Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of dynamic lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe guidance on sentinel node biopsy in melanoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In cutaneous melanoma, biopsy of the first tumour-draining lymph node (sentinel node, SN) may replace routine elective lymph node dissection (ELND). Even in experienced hands the original technique using vital dyes fails to localise the SN in 20% of cases. In this study we investigated whether the procedure benefits from lymphoscintigraphy and the use of a gamma probe. In 41 patients technetium-99m-colloidal albumin was injected intracutaneously around the scar of the excised tumour. This was followed by dynamic and late static imaging. The first focal accumulation was assumed to be the SN. In all patients at least one SN was found, in 95% within the first 20 min. By showing multiple or ramifying lymphatic channels, dynamic lymphoscintigraphy differentiated between spill and multiple SNs. In all cases the initial focus retained the highest fraction of radioactivity for at least 18 h. The gamma probe was especially useful in the axilla and neck, where it accurately showed the optimal incision site and facilitated the search for deep-seated nodes. Gamma probe-localised SNs were dye-positive in 93% of cases. The SN contained metastases in 20% of the patients. Only in these patients was ELND performed, which revealed that the SN had been the only metastatic node in four of eight cases. We conclude that dynamic lymphoscintigraphy is essential for SN localisation, that tracer kinetics allow flexible timing of surgery, and that the surgical procedure benefits from use of the gamma probe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balch CM, Houghton A, Peters L. Cutaneous melanoma. In: DeVita VT jr, Hellmann S, Rostenberg SA, eds.Cancer — principles and practice of oncology, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott: 1989: 1499–1542.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, Exonomou JS, Cagle LA, Storm FK, Foshag LJ, Cochran AJ. Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma.Arch Surg 1992; 127: 392–399.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blach CM. Surgical management of regional lymph nodes in cutaneous melanoma.J Am Acad Dermatol 1980; 3: 511–524.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balch CM. The role of elective lymph node dissection in melanoma: rationale, results, and controversies.J Clin Oncol 1988; 6: 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cady B. “Prophylactic” lymph node dissection in melanoma: does it help? [editorial].J Clin Oncol 1988; 6: 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reintgen DS, Cox EB, McCarthy KS, Vollmer RT, Seigler HE. Efficacy of lymph node dissection in patients with intermediate thickness primary melanoma.Ann Surg 1983; 198: 379–384.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Milton GW, Shaw HM, McCarthy WH, Pearson L, Balch CM, Soong S-J. Prophylactic lymph node dissection in stage I cutaneous malignant melanoma: results of surgical treatment in 1319 patients.Br J Surg 1982; 69: 108–111.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Veronesi U, Adamus J, Bandiera DC, et al. Delayed regional lymph node dissection in stage I melanoma of the skin of the lower extremities.Cancer 1982; 49: 2420–2430.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sugarbaker EV, McBride CM. Melanoma of the trunk: the results of surgical excision and anatomic guidelines for predicting nodal metastasis.Surgery 1976; 80: 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morton DL, Wen DR, Foshag LJ, Essner R, Cochran A. Intraoperative lymphatic mapping and selective cervical lymphadenectomy for early-stage melanomas of the head and neck.J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 1751–1756.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alex JC, Weaver DL, Fairbank JT, Rankin BS, Krag DN. Gamma-probe-guided lymph node localization in malignant melanoma.Surg Oncol 1993; 2: 303–308.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Uren RF, Howman-Giles RB, Shaw HM, Thompson JF, McCarthy WH. Lymphoscintigraphy in high-risk melanoma of the trunk: predicting draining node groups, defining lymphatic channels and locating the sentinel node.J Nucl Med 1993; 34: 1435–1440

    Google Scholar 

  13. Veen H, Hoekstra OS, Paul MA, Cuesta MA, Meijer S. Gamma probe guided sentinel node biopsy to select patients with melanoma for lymphadenectomy.Br J Surg 1994; 81: 1769–1770.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Uren RF, Howman-Giles R, Thompson JF, Shaw HM, Quinn MJ, O'Brien CJ, McCarthy WH. Lymphoscintigraphy to identify sentinel lymph nodes in patients with melanoma.Melanoma Res 1994; 4: 395–399.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pijpers, R., Collet, G.J., Meijer, S. et al. The impact of dynamic lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe guidance on sentinel node biopsy in melanoma. Eur J Nucl Med 22, 1238–1241 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00801606

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00801606

Key words

Navigation