Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Continuing Education
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Contact
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Continuing Education
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Contact
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
OtherQuality & Practice Management (JNMT)
Open Access

Findings from Quality Improvement Initiatives to Assess and Improve PET/CT FDG Injection Infiltration Rates in Multiple Centers

Terence Z. Wong, Thad Benefield, Shane C. Masters, Jackson W. Kiser, James R. Crowley, Dustin Osborne, Osama Mawlawi, James Barnwell, Pawan Gupta, Akiva Mintz, Kelley A. Ryan, Steven R. Perrin, Ronald K. Lattanze and David W. Townsend
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology June 2019, jnmt.119.228098; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.119.228098
Terence Z. Wong
1 Duke University Medical Center, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thad Benefield
2 University of North Carolina, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shane C. Masters
3 Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jackson W. Kiser
4 Carilion Clinic, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James R. Crowley
4 Carilion Clinic, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dustin Osborne
5 University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine Radiology/Molecular Imaging & Translational Res;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Osama Mawlawi
6 MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Barnwell
7 Wake Radiology, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pawan Gupta
8 Division of Nuclear Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Health, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Akiva Mintz
9 Columbia University Medical Center, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kelley A. Ryan kryan@luce
10 Lucerno Dynamics, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven R. Perrin
10 Lucerno Dynamics, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald K. Lattanze
10 Lucerno Dynamics, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David W. Townsend
11 National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

PET/CT radiotracer infiltrations are not uncommon and often outside imaging fields of view. Infiltrations can negatively impact image quality and quantification, and can adversely affect patient management. Until recently, there has not been a simple way to routinely practice PET radiopharmaceutical administration quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA). Our objectives were to quantify infiltration rates, determine associative factors for infiltrations, and to assess if rates could be reduced and sustained at multiple centers. Methods: A Design, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control quality improvement (QI) methodology requiring novel technology was used to try to improve PET/CT injection quality. Teams were educated on the importance of quality injections. Baseline infiltration rates were measured, center-specific associative factors were analyzed, team meetings were held, improvement plans were established and executed, and rates remeasured. To ensure injection quality gains were retained, real-time feedback and ongoing monitoring were used. Sustainability was assessed. Results: Seven centers and 56 technologists provided data on 5,541 injections. The centers’ aggregated baseline infiltration rate was 6.2% (range 2% - 16%). Based on their specific associative factors, four centers developed improvement plans and reduced their aggregated infiltration rate from 8.9% to 4.6% (P < 0.0001). On-going injection monitoring showed sustainability. Significant center- and technologist-level infiltration rate variation was found (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0020). Conclusion: A QI approach with new technology can help centers measure infiltration rates, determine associative factors, implement interventions, and improve/sustain injection quality. Since PET/CT images help guide patient management, monitoring and improving radiotracer injection quality is important.

  • PET/CT
  • Quality Assurance
  • Extravasations
  • FDG
  • Infiltrations
  • PET/CT
  • Quality Improvement

Footnotes

  • Immediate Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY) allows users to share and adapt with attribution, excluding materials credited to previous publications. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Details: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/site/misc/permission.xhtml.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 51 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 51, Issue 1
March 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Findings from Quality Improvement Initiatives to Assess and Improve PET/CT FDG Injection Infiltration Rates in Multiple Centers
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Findings from Quality Improvement Initiatives to Assess and Improve PET/CT FDG Injection Infiltration Rates in Multiple Centers
Terence Z. Wong, Thad Benefield, Shane C. Masters, Jackson W. Kiser, James R. Crowley, Dustin Osborne, Osama Mawlawi, James Barnwell, Pawan Gupta, Akiva Mintz, Kelley A. Ryan, Steven R. Perrin, Ronald K. Lattanze, David W. Townsend
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2019, jnmt.119.228098; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.119.228098

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Findings from Quality Improvement Initiatives to Assess and Improve PET/CT FDG Injection Infiltration Rates in Multiple Centers
Terence Z. Wong, Thad Benefield, Shane C. Masters, Jackson W. Kiser, James R. Crowley, Dustin Osborne, Osama Mawlawi, James Barnwell, Pawan Gupta, Akiva Mintz, Kelley A. Ryan, Steven R. Perrin, Ronald K. Lattanze, David W. Townsend
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2019, jnmt.119.228098; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.119.228098
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Topical Sensor for the Assessment of PET Dose Administration: Metric Performance with an Autoinjector
  • Detection of 18F-FDG Dose Leakage Using a Topical Device
  • Its Time to Celebrate!
  • 2019: A Year of Reflection
  • 2019: A Year of Reflection
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • PET/CT
  • quality assurance
  • Extravasations
  • FDG
  • Infiltrations
  • quality improvement
SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Powered by HighWire