TABLE 4

Observer Scores of Preference in Paired Scans with Statistical Significance

Patient no.2D 2 min vs. 2D 4 min2D 2 min vs. 2D 3 min2D 3 min vs. 2D 4 min3D 2 min vs. 3D 4 min3D 2 min vs. 3D 3 min3D 3 min vs. 3D 4 min2D 2 min vs. 3D 2 min2D 3 min vs. 3D 3 min2D 4 min vs. 3D 4 min
1−10−1+2+1+10+1+2
2−10+1−10−1−1+2−1
3000−10+10+2+1
4+1+1−1+1+10+2+2+1
5−100+2−10+1+2+2
6−1−10+1−1−1+1+1+1
7+2+10−2+1−1−1+2+1
8+1−1−1−1−1+1+1+1+1
9−2−100000+2+2
10+2+2+1+2+1+1−2+1+2
110+1−1−100+1+1+2
120−2+100+1−1+1+1
13+2+1+2+1+1+10+1+1
14000000000
Mean0.140.070.070.210.140.210.071.361.14
SE0.350.290.250.350.210.210.290.170.23
95% CI−0.60 to −0.89−0.55 to −0.69−0.46 to −0.60−0.54 to −0.97−0.30 to −0.59−0.25 to −0.68−0.55 to −0.690.99 to −1.720.64 to −1.64
P0.340.40.390.280.250.170.40.00010.0001
Scan choiceNonNonNonNonNonNonNon3D3D
  • Non = No significant preference between scans was observed.

  • Score of 0 suggested no preference; score of +1 implied second scan was superior, whereas −1 signified that first scan was superior. Similarly, score of ±2 indicated one scan, compared with other, was far superior.