TABLE 3

Comparison of EDV, ESV, and LVEF for Conventional SPECT, IQ•SPECT, and Echocardiography

ParameterConventionalIQEchoConventional vs. IQConventional vs. echoIQ vs. echo
QGS
 EDV (mL)77.0 ± 39.174.2 ± 36.8110.6 ± 38.3r = 0.98r = 0.77r = 0.77
 ESV (mL)30.0 ± 29.227.4 ± 27.340.6 ± 26.7r = 0.97r = 0.81r = 0.82
 LVEF (%)65.4 ± 13.868.4 ± 15.264.8 ± 11.6r = 0.86r = 0.63r = 0.64
CardioREPO
 EDV (mL)87.9 ± 35.682.8 ± 34.0110.6 ± 38.3r = 0.98r = 0.77r = 0.75
 ESV (mL)28.1 ± 22.627.0 ± 22.440.6 ± 26.7r = 0.98r = 0.78r = 0.77
 LVEF (%)69.5 ± 10.669.5 ± 11.064.8 ± 11.6r = 0.80r = 0.60r = 0.65
QGS (%)
 All LVEF65.4 ± 13.868.4 ± 15.264.8 ± 11.6P = 0.0002NSP = 0.019
 Small-heart LVEF75.0 ± 9.679.5 ± 8.370.1 ± 6.8P = 0.0005P = 0.0076P < 0.0001
CardioREPO (%)
 All LVEF69.5 ± 10.669.5 ± 11.064.8 ± 11.6NSP < 0.0001P < 0.0001
 Small-heart LVEF72.3 ± 9.074.3 ± 8.370.1 ± 6.8NSNSP = 0.0068
  • Conventional = conventional SPECT; echo = echocardiography; IQ = IQ•SPECT; NS = not statistically significant.

  • Data are mean ± SD.