JNMT
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online May 11, 2007
J Nucl Med Technol 2007, doi:10.2967/jnmt.106.036111
© 2007 by Society of Nuclear Medicine Technologist Section
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Publish Ahead of Print[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnmt.106.036111v1
35/2/96    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caglar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Karabulut, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caglar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Karabulut, E.

Inter- and Intraobserver Variability of 99mTc-DMSA Renal Scintigraphy: Impact of Oblique Views

Meltem Caglar 1*, Pinar Özgen Kiratli 1, and Erdem Karabulut 2

1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
2 Department of Biostatistics, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mcaglar{at}hacettepe.edu.tr.


   Abstract

99mTc-Dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scintigraphy is a frequently used diagnostic test to assess the presence and severity of cortical damage. The aim of this study is to investigate the variability in the interpretation of 99mTc-DMSA scans, evaluate the usefulness of oblique images, and assess their impact on scan interpretation. Methods: Two experienced nuclear medicine physicians independently interpreted 100 99mTc-DMSA scans (197 kidneys) 4 times. Interpretation was twice based on posterior projection images and twice based on posterior and posterior oblique projection images. For each kidney, the observers had to choose between the following results: normal, abnormal, and indeterminate. The indices of variability used were the percentage of agreement, {kappa}-statistic, and marginal homogeneity. Results: Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility ({kappa}-values) varied between 0.683 and 0.708 and between 0.609 and 0.671, respectively, for posterior images. Disagreement in 99mTc-DMSA scan interpretation occurred in 18% of kidneys within observers and in 21% of kidneys between observers when only posterior images were used. Oblique views changed the interpretation in 14% and 11.5% of kidneys for the first and second observers, respectively. The use of oblique views increased the agreement rate within and between observers ({kappa}-values, 0.725-0.812 and 0.768-0.732, respectively; mean agreement, 86.5 and 87.25, respectively). Conclusion: Oblique views were found useful in approximately 13% of kidneys and affected inter- and intraobserver variability. Our results suggest that oblique views should be used routinely in children with clinically suspected urinary tract infection to reliably interpret images.

Key Words: DMSA, scintigraphy, observer variability







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY
Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine Technologist Section.