Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of diabetic foot with suspected osteomyelitis

Ruolo della risonanza magnetica nello studio del piede diabetico con sospetta osteomielite

  • Musculoskeletal Radiology/Radiologia Muscolo-Scheletrica
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study evaluated Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in infected diabetic foot ulcers.

Materials and methods

Sixteen diabetic patients underwent foot MRI between January 2006 and September 2007 for suspected unilateral osteomyelitis. Three of 16 patients showed radiographic changes due to Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy. Twelve of 16 patients also underwent MR angiography of the lower limbs for the purpose of planning surgical or endovascular treatment. The musculoskeletal and vascular MRI studies were retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists.

Results

The final diagnosis, based on clinical, imaging, microbiological and histological findings, was osteomyelitis in 13/16 cases. Foot MRI allowed a correct diagnosis in 15/16 patients, with 1 false positive result demonstrated by computed tomography (CT)-guided bone biopsy. MR angiography of the lower limbs was considered nondiagnostic in 5/12 patients in the infrapopliteal region owing to venous contamination.

Conclusions

MRI has high sensitivity for the detection of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot but lower specificity related to Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy. If diagnostic uncertainty persists, a bone biopsy is indicated. The inflammatory hyperaemia caused by the ulcer deteriorates the diagnostic quality of 40%–50% of MR angiography studies in the infrapopliteal region. In these cases, selective arteriography is appropriate, as it can be performed in the same session as angioplasty.

Riassunto

Obiettivo

Valutare l’approccio con Risonanza Magnetica (RM) al piede diabetico con ulcera infetta.

Materiali e metodi

Sedici pazienti diabetici sono stati sottoposti da gennaio 2006 a settembre 2007 a RM del piede per sospetta osteomielite monolaterale; in 3/16 vi erano alterazioni radiografiche da osteo-artropatia neuropatica di Charcot. Dodici/16 pazienti hanno eseguito anche l’angio-RM degli arti inferiori per pianificare il trattamento chirurgico o endovascolare. Gli esami RM muscolo-scheletrici e vascolari sono stati valutati retrospettivamente da tre radiologi.

Risultati

La diagnosi finale, basata sui rilievi clinici, imaging, microbiologici e istologici è stata di osteomielite in 13/16 casi. La RM del piede ha consentito la diagnosi corretta in 15/16 pazienti, con 1 falso positivo, dimostrato dalla biopsia ossea TC-guidata. L’angio-RM degli arti inferiori è stata considerata non diagnostica nel distretto infra-popliteo in 5/12 pazienti a causa di artefatti da contaminazione venosa.

Conclusioni

La RM ha elevata sensibilità per l’osteomielite nel piede diabetico, ma più bassa specificità dovuta soprattutto all’osteo-artropatia neuropatica di Charcot; se permane dubbio diagnostico è indicata la biopsia ossea. L’iperemia flogistica causata dall’ulcera deteriora il 40%–50% degli studi angio-RM a livello sottopopliteo: in tali casi è appropriata l’arteriografia selettiva per la possibilità di effettuare angioplastica nella stessa seduta.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References/Bibliografia

  1. Ramsey SD, Newton K, Blough D et al (1999) Incidence, outcomes, and cost of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 22:382–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lipsky BA (1997) Osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetic patients. Clin Infect Dis 25:1318–1326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grayson ML, Gibbons GW, Balogh K et al (1995) Probing to bone in infected pedal ulcers: a clinical sign of underlying osteomyelitis in diabetic patients. JAMA 273:721–723

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. American Diabetes Association (2003) Peripheral arterial disease in people with diabetes. Diabetes Care 26:3333–3341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chanta DS, Cunningham PM, Schweitzer ME (2005) MR imaging of the diabetic foot: diagnostic challenges. Radiol Clin North Am 43:747–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hagspiel KD, Yao L, Paul Shih MC et al (2006) Comparison of multistation MR angiography with integrated parallel acquisition technique versus conventional technique with a dedicated phased-array coil system in peripheral vascular disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:263–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Granville Batte W et al (1998) Osteomyelitis of the foot: relative importance of primary and secondary MR imaging signs. Radiology 207:625–632

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Caputo GM, Cavanagh PR, Ulbrecht JS et al (1994) Assessment and management of foot disease in patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med 331:854–860

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Deery HG et al (2004) Diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clin Infect Dis 39:885–910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Wapner KL et al (1995) Osteomyelitis in feet of diabetics: clinical accuracy, surgical utility, and cost-effectiveness of MR imaging. Radiology 196:557–564

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vittorini E, Del Giudice E, Pizzoli A et al (2005) MRI versus scintigraphy with 99mTc-HMPAO-labelled granulocytes in the diagnosis of bone infection. Radiol Med 109:395–403

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahmadi ME, Morrison WB, Carrino JA et al (2006) Neuropathic arthropathy of the foot with and without superimposed osteomyelitis: MR imaging characteristics. Radiology 238:622–631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Craig GC, Amin MB, Wu K et al (1997) Osteomyelitis of the diabetic foot. MR imaging-pathologic correlation. Radiology 203:849–855

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Marcus CD, Ladam-Marcus VJ, Leone J et al (1996) MR imaging of osteomyelitis and neuropathic osteoarthropathy in the feet of diabetics. Radiographics 16:1337–1348

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brillet PY, Vayssairat M, Tassart M et al (2003) Gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography as first-line preoperative imaging in high-risk patients with lower limb ischemia. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:1139–1145

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ouwendijk R, Kock MCJM, van Dijk LC et al (2006) Vessel wall calcifications at multi-detector row CT Angiography in patients with peripheral arterial disease: effect on clinical utility and clinical predictors. Radiology 241:603–608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang Y, Winchester PA, Khilnani NM et al (2001) Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography from the abdominal aorta to the pedal arteries: combined dynamic two-dimensional and bolus-chase three-dimensional acquisitions. Invest Radiol 36:170–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Prince MR, Chabra SG, Watts R et al (2002) Contrast material travel times in patients undergoing peripheral MR angiography. Radiology 224:55–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Caudana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rozzanigo, U., Tagliani, A., Vittorini, E. et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of diabetic foot with suspected osteomyelitis. Radiol med 114, 121–132 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-008-0337-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-008-0337-7

Keywords

Parole chiave

Navigation