Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal dose of 18F-FDG required for whole-body PET using an LSO PET camera

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reducing the acquisition time of whole-body fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) (corrected for attenuation) is of major importance in clinical practice. With the introduction of lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO), the acquisition time can be dramatically reduced, provided that patients are injected with larger amounts of tracer and/or the system is operated in 3D mode. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal dose of 18F-FDG required in order to achieve good-to-excellent image quality when a "3-min emission, 2-min transmission/bed position" protocol is used for an LSO PET camera. A total of 218 consecutive whole-body 18F-FDG PET studies were evaluated retrospectively. After excluding patients with liver metastases, hyperglycaemia and paravenous injections, the final study population consisted of 186 subjects (112 men, 74 women, age 59±15 years). Patients were injected with an activity of 18F-FDG ranging from 2.23 to 15.21 MBq/kg. Whole-body images corrected for attenuation (3 min emission, 2 min transmission/bed position) were acquired with an LSO PET camera (Ecat Accel,Siemens) 60 min after tracer administration. Patients were positioned with their arms along the body. Image reconstruction was done iteratively and a post-reconstruction filter was applied. Image quality was scored visually by two independent observers using a five-point scoring scale (poor, reasonable, good, very good, excellent). In addition, the coefficient of variability (COV) was measured in a region of interest over the liver in order to quantify noise. Of the images obtained in 118 patients injected with ≥8 MBq/kg 18F-FDG, 92% and 90% were classified as good, very good or excellent by observer 1 and observer 2, respectively. The COV averaged 10.63%±3.19% for doses ≥8 MBq/kg and 16.46%±5.14% for doses <8 MBq/kg. Administration of an 18F-FDG dose of ≥8 MBq/kg results in images of good to excellent quality in the vast majority of patients when using an LSO PET camera and applying a 3-min emission, 2-min transmission/bed position acquisition protocol. At lower doses, a rapid decline in image quality and increasing noise are observed. Alternative protocols should be adopted in order to compensate for the loss in image quality when doses <8 MBq/kg are used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nutt J. Is LSO the future for PET? R. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002; 29:1523–1525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Strother SC, Casey ME, Hoffman EJ. Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating count rates to signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalent counts. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1990; 37:783–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cherry SR, Dalhbom M, Hoffman EJ. 3D PET using a conventional multislice tomograph without septa. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15:655–668.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lartizien C, Comtat C, Kinahan PE, Ferreira N, Bendriem B, Trebossen R. Optimization of injected dose based on noise equivalent count rates for 2- and 3-dimensional whole-body PET. J Nucl Med 2002; 43:1268–1278.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hendrik Everaert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Everaert, H., Vanhove, C., Lahoutte, T. et al. Optimal dose of 18F-FDG required for whole-body PET using an LSO PET camera. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30, 1615–1619 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1317-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1317-8

Keywords

Navigation