Abstract
Purpose
In nuclear medicine, radiopharmaceuticals are usually administered in unit doses partitioned from multi-dose vials. The partitioning typically takes place in a radiopharmacy, depending on local practice. Automatic, as opposed to manual, partitioning and administration should reduce radiation exposure of the personnel involved, improve the accuracy of the administration and mitigate contamination. This study set out to verify and validate the 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) administration procedure performed using Intego™ (MEDRAD, Inc., Warrendale, PA, USA), a combined dispenser and injector system. We considered maintenance of sterility and the system’s potential to improve, with respect to the manual procedure, the accuracy of net administered 18F-FDG radioactivity in patients and the radiation protection of operators.
Methods
A media-fill procedure was used to assess whether sterility is maintained during use of the Intego™ system. Simulating a typical working day’s setup and use of the system, we investigated the accuracy of the net administered 18F-FDG activity obtained with Intego™ versus the manual dose delivery system. We also measured personnel radiation exposure during use of Intego™ and during manual administration and recorded and compared environmental doses in the two conditions.
Results
The radiopharmaceutical remained sterile in all the tests performed. The accuracy of the net 18F-FDG activity delivered to the patients was found to be within 3 % points, as required by European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) guidelines on 18F-FDG imaging procedures. With Intego™, the residual radioactivity in the tubing was 0.20 MBq, corresponding to approximately 0.07 % of the mean activity delivered. With manual injection, the residual radioactivity in the syringe averaged 7.37 MBq, corresponding to a mean error of 2.9 % in the delivered dose. During the injection step of the positron emission tomography (PET) procedure, whole-body and extremity radiation exposures were significantly reduced with Intego™ by 38 and by 94 %, respectively, compared to the levels associated with manual administration (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
Intego™accurately partitions and administers sterile doses of 18F-FDG from multi-dose vials. Compared with standard manual 18F-FDG administration, the new procedure with an automatic dispensing and injection system greatly reduces the extremity dose to the operator involved in the administration of the radiopharmaceutical.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sirna V, Garaboldi L, Papi S, Martano L, Omodeo Salè E, Paganelli G, et al. Testing of microbial contamination during the preparation of the radiocompound [90Y]DOTATOC for clinical trials: a process validation study by Media Fill approach. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;54(5):553–9.
Biran T, Weininger J, Malchi S, Marciano R, Chisin R. Measurements of occupational exposure for a technologist performing 18F FDG PET scans. Health Phys 2004;87(5):539–44.
Benatar NA, Cronin BF, O’Doherty MJ. Radiation dose rates from patients undergoing PET: implications for technologists and waiting areas. Eur J Nucl Med 2000;27(5):583–9.
Seierstad T, Stranden E, Bjering K, Evensen M, Holt A, Michalsen HM, et al. Doses to nuclear technicians in a dedicated PET/CT centre utilising 18F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2007;123(2):246–9.
Guillet B, Quentin P, Waultier S, Bourrelly M, Pisano P, Mundler OJ. Technologist radiation exposure in routine clinical practice with 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med Technol 2005;33(3):175–9.
Covens P, Berus D, Vanhavere F, Caveliers V. The introduction of automated dispensing and injection during PET procedures: a step in the optimisation of extremity doses and whole-body doses of nuclear medicine staff. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010;140(3):250–8.
Boellaard R, O’Doherty MJ, Weber WA, Mottaghy FM, Lonsdale MN, Stroobants SG, et al. FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;37(1):181–200.
Sans Merce M, Ruiz N, Barth I, Carnicer A, Donadille L, Ferrari P, et al. Extremity exposure in nuclear medicine: preliminary results of a European study. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2011;144(1-4):515–20.
Zanzonico P, Dauer L, St Germain J. Operational radiation safety for PET-CT, SPECT-CT, and cyclotron facilities. Health Phys 2008;95:554–70.
Roberts FO, Gunawardana DH, Pathmaraj K, Wallace A, U PL, Mi T, et al. Radiation dose to PET technologists and strategies to lower occupational exposure. J Nucl Med Technol 2005;33(1):44–7.
Kop JMM, Kemerink GJ, Ollers MC, Pakbiers MTW. Optimisation of radiation protection as a result of PET/CT applications. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference of the IRPA, 19–24 October 2008. Available via www.irpa12.org.ar.
Demir M, Demir B, Yaşar D, Sayman HB, Halac M, Ahmed AS, et al. Radiation doses to technologists working with 18F-FDG in a PET center with high patient capacity. Nukleonika 2010;55(1):107–12.
Tandon P, Venkatesh M, Bhatt BC. Extremity dosimetry for radiation workers handling unsealed radionuclides in nuclear medicine departments in India. Health Phys 2007;92(2):112–8.
Acknowledgment
The authors are grateful to Ms. Catherine Wrenn for her advice and skilful editorial support. This research was partially supported by a grant from MEDRAD.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lecchi, M., Lucignani, G., Maioli, C. et al. Validation of a new protocol for 18F-FDG infusion using an automatic combined dispenser and injector system. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39, 1720–1729 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2174-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2174-0