TY - JOUR T1 - The Effect of an Asymmetric Energy Window on Bone Scintigraphy Image Quality JF - Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology JO - J. Nucl. Med. Technol. SP - 46 LP - 50 DO - 10.2967/jnmt.119.233577 VL - 48 IS - 1 AU - Joana do Mar F. Machado AU - Susan Doshi AU - Ruth Smith AU - Martyn Evans AU - Richard N.J. Graham AU - Stewart Redman AU - David Little Y1 - 2020/03/01 UR - http://tech.snmjournals.org/content/48/1/46.abstract N2 - Bone scintigraphy is one of the most common nuclear medicine tests. Previous work investigated the effectiveness of an asymmetric window (ASW) for planar bone scintigraphy using simulation and phantom data. Phantom studies concluded that the ASW improved both the resolution and the contrast-to-noise ratio when imaging objects with high scatter. The aim of this study was to confirm this improvement increased image quality in patients. This study also investigated whether the differences between a symmetric window (SW) and an ASW depended on body mass index. Methods: Fifty-eight patients had 2 scans: a standard scan using an SW of 140 keV ± 10% and a scan using an ASW of 140 keV + 10% and − 7.5%. Three readers independently compared the 2 image sets and scored them using a 5-score scale (ranging from 1 = ASW better [clinically important] to 5 = SW better [clinically important]). Scores from all radiologists were pooled and analyzed statistically. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In 93 cases (53%), the readers scored the ASW images better than the SW images. In 5 cases (3%), the ASW images were preferred, with the difference considered clinically important; there were no cases in which the SW was similarly preferred. For the sign test, we determined whether the total of 93 scores of 1 or 2 (ASW preferred) was significantly different from the 15 scores of 4 or 5 (SW preferred). The P value was less than 0.00001, demonstrating that the difference was significant. Conclusion: In patients undergoing bone scintigraphy, ASW provided an improvement in image quality that in some cases was judged clinically important. ER -