Abstract
Adverse reactions to intravenous iodinated contrast media may be classified as general and organ-specific, such as contrast-induced nephrotoxicity. General adverse reactions may be subclassified into acute and delayed types. Acute general adverse reactions can range from transient minor reactions to life-threatening severe reactions. Non-ionic contrast media have lower risk of mild and moderate adverse reactions. However, the risk of fatal reactions is similar for ionic and non-ionic contrast media. Adequate preprocedure evaluation should be performed to identify predisposing risk factors. Prompt recognition and treatment of acute adverse reactions is crucial. Risk of contrast induced nephrotoxicity can be reduced by use of non-ionic contrast media, less volume of contrast, and adequate hydration. The radiologist can play a pivotal role by being aware of predisposing factors, clinical presentation, and management of adverse reactions to contrast media.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Solomon R (2006) How large a problem is contrast-induced nephropathy? Decisions in imaging economics, November 2005. Available at: http://www.imagingeconomics.com/library/200511-14.asp, accessed on February 15
Webb JAW, Stacul F, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK (2003) Late adverse reactions to intravascular iodinated contrast media. Eur Radiol 13:181–184
ACR’s manual of contrast media, 5th edn. June 2004
Morcos SK, Thomsen HS (2001) Adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media. Eur Radiol 11:1267–1275
Thomsen HS, Bush WH (1998) Adverse effects of contrast media: incidence, prevention and management. Drug Safety 19:313–324
Thomsen HS, Dorph S (1993) High-osmolar and low-osmolar contrast media. An update on frequency of adverse drug reactions. Acta Radiol 3:205–209
Wysowski DK, Nourjah P (2006) Deaths attributed to X-ray contrast media on U.S. death certificates. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:613–615
Fischer H, Doust V (1992) An evaluation of pretesting in the problem of serious and fatal reactions to excretory urography. Radiology 103:497–501
Witten D (1975) Reactions to urographic contrast media. JAMA 231:974–977
Siegle R (1993) Rates of idiosyncratic reactions. Ionic versus nonionic contrast media. Invest Radiol 28:S95–S98
Siegle R, Halvorsen R, Dillon J et al (1991) The use of iohexol in patients with previous reactions to ionic contrast material. Invest Radiol 26:411–416
Lang D, Allpern M, Visintainer P et al (1991) Increased risk for anaphylactoid reaction from contrast media in patients on beta-adrenergic blockers or with asthma. Ann Intern Med 115:270–276
Greenberger P, Meyers S, Kramer B (1997) Effects of beta-adrenergic and calcium antagonists on the development of anaphylactoid reactions from radiographic contrast media during cardiac angiography. J Allergy Clin Immunol 80:698–702
Lasser EC, Berry CC, Mishkin MM et al (1994) Pretreatment with corticosteroids to prevent adverse reactions to nonionic contrast media. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:523–526
Greenberger PA, Paterson R. The prevention of immediate generalized reactions to radiocontrast media in high-risk patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol 87:867–872
Lasser EC, Berry CC, Talner LB et al (1988) Protective effects of corticosteroids in contrast material anaphylaxis. Invest Radiol 23:S193–S194
Lasser EC, Berry CC, Talner LB et al (1987) Pretreatment with corticosteroids to alleviate reactions to intravascular contrast media. N Engl J Med 317:845–849
Dawson P, Sidhu PS (1993) Is there a role for corticosteroid prophylaxis in patients at increased risk of adverse reactions to invascular contrast agents? Clin Radiol 48:225–226
Kelly JF, Patterson R, Lieberman P et al (1978) Radiographic contrast media studies in high-risk patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol 62:181–184
Davies P, Roberts MB, Roylance J (1975) Acute reactions to urographic contrast media. BMJ 2:434–437
Hartman GW, Hattery RR, Witten DM et al (1982) Mortality during excretory urography: Mayo clinic experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 139:919–922
Almen T (1994) The etiology of contrast medium reactions. Invest Radiol 29:S37–S45, (Suppl)
Katayama H (1996) Retrospective survey of iotrolan-280-induced late adverse reactions. Eur Radiol 6(Suppl 3):S11
Cohan RH, Ellis JH, Garner WL (1996) Extravasation of radiographic contrast material: recognition, prevention, and treatment. Radiology 200:593–604
Lin J, Bonventre JV (2005) Prevention of radiocontrast nephropathy. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 14:105–110
Tippins RB, Torres WE, Baumgartner BR, Baumgarten DA (2000) Are screening serum creatinine levels necessary before outpatient CT examinations? Radiology 216:481–484
Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D (1999) A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Ann Intern Med 130:461–470
Namasivayam S, Kalra MK, Ritchie JC et al (2005) Role of reagent strip based rapid creatinine meter in patients undergoing contrast enhanced radiological studies. Presented as a hot topic in the Radiologic Society of North America Annual Meeting
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Namasivayam, S., Kalra, M.K., Torres, W.E. et al. Adverse reactions to intravenous iodinated contrast media: a primer for radiologists. Emerg Radiol 12, 210–215 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-006-0488-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-006-0488-6