TABLE 2.

Predictive Capability of DACS Parameters for Abnormal Results Compared with Conventional GES

DACS grouping by…Overall (n = 121)Conventional GES resultsP*Raw odds ratio95% CI
Abnormal (n = 53)Normal (patients + healthy volunteers) (n = 68)
Percentage total, 30 min0.001
 Abnormal, <31% or >63%30 (27.5%)21 (43.8%)9 (14.8%)4.491.81–11.15
 Normal, 31%–63%79 (72.5%)27 (56.3%)52 (85.2%)Reference
Percentage total, 60 min0.17
 Abnormal, <19% or >62%9 (7.6%)6 (11.8%)3 (4.5%)2.840.68–11.97
 Normal, 19%–62%109 (92.4%)45 (88.2%)64 (95.5%)Reference
Percentage total, 120 min0.21
 Abnormal, <32% or >61%34 (35.1%)21 (41.2%)13 (28.3%)1.780.76–4.16
 Normal, 32%–61%63 (64.9%)30 (58.8%)33 (71.7%)Reference
Proximal-to-distal ratio, 30 min1.00
 Abnormal, <0.36 or >6.627 (6.4%)3 (6.3%)4 (6.6%)0.950.20–4.46
 Normal, 0.36–6.62102 (93.6%)45 (93.8%)57 (93.4%)Reference
Proximal-to-distal ratio, 60 min0.017
 Abnormal, <0.88 or >3.1539 (33.3%)23 (46.0%)16 (23.9%)2.721.23–5.99
 Normal, 0.88–3.1578 (66.7%)27 (54.0%)51 (76.1%)Reference
Proximal-to-distal ratio, 120 min0.83
 Abnormal, <1.25 or >6.3837 (38.9%)20 (40.8%)17 (37.0%)1.180.51–2.69
 Normal, 1.25–6.3858 (61.1%)29 (59.2%)29 (63.0%)Reference
EF, 30 min0.48
 Abnormal, <14% or >36%25 (24.8%)12 (29.3%)13 (21.7%)1.500.60–3.72
 Normal, 14%–36%76 (75.2%)29 (70.7%)47 (78.3%)Reference
EF, 60 min0.011
 Abnormal, <19% or >40%24 (22.6%)16 (34.8%)8 (13.3%)3.471.33–9.06
 Normal, 19%–40%82 (77.4%)30 (65.2%)52 (86.7%)Reference
EF, 120 min0.26
 Abnormal, <11% or >41%15 (18.3%)10 (23.3%)5 (12.8%)2.060.64–6.68
 Normal, 11%–41%67 (81.7%)33 (76.7%)34 (87.2%)Reference
Frequency, 30 min0.047
 Abnormal, <2.67 or >3.3311 (10.9%)8 (19.5%)3 (5.0%)4.611.14–18.57
 Normal, 2.67–3.3390 (89.1%)33 (80.5%)57 (95.0%)Reference
Frequency, 60 min0.32
 Abnormal, <2.76 or >3.4810 (9.4%)6 (13.0%)4 (6.7%)2.100.56–7.93
 Normal, 2.76–3.4896 (90.6%)40 (87.0%)56 (93.3%)Reference
Frequency, 120 min1.00
 Abnormal, <2.42 or >3.2011 (13.4%)6 (14.0%)5 (12.8%)1.100.31–3.95
 Normal, 2.42–3.2071 (86.6%)37 (86.0%)34 (87.2%)Reference
  • * P value for testing association of DACS abnormality with standard clinical diagnosis based on conventional GES using Fisher exact test.

  • Raw odds ratio of being diagnosed as abnormal by conventional GES comparing DACS abnormal to normal.