PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Al-Shakhrah, Issa A. TI - Investigation of the Importance of Applying Various Methods of Calculation in Determining the Blood-Absorbed Dose for Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma AID - 10.2967/jnmt.122.265214 DP - 2023 Dec 01 TA - Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology PG - 296--301 VI - 51 IP - 4 4099 - http://tech.snmjournals.org/content/51/4/296.short 4100 - http://tech.snmjournals.org/content/51/4/296.full SO - J. Nucl. Med. Technol.2023 Dec 01; 51 AB - The objective was to compare estimated total blood-absorbed doses obtained by applying 4 methods to the same group of patients. In addition, these results were compared with those for the patients of other researchers, who used various other techniques over a period of more than 20 y. Methods: Twenty-seven patients (22 women and 5 men) with differentiated thyroid carcinoma were enrolled in the study. Whole-body measurements were performed as conjugate-view (anterior and posterior) counts by scintillation camera imaging. All patients received 3.7 GBq of 131I for thyroid ablation. Results: The mean total blood-absorbed doses by the first, second, third, and fourth methods in the 27 patients were estimated to be 0.46 ± 0.12, 0.45 ± 0.13, 0.46 ± 0.19, and 0.62 ± 0.23 Gy, respectively. The maximum values were 1.40, 0.81, 1.04. and 1.33 Gy, respectively. The difference between the mean values was 37.22%. In the comparison with the total blood-absorbed doses for the patients of other researchers, the difference was 50.77% (difference between the means of 0.65 and 0.32 Gy). Conclusion: None of the total absorbed doses to the blood by the 4 methods in my 27 patients was 2 Gy, the maximum permissible dose. The difference between the total absorbed doses to the blood obtained by different teams of researchers was 50.77%, whereas the difference between the values by the 4 different methods in the 27 patients was 37.22%.