%0 Journal Article %A James M. Provenzale %A Robert J. Stanley %T A Systematic Guide to Reviewing a Manuscript %D 2006 %J Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology %P 92-99 %V 34 %N 2 %X OBJECTIVE. In this article, we provide a step-by-step guide to reviewing a manuscript that we hope will improve the quality of reviews for the AJR. CONCLUSION. We have provided a detailed series of guidelines for providing excellent reviews of manuscripts. The template we have provided can be used to serve as a checklist for important questions to ask about manuscripts during the review process. Finally, the principles presented here also can be used as a guide for authors by providing a list of important features to include during manuscript preparation and thereby prospectively address questions that good reviewers are likely to ask. %U https://tech.snmjournals.org/content/jnmt/34/2/92.full.pdf