. For tomographic imaging, a quantitative determination of uniformity is needed to ensure that the system will not introduce ring artifacts into the patient data. Unlike planar imaging, the complex nature of tomographic imaging requires additional checks on system performance to ensure that other components of the system, such as the collimator, gantry, and imaging table, are not a source of artifact in the reconstructed image data. Failure of a system component can occur at any time and may be subtle and difficult to recognize in modern systems. In such an environment it becomes imperative that any unexpected finding in a clinical study be questioned with respect to a possible malfunction of some aspect of data acquisition and analysis.

References (21)

  • ChandraR

    Operational characteristics and quality control of imaging devices

  • GrahamLS

    Quality assurance of anger cameras

  • CranageRW et al.

    The effect of high energy impurities on measurements of gamma-camera resolution and uniformity using Co-57 flood sources

    Br J Radiol

    (1979)
  • Busemann SokoleE et al.

    High count rates cause non-uniformities in cobalt-57 flood images

    Eur J Nucl Med

    (1993)
  • EnglishRJ et al.

    An iterative method for verifying systematic nonuniformities in refillable flood sources

    J Nucl Med Technol

    (1984)
  • OswaldWM et al.

    A noisy photomultiplier tube: Its unusual effect on gamma camera image uniformity

    J Nucl Med

    (1987)
  • ParasP et al.

    Quality control for scintillation cameras

  • LukesSJ et al.

    Thallium-201 imaging artifacts not detected by technetium-99m or cobalt-57 quality control testing

    Radiology

    (1983)
  • BonteFJ et al.

    Image aberrations produced by multichannel collimators for a scintillation camera

    Radiology

    (1971)
  • YehEL

    Distortion of bar-phantom image by collimator

    J Nucl Med

    (1979)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (31)

  • Single photon-emission computed tomography

    2010, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
  • Patterns, Variants, Artifacts, and Pitfalls in Conventional Radionuclide Bone Imaging and SPECT/CT

    2009, Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Further, intense tracer retention in the bladder is reported to cause pixel overload, resulting in a relatively cold area close to the region of interest of the femoral heads with consequent difficulty in interpretation.3,42,43 SPECT-only artifacts and conventional CT–only artifacts are widely reported,44-53 but artifacts occurring from the combination of modified CT scan and SPECT are less well known. The CT component of SPECT/CT can be used for both localization and for attenuation correction.

  • Collimator integrity

    2006, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text