PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - James M. Provenzale
AU  - Robert J. Stanley
TI  - A Systematic Guide to Reviewing a Manuscript
DP  - 2006 Jun 01
TA  - Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
PG  - 92--99
VI  - 34
IP  - 2
4099  - http://tech.snmjournals.org/content/34/2/92.short
4100  - http://tech.snmjournals.org/content/34/2/92.full
SO  - J. Nucl. Med. Technol.2006 Jun 01; 34
AB  - OBJECTIVE. In this article, we provide a step-by-step guide to reviewing a manuscript that we hope will improve the quality of reviews for the AJR. CONCLUSION. We have provided a detailed series of guidelines for providing excellent reviews of manuscripts. The template we have provided can be used to serve as a checklist for important questions to ask about manuscripts during the review process. Finally, the principles presented here also can be used as a guide for authors by providing a list of important features to include during manuscript preparation and thereby prospectively address questions that good reviewers are likely to ask.