RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 The Impact of Covid-19 on First Year Undergraduate Nuclear Medicine Students' Practical Skills Training JF Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology JO J. Nucl. Med. Technol. FD Society of Nuclear Medicine SP jnmt.121.262814 DO 10.2967/jnmt.121.262814 A1 Melissa Shields A1 Helen Warren-Forward YR 2021 UL http://tech.snmjournals.org/content/early/2021/11/08/jnmt.121.262814.abstract AB RATIONALE: Clinical placement is an important component of any undergraduate nuclear medicine program. For first year students, it is an introduction to clinical nuclear medicine which helps them better understand the profession as well as consolidate their learning to date. At The University of Newcastle, Australia part of the clinical placement course includes radiopharmacy laboratory sessions in a simulated environment to develop necessary skills and confidence. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, restrictions were put in place that meant that clinical placements for first year students were cancelled and time in the radiopharmacy laboratory was reduced from two hours to one hour per session. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether a clinical alternative portfolio in lieu of clinical placement was effective in increasing the students’ knowledge and skills in nuclear medicine practice and if specifically developed instructional videos for preparation of the radiopharmacy laboratories compensated for the reduced time. METHODS: A paper-based survey was given to the 50 students enrolled in the first-year professional practice course. This survey containing 56 questions consisted of both open questions and closed Likert-scale questions about the changes to the radiopharmacy laboratories and the clinical alternative portfolio in two separate sections. Quantitative and qualitative analysis was performed on the resulting data. RESULTS: There was a 94% response rate to the survey. The majority of students watched the preparatory radiopharmacy videos at least once and strongly agreeing that each video adequately prepared them for the associated lab session. Just over half (51%) of the students though the reduced time in the lab was sufficient to complete the required tasks. The majority of students agreed that the modules included in the clinical alternative portfolio increased their knowledge of nuclear medicine practice. CONCLUSION: In spite of the restrictions put in place due to Covid-19, the learning outcomes of the first-year nuclear medicine professional practice course were met. The preparatory videos for the radiopharmacy laboratories and the clinical alternative portfolio was positively received and gave the students a good introduction to clinical nuclear medicine.