Contribution of Each Processing Method to Bleed Localization
| Processing method | n | Mean contribution (%) | 95% CI of mean (%) | P against conventional | P against reference subtraction | P against alternate sequential subtraction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional | 30 | 87.3 | 81.1–93.6 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Reference subtraction | 30 | 10.0 | 4.2–15.8 | <0.001 | 0.015 | |
| Alternate sequential subtraction | 30 | 2.7 | 1.1–4.2 | <0.001 | 0.015 |
Statistically significant differences between means are supported by lack of overlap of 95% CIs.