TABLE 6

Diagnostic Performance of 18F-Fluoroestradiol PET Versus Immunohistochemistry in 12 Studies

Definition of ER+
StudynSensitivitySpecificityIHCPET
Peterson (31)
 Nonbreast100.99 (0.67–1)0.96 (0.33–1)Allred score > 2SUVmean > 1.5
 Breast40.98 (0.50–1)IndeterminateAllred score > 2SUVmean > 1.5
Venema (37)130.99 (0.73–1)0.96 (0.33–1)≥1% of cellsSUVmax > 1.5
Gemignani (29)480.85 (0.71–0.93)0.74 (0.41–0.93)≥1% of cellsSUVmean > 1.5
Yang (35)180.99 (0.73–1)0.85 (0.48–0.97)≥1% of cellsSUVmax > 1.5
Peterson (38)
 Nonbreast30.97 (0.43–1)0.96 (0.33–1)≥5% of cellsSUVmean > 1
 Breast90.99 (0.69–1)0.66 (0.21–0.93)≥5% of cellsSUVmean > 1
Gupta (39)
 Nonbreast40.98 (0.50–1)IndeterminateAll ER+ were ≥15% of cellsQualitative
 Breast60.98 (0.60–1)Indeterminate
 Unclear location2
Chae (40)850.77 (0.63–0.86)1.00 (0.90–1)Allred score ≥ 3Qualitative
Chae (30)240.92 (0.75–0.98)IndeterminateAllred score ≥ 6Qualitative
Dehdashti (41)110.69 (0.44–0.86)1 (0.83–1)RBA, >3 fmol/mg or IHC*Qualitative
Mintun (42)80.99 (0.67–1)0.05 (0–0.67)RBA, >3 fmol/mgQualitative
Mortimer (43)160.76 (0.55–0.89)1 (0.83–1)RBA, >3 fmol/mg or IHC*Qualitative
van Kruchten (4)220.95 (0.79–0.99)0.99 (0.71–1)IHC* or clinical outcomeSUVmax > 1.5
  • * Criteria not stated.

  • IHC = immunohistochemistry; RBA = radioligand binding affinity (50).

  • Data in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.