Fever of unknown origin: prospective comparison of [¹⁸F]FDG imaging with a double-head coincidence camera and gallium-67 citrate SPET

Abstract.

Gallium-67 citrate is currently considered as the tracer of first choice in the diagnostic workup of fever of unknown origin (FUO). Fluorine-18 2'-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) has been shown to accumulate in malignant tumours but also in inflammatory processes. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate FDG imaging with a double-head coincidence camera (DHCC) in patients with FUO in comparison with planar and single-photon emission tomography (SPET) ⁶⁷Ga citrate scanning. Twenty FUO patients underwent FDG imaging with a DHCC which included transaxial and longitudinal whole-body tomography. In 18 of these subjects, ⁶⁷Ga citrate whole-body and SPET imaging was performed. The ⁶⁷Ga citrate and FDG images were interpreted by two investigators, both blinded to the results of other diagnostic modalities. Forty percent (8/20) of the patients had infection, 25% (5/20) had auto-immune diseases, 10% (2/20) had neoplasms and 15% (3/20) had other diseases. Fever remained unexplained in 10% (2/20) of the patients. Of the 20 patients studied, FDG imaging was positive and essentially contributed to the final diagnosis in 11 (55%). The sensitivity of transaxial FDG tomography in detecting the focus of fever was 84% and the specificity, 86%. Positive and negative predictive values were 92% and 75%, respectively. If the analysis was restricted to the 18 patients who were investigated both with ⁶⁷Ga citrate and FDG, sensitivity was 81% and specificity, 86%. Positive and negative predictive values were 90% and 75%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of whole-body FDG tomography (again restricted to the aforementioned 18 patients) was lower (sensitivity, 36%; specificity, 86%; positive and negative predictive values, 80% and 46%, respectively). ⁶⁷Ga citrate SPET yielded a sensitivity of 67% in detecting the focus of fever and a specificity of 78%. Positive and negative predictive values were 75% and 70%, respectively. A low sensitivity (45%), but combined with a high specificity (100%), was found in planar ⁶⁷Ga imaging. Positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 54%, respectively. It is concluded that in the context of FUO, transaxial FDG tomography performed with a DHCC is superior to ⁶⁷Ga citrate SPET. This seems to be the consequence of superior tracer kinetics of FDG compared with those of ⁶⁷Ga citrate and of a better spatial resolution of a DHCC system compared with SPET imaging. In patients with FUO, FDG imaging with either dedicated PET or DHCC should be considered the procedure of choice.