TABLE 6

Correlation Between Texture Features of SS and CBM Images Derived from 2 Observers

ObserverResampling methodDiscrete valueGLZLM
HomogeneityEnergyContrastEntropyDissimilaritySRELREHGRELRHGEGLNURPSZEZP
1FBS640.96 (<0.001)0.99 (<0.001)0.97 (<0.001)0.99 (<0.001)0.99 (<0.001)0.95 (<0.001)
1280.87 (<0.001)0.96 (<0.001)0.99 (<0.001)0.99 (<0.001)
FBN640.88 (<0.001)0.98 (<0.001)0.90 (<0.001)0.66 (<0.001)0.63 (<0.001)1.00 (<0.001)0.66 (<0.001)0.61 (<0.001)0.70 (<0.001)
1280.83 (<0.001)0.98 (<0.001)0.90 (<0.001)0.27 (0.170)0.17 (0.391)1.00 (<0.001)0.31 (0.115)0.23 (0.258)0.29 (0.141)
2FBS640.96 (<0.001)0.99 (<0.001)0.97 (<0.001)0.99 (<0.001)0.99 (<0.001)0.95 (<0.001)
1280.87 (<0.001)0.96 (<0.001)0.99 (<0.001)0.99 (<0.001)
FBN640.84 (<0.001)0.97 (<0.001)0.88 (<0.001)0.62 (<0.001)0.62 (<0.001)1.00 (<0.001)0.64 (<0.001)0.53 (0.005)0.65 (<0.001)
1280.80 (<0.001)0.97 (<0.001)0.88 (<0.001)0.23 (0.244)0.08 (0.696)1.00 (<0.001)0.25 (0.200)0.19 (0.340)0.28 (0.161)
  • Abbreviations are listed in Table 1 or defined in the article. Data are expressed as r value followed by P value in parentheses.