Skip to main content
  • Main menu
  • User menu
  • Search
  • English ▼
    • English
    • Afrikaans
    • Albanian
    • Amharic
    • Arabic
    • Armenian
    • Azerbaijani
    • Basque
    • Belarusian
    • Bengali
    • Bosnian
    • Bulgarian
    • Catalan
    • Cebuano
    • Chichewa
    • Chinese (Simplified)
    • Chinese (Traditional)
    • Corsican
    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Danish
    • Dutch
    • Esperanto
    • Estonian
    • Filipino
    • Finnish
    • French
    • Frisian
    • Galician
    • Georgian
    • German
    • Greek
    • Gujarati
    • Haitian Creole
    • Hausa
    • Hawaiian
    • Hebrew
    • Hindi
    • Hmong
    • Hungarian
    • Icelandic
    • Igbo
    • Indonesian
    • Irish
    • Italian
    • Japanese
    • Javanese
    • Kannada
    • Kazakh
    • Khmer
    • Korean
    • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
    • Kyrgyz
    • Lao
    • Latin
    • Latvian
    • Lithuanian
    • Luxembourgish
    • Macedonian
    • Malagasy
    • Malay
    • Malayalam
    • Maltese
    • Maori
    • Marathi
    • Mongolian
    • Myanmar (Burmese)
    • Nepali
    • Norwegian
    • Pashto
    • Persian
    • Polish
    • Portuguese
    • Punjabi
    • Romanian
    • Russian
    • Samoan
    • Scottish Gaelic
    • Serbian
    • Sesotho
    • Shona
    • Sindhi
    • Sinhala
    • Slovak
    • Slovenian
    • Somali
    • Spanish
    • Sudanese
    • Swahili
    • Swedish
    • Tajik
    • Tamil
    • Telugu
    • Thai
    • Turkish
    • Ukrainian
    • Urdu
    • Uzbek
    • Vietnamese
    • Welsh
    • Xhosa
    • Yiddish
    • Yoruba
    • Zulu

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

English ▼
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scottish Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sudanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Research ArticleImaging

α-Labeling of J591, an Antibody Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen: The Technique and Considerations from the First Dedicated Production Lab at an Academic Institution in the United States

Kritika Subramanian, Judith Stangl-Kremser, Lady Sawoszczyk, Vasilios Avlonitis, Andrew Gernerd, Kyla Nixon, Michael Zgaljardic, Scott Tagawa, Neil Bander and Joseph R. Osborne
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology September 2023, 51 (3) 215-219; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.122.265166
Kritika Subramanian
1Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Judith Stangl-Kremser
2Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lady Sawoszczyk
1Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vasilios Avlonitis
1Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Gernerd
1Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyla Nixon
1Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Zgaljardic
3Department of Medical Health Physics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott Tagawa
4Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neil Bander
2Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph R. Osborne
1Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

The protein expression of the prostate-specific membrane antigen correlates with unfavorable or aggressive histologic features of prostate cancer, resulting in use as a diagnostic PET imaging radiotracer and therapeutic target. Here, we discuss the methods to develop 225Ac-DOTA-J591, an α-labeled compound targeting an extracellular epitope of prostate-specific membrane antigen, which is currently being studied in early clinical trials. In addition, we review quality control, radiation safety measures, and clinical considerations before administration of this radioimmunotherapeutic agent.

  • radiochemistry
  • radionuclide therapy
  • radiopharmaceuticals
  • 225Ac
  • PSMA
  • α-particle

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a multifunctional transmembrane protein expressed on the surface of prostate cancer cells. Protein expression levels are higher in poorly differentiated carcinomas and metastases (1–3). Receptor binding induces internalization of the ligand into the tumor cell (4). Hence, PSMA is an optimal target for both prostate cancer imaging and therapeutic intervention. At our institution, we have an investigational-new-drug application (application 11,613) for radiolabeled J591 with β-emitters. This humanized monoclonal antibody (mAb) has been demonstrated to be safe and efficacious in phase I and II clinical trials (NCT001950039 and NCT03276572) (5–8). To date, the only Food and Drug Administration–approved PSMA-targeted therapy is 177Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan (Pluvicto; Advanced Accelerator Applications) as third-line therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (9).

Unlike β-emitters, α-emitters characterized by high energy (5–9 MeV) (10) and a short pathlength (50–100 mm (10) and ∼100 μm in tissue (11)) have demonstrated anticancer potential by reducing tumor burden and serum prostate-specific antigen levels (12–15). The prototypical α-emitting particle used for radiotherapeutics is 225Ac, which has a half-life of 10 d (10).

Currently, a phase I dose-escalation trial of 225Ac-DOTA-J591 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is under way (7), with promising preliminary results (7,8). In this work, we present methods for producing this radioimmunotherapeutic, particularly in the context of implementation in the first dedicated α-labeling lab at an academic institution. We discuss technical and production details, quality control tests, radiation safety measures, and therapeutic administration considerations.

TECHNICAL AND PRODUCTION DETAILS

Biochemistry of 225Ac-DOTA-HuJ591

In essence, HuJ591 is conjugated with a DOTA bifunctional chelating agent that undergoes radiolabeling with 225Ac-nitrate. This IgG1 with humanized VH and VL regions specifically targets the extracellular domain of PSMA. 225Ac-DOTA-HuJ591 has a molecular weight of about 147 kDa and is formulated as a single-dose intravenous injection in a sterile, pyrogen-free isotonic saline solution.

Production Assembly Steps

A 37 MBq (1.0 mCi) activity of 225Ac-nitrate residue is supplied in a 2-mL glass vial (Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory). Figure 1 summarizes the production assembly mechanism.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Steps for production assembly of 225Ac-J591. DG = durable grade; DTPA = diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid; FDP = final drug product; HSA = human serum albumin; SDP = sterile drug product; SWFI = sterile water for injection; TMAA = triethylammonium acetate.

A 30-mL 10 durable grade (10 DG) desalting disposable column is washed twice with 15 mL of 3% hydrogen peroxide in a laminar flow hood. Thirty minutes later, the column is washed twice with 15 mL of sterile water for injection and twice with sterile 0.9% saline with 2% human serum albumin. This column is prepared for purification of the radiolabeled mAb. Within the same laminar flow hood, a 20-gauge sterile needle is attached to a 0.2-μm sterile filter and inserted into a pyrogen-free sterile drug product vial and the final drug product vial.

Using aseptic technique in a laminar flow hood, 100 μL of 0.2 M hydrogen chloride are added to the 225Ac vial for 30 min; 3,700–5,550 kBq (100–550 μCi) are removed and added to the reaction vial; and 75–125 μL of 2 M triethylammonium acetate buffer, 25 ± 5 μL of ascorbic acid, and 3 mg of DOTA-HuJ591 mAb (300 ± 15 μL) are subsequently added to the vial. The DOTA labeling of the HuJ591 mAb is performed at an outside facility. After gentle mixing of the vial, it is incubated at 37°C for 1–2 h. Instant thin-layer chromatography with silica gel is performed to determine labeling efficiency, which must be more than 50% to be acceptable for further processing.

Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid solution, 50 μL, is added to the vial and incubated for an additional 10 min at 37°C. The reaction mixture is loaded onto the prepared desalting column, and the eluate is collected into a sterile vial (fraction 1). The reaction vial is rinsed with 1.5 mL of 2% human serum albumin in sterile saline and reloaded in the column, and the eluate in the fraction 1 vial is collected. Fraction 2 is eluted with 4 mL of sterile saline with 2% human serum albumin into a sterile tube. Using a sterile syringe, 4 mL of fraction 2 are removed and transferred through a sterile filter into the final drug product vial. The filter is rinsed with 1.0 mL of saline–human serum albumin solution. The activity of 225Ac-DOTA-HuJ591 mAb over the next 6–8 h is measured at intervals of 1–2 h.

The 225Ac-DOTA-J591 mAb injection is stored in a 10-mL sterilized vial sealed with gray butyl rubber septa crimped closed with an aluminum stopper (Hollister Stier Laboratories or Allergy Laboratories) and certified as sterile and apyrogenic.

QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE TESTING

Each batch of the drug product produces 1–2 doses of 225Ac-DOTA-HuJ591 mAb injection. Before administration, several quality control and quality assurance tests are performed and assembled in a report to ensure that each batch meets the institutional acceptance criteria for batch release (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Acceptance Criteria for Batch Release

The final drug product must be colorless after being swirled in the glass vial, suggesting no contamination. Instant thin-layer chromatography with silica gel and 10 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution determines the radiochemical purity of the drug batch, which must be more than 95% (Fig. 2). The labeling efficiency before ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid elution is remarkable for a high concentration of 225Ac bound to protein and a small percentage of unbound 225Ac. Unbound 225Ac will decay to 218Fr and 440Bi daughter compounds, the greatest concentration of which appear at 2 h after elusion. Because of the shorter half-lives of the daughter compounds, their levels are negligible at 24 h after elusion. Figure 3 provides a schematic explanation of 225Ac decay.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Labeling efficiency and radiochemical purity measured using instant thin-layer chromatography. (A) Labeling efficiency before ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid elusion, remarkable for high concentration of 225Ac bound to protein (green peak) and small percentage of unbound 225Ac, which has formed into daughter compounds of francium and bismuth (red peaks). (B and C) Radiochemical purity after ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid elusion at 2 h (B) and 24 h (C). Two hours after elusion, higher concentration of daughter compounds is noted whereas peak concentration of 225Ac bound to protein is stable. Because of shorter half-lives of daughter compounds, their presence is negligible at 24 h after elution, validating chemical purity of final product.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Schematic diagram of 225Ac decay and daughter compounds.

The radionuclide concentration is measured with a dose calibrator. The pH is measured by placing 2–5 μL of aliquot on pH indicator paper. The specific activity is estimated through dose calibrator measurement of total activity relative to the 3 mg of the precursor DOTA-HuJ591 used. Endotoxin content is measured using the Endosafe-PTS system (Charles River) according to manufacturer’s operation manual, with a goal of not exceeding 175 endotoxin units for the entire 5-mL batch of the final drug product (35 endotoxin units/mL) (Fig. 4).

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Endosafe-PTS test record. Endotoxin content should demonstrate limit well within guidelines of 175 endotoxin units for entire batch, as demonstrated here. Cal = calibration; CV = coefficient of variation; Rxn = reaction; Sec = seconds.

The bubble point test in a nondestructive test evaluating filter integrity. It determines the minimum pressure required to force liquid out of the filter pores, which is an indirect way of measuring the pore diameter and, in essence, any defects in the filter that may permit bacterial penetration. The pressure at which bubbles appear must be greater than the minimum acceptable bubble point pressure as defined by the manufacturer. Fluid thioglycolate medium and soybean casein digest medium were used to evaluate the sterility of the injection drug product by transferring 0.1-mL samples of 225Ac-DOTA-J591 to the medium and incubating either at 37°C (fluid thioglycolate medium) or at room temperature (soybean casein digest medium) up to 14 d. Growth in the medium through visual inspection is recorded on the third, seventh, and 14th days after culturing.

225Ac-J591 can be stored at 4°C–8°C for up to 4 h after production, which also represents the time window for therapeutic use of the produced dose.

RADIATION SAFETY

Lead-shielded waste containers and sharps disposal containers should be close to where the 225Ac work is performed. A spill kit must be present in the room. An absorbent pad must be placed under the production and distribution area for 225Ac, including the laminar hood and glove box. Gloves, booties, and gowns must be worn by staff during production. Gloves should be changed frequently and placed in a leaded waste container.

If the staff needs to leave the room, their feet and hands must be checked using a survey meter (e.g., Ludlum model 14C). Similarly, when tagging is complete, the hands, feet, and body of each individual need to be evaluated for radiation contamination. If there is evidence of contamination, the survey meter should be used to check the area. Also, equipment used for tagging must be checked for contamination after each use. If contamination is found, the area must be decontaminated and checked to ensure that radiation is at background levels. Additionally, a wipe test must be done weekly using a γ-counter following a survey map.

THERAPEUTIC ADMINISTRATION CONSIDERATIONS

The equipment needed is a 50-mL 0.9% sterile sodium chloride infusion bag, sterile Alaris tubing intravenous sets (with a clamp to regulate or stop flow), two 3-way stopcocks, a spinal needle, an 18-gauge needle, a peristaltic infusion Alaris pump, and clamps. The spinal needle and 18-gauge needle are inserted into the therapeutic vial. The spinal needle is connected to intravenous tubing within the infusion pump. The output of the intravenous tubing is connected to a 3-way stopcock and then to the patient’s intravenous line. The 18-gauge needle is connected to the 50-mL 0.9% sterile sodium chloride infusion bag via a 3-way stopcock (which remains clamped until the end of the infusion).

The pump is set to 250 mL/h at the beginning of the administration. Within 10 min, the therapy vial solution is nearly empty. A saline rinse is begun by unclamping the 50-mL 0.9% sterile sodium chloride infusion bag. The rinse helps remove the solution from the vial and all lines to optimize dose delivery by minimizing residual agents in the equipment.

CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Current guidelines require that individuals with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have refractory disease or are unwilling to undergo other commercially available prostate cancer therapies should be considered for experimental treatment with 225Ac-J591. 225Ac-J591 is metabolized by the liver, as well as excreted by the kidney and the bowel. Therefore, baseline serologies evaluating hepatic and renal function must be reviewed before administration of the radioimmunotherapeutic agent. Not much uptake is seen in the marrow by default, but it is imperative to also review blood counts. PSMA PET/CT imaging may also be used to evaluate the baseline tumor burden before administration of the 225Ac-J591 (45 kBq/kg). After the treatment course, currently performed at our institution as 2 sessions 6 wk apart, repeat imaging helps guide clinicians in planning further management (Fig. 5).

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

PSMA PET imaging demonstrating good response in this patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer at baseline (B) and after receiving 2 sessions of 225Ac-J591 (A). Marked decrease in metastatic disease burden is demonstrated in maximum-intensity-projection images, particularly in subcarinal lymph node (column 2) and osseous lesions (column 3).

DISCUSSION

In this paper we have explained an optimized technique that meets all federal recommendations and safety guidelines for producing 225Ac-DOTA-HuJ591 at an academic institution. In addition, we have discussed the clinical considerations before therapeutic administration. Multiple considerations involving safety precautions must be taken to ensure that radiation exposure to the staff is minimalized. In addition, several quality control tests must be performed on each production batch to ensure that there is no compromise in the quality of the radioimmunotherapeutic.

Numerous benefits are associated with the production of α-emitting radioligand therapy at the administering institution. There are no delays associated with outside manufacturing and delivery, thereby reducing logistic expenses. The measures for quality control indicated on the quality assurance reports are reassuring to the administering and treating physicians. Individuals may receive their therapeutic administration and subsequent imaging with a PSMA-bound PET tracer at the same institution, allowing for enhanced, personalized patient care.

Currently, our α-theranostics laboratory produces solely 225Ac-DOTA-HuJ591. However, with time, more actinium-bound radioligand therapies may be incorporated into the portfolio for application in a wider range of malignancies.

CONCLUSION

This paper provides the assembly methods for local production of 225Ac-DOTA-HuJ591 at an academic institution, for which there are many considerations and advantages.

KEY POINTS

QUESTION: What are the considerations in developing an α-labeled compound targeting PSMA?

PERTINENT FINDINGS: This paper discusses quality control, radiation safety measures, and clinical considerations before administration of 225Ac-DOTA-HuJ591.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: Reduced logistic expenses and enhanced quality control measures by the administering institution reassure the treating physician and the patient on the quality of the radioimmunotherapeutic being administered. Imaging can also be performed at the same institution as the administration, enhancing patient care.

DISCLOSURE

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Dr. Shankar Vallabhajosula for his guidance on developing the methods and implementing them at our institution.

Footnotes

  • Published online Apr. 25, 2023.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Wright GL,
    2. Haley C,
    3. Beckett ML,
    4. Schellhammer PF
    . Expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen in normal, benign, and malignant prostate tissues. Urol Oncol. 1995;1:18–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    1. Ross JS,
    2. Sheehan CE,
    3. Fisher HAG,
    4. et al
    . Correlation of primary tumor prostate-specific membrane antigen expression with disease recurrence in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:6357–6362.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.↵
    1. Sweat SD,
    2. Pacelli A,
    3. Murphy GP,
    4. Bostwick DG
    . Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression is greatest in prostate adenocarcinoma and lymph node metastases. Urology. 1998;52:637–640.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.↵
    1. Liu H,
    2. Rajasekaran AK,
    3. Moy P,
    4. et al
    . Constitutive and antibody-induced internalization of prostate-specific membrane antigen. Cancer Res. 1998;58:4055–4060.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bander NH,
    2. Milowsky MI,
    3. Nanus DM,
    4. Kostakoglu L,
    5. Vallabhajosula S,
    6. Goldsmith SJ
    . Phase I trial of 177lutetium-labeled J591, a monoclonal antibody to prostate-specific membrane antigen, in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4591–4601.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    1. Tagawa ST,
    2. Milowsky MI,
    3. Morris M,
    4. et al
    . Phase II study of lutetium-177-labeled anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen monoclonal antibody J591 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:5182–5191.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.↵
    1. Tagawa ST,
    2. Vallabhajosula S,
    3. Jhanwar Y,
    4. et al
    . Phase I dose-escalation study of 225Ac-J591 for progressive metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) [abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(suppl):TPS399.
    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.↵
    1. Sun M,
    2. Nauseef JT,
    3. Lebenthal JM,
    4. et al
    . A phase I/II dose-escalation study of fractionated and multiple dose 225Ac-J591 for progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) [abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl):TPS188.
    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.↵
    1. Sartor O,
    2. de Bono J,
    3. Chi KN,
    4. et al
    . Lutetium-177–PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1091–1103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.↵
    1. Poty S,
    2. Francesconi LC,
    3. McDevitt MR,
    4. Morris MJ,
    5. Lewis JS
    . α-emitters for radiotherapy: from basic radiochemistry to clinical studies—part 1. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:878–884.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.↵
    1. Elgqvist J,
    2. Frost S,
    3. Pouget J-P,
    4. Albertsson P
    . The potential and hurdles of targeted alpha therapy: clinical trials and beyond. Front Oncol. 2014;3:324.
    Google Scholar
  12. 12.↵
    1. Parker C,
    2. Nilsson S,
    3. Heinrich D,
    4. et al
    . Alpha emitter radium-223 and survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:213–223.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    1. Nilsson S,
    2. Franzén L,
    3. Parker C,
    4. et al
    . Bone-targeted radium-223 in symptomatic, hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase II study. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:587–594.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    1. Parker CC,
    2. Pascoe S,
    3. Chodacki A,
    4. et al
    . A randomized, double-blind, dose-finding, multicenter, phase 2 study of radium chloride (Ra 223) in patients with bone metastases and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2013;63:189–197.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.↵
    1. Nilsson S,
    2. Strang P,
    3. Aksnes AK,
    4. et al
    . A randomized, dose–response, multicenter phase II study of radium-223 chloride for the palliation of painful bone metastases in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:678–686.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Received for publication November 11, 2022.
  • Revision received February 12, 2023.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 51 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 51, Issue 3
September 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Share
α-Labeling of J591, an Antibody Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen: The Technique and Considerations from the First Dedicated Production Lab at an Academic Institution in the United States
Kritika Subramanian, Judith Stangl-Kremser, Lady Sawoszczyk, Vasilios Avlonitis, Andrew Gernerd, Kyla Nixon, Michael Zgaljardic, Scott Tagawa, Neil Bander, Joseph R. Osborne
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2023, 51 (3) 215-219; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.122.265166
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • TECHNICAL AND PRODUCTION DETAILS
    • QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE TESTING
    • RADIATION SAFETY
    • THERAPEUTIC ADMINISTRATION CONSIDERATIONS
    • CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Does Arthrography Improve Accuracy of SPECT/CT for Diagnosis of Aseptic Loosening in Patients with Painful Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • radiochemistry
  • Radionuclide Therapy
  • radiopharmaceuticals
  • 225Ac
  • PSMA
  • α-particle
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire
Alerts for this Article
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email this Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
α-Labeling of J591, an Antibody Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen: The Technique and Considerations from the First Dedicated Production Lab at an Academic Institution in the United States
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
α-Labeling of J591, an Antibody Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen: The Technique and Considerations from the First Dedicated Production Lab at an Academic Institution in the United States
Kritika Subramanian, Judith Stangl-Kremser, Lady Sawoszczyk, Vasilios Avlonitis, Andrew Gernerd, Kyla Nixon, Michael Zgaljardic, Scott Tagawa, Neil Bander, Joseph R. Osborne
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2023, 51 (3) 215-219; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.122.265166

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience

By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.