Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
OtherIMAGING

Testing Different Storage Conditions for 99mTc-MAG3 Kit: Can Hot Fractioning Reduce the Cost per Unit Dose?

Pınar Özgen Kıratlı and Bilge Volkan Salancı
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology June 2003, 31 (2) 74-75;
Pınar Özgen Kıratlı
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bilge Volkan Salancı
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Since its release for routine clinical use, 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) has become an important alternative to 131I-labeled orthoiodohippuran. The cold kit for MAG3 is expensive, especially in developing countries. Therefore, unique storage conditions should be provided for cost reduction. Cold fractioning is a well-known procedure but has special requirements, such as a nitrogen tank and a laminar flow hood. The aim of this study was to prolong the shelf life of 99mTc-labeled MAG3 by a hot fractioning method, which separates the patient doses after 99mTc labeling. The radiochemical purity of the 99mTc-labeled MAG3 kit was tested under different storage conditions. Hot fractioning of the 99mTc-labeled MAG3 kit was found to be a possible alternative to cold fractioning for routine clinical studies.

  • 99mTc-MAG3, cost reduction
  • fractioning

Since 1986, 99mTc-MAG3 has been in routine clinical use (1). The better physical properties of 99mTc on image quality and the lower patient dose have made 99mTc-labeled MAG3 a preferred alternative to 131I-hippuran in the evaluation of renal tubular function. However, the cold kit for MAG3 is quite expensive worldwide, especially in tertiary countries. The physical shelf life of 99mTc-labeled MAG3 is quite short (4 h), and gamma camera dynamics limit the number of patients for renal scanning. These factors also restrict the effective use of the labeled kit and increase the cost per unit dose.

Cold kit fractioning and improvement of storage conditions after labeling are common methods for cost reduction of MAG3 (1). A longer shelf life after labeling with 99mTc increases the number of renal studies that can be performed.

The objective of this study was to present a simple alternative procedure, which we term hot fractioning, to reduce the expense of the MAG3 kit (ROTOP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

99mTc was obtained from a 16-GBq generator (Elumatic III; CIS Bio International) and was tested for the presence of aluminum ion by a Tec-Control system (Biodex Medical) and 99mMo breakthrough.

The MAG3 kit was labeled with 99mTc by following the instructions on the ROTOP MAG3 package insert. A maximum dose of 2,500 MBq of 99mTc in a 2-mL volume was used for labeling. The MAG3 kit from ROTOP does not require heating, which is a critical step in the transchelation process for preparation. The kit formulation contains 2 vials. Vial 1 comprises 0.20 mg of MAG3, 0.06 mg of zinc (II) chloride dihydrate, and 22 mg of dinatrium tartrate dihydrate. Vial 2, 2.5 mL of sodium phosphate buffer solution, comprises 14.4 mg of sodium monohydrogen phosphate dihydrate, 2.65 mg of sodium dihydrogen phosphate monohydrate, and 1 mL of water. Ten minutes after the 99mTc and MAG3 were mixed, 2 mL of buffer solution were added. The final solution was incubated another 10 min at room temperature (24°C).

To test different storage conditions, 3 groups of samples (groups A, B, and C) were prepared. Each sample contained 0.2 mL of 99mTc-MAG3 solution. The samples were taken by gauge syringes after labeling with 99mTc and were stored in the dark at different storage temperatures. Group A was stored at room temperature, group B at 4°C, and group C at −20°C. Each group consisted of 1 sample for each of 4 different intervals: 0, 5, 8, and 24 h.

Radiochemical purity (RCP) was determined by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) at 0, 5, 8, and 24 h for each group, and the results were compared with 0-h RCP values. At least 2 TLC tests were performed for every sample. Samples of groups B and C were left at room temperature for 5–10 min before RCP testing. For RCP testing, a 2-strip TLC method was used for all groups. In this method, one 10 × 1 cm instant TLC-silica gel (ITLC-SG) strip was developed in methylethylketone:acetoacetate solution (2:3) to a distance of 8–10 cm, and a second strip was developed in acetonitrile:water solution (1:1). Additionally, a mini-strip Tec-Control system was used for these groups. In this method, an ITLC-SG strip was developed in chloroform:tetrahydrofurane (3:2) and acetone. RCP results that had binding ratios lower than 90% were considered invalid.

RESULTS

RCP Results for Group A.

Samples taken after labeling with 99mTc were stored at room temperature. RCP testing was performed using the Tec-Control system and the 2-strip TLC method at 0, 5, 8, and 24 h. RCP testing using both methods revealed similar results. The binding ratio for 0 h was 99.7%. The mean binding ratios (±SD) at 5, 8, and 24 h were 92.1% ± 1.3%, 80.0% ± 0.85%, and 65.0% ± 4.0%, respectively.

RCP Results for Group B.

These samples were stored at 4°C and incubated at room temperature for 5–10 min before RCP testing. The RCP result for 0 h was 96.6%. The mean binding ratios (±SD) at 5, 8, and 24 h were 93.9% ± 2.5%, 86.6% ± 7.8%, and 79.1% ± 7.1% with the 2-strip TLC method and the Tec-Control system.

RCP Results for Group C.

The samples, which had a binding ratio of 99.2% for 0 h, were stored at −20°C and left at room temperature for 5–10 min before RCP testing. The Tec-Control system RCP results for these samples were 97.25% ± 2.48%, 97.8% ± 2.09%, and 95.5% ± 1.81% at 5, 8, and 24 h, respectively. RCP testing using the 2-strip TLC method and the Tec-Control system revealed similar results for 0, 5, 8, and 24 h.

DISCUSSION

99mTc-MAG3 was released for routine clinical use in 1986 (1). The ROTOP MAG3 kit is labeled with a maximum dose of 2,500 MBq (67.6 mCi) of 99mTc, allowing approximately 14 ± 3 patient doses for renal scanning. The shelf life of MAG3 after labeling with 99mTc is 4 h if stored in the dark at 2°C−8°C. The physical use of 99mTc-MAG3 and the dynamics of the gamma camera limit the number of the patients to a maximum of 7 under the best conditions. These factors also prevent the use of MAG3 in emergency nuclear medicine.

To minimize the cost of the MAG3 kit, Thorson et al. introduced the cold fractioning method and demonstrated that split doses preserve RCP stability until the 28th day (2). In their work, they dissolved the lyophilized ingredients of MAG3 kits with nitrogen (N2)-purged saline, divided the solution into aliquot vials filled with N2, and stored the final aliquots frozen at −20°C. The major problem of this method is the age of the 99mTc eluate. When aged 99mTc eluate is used for labeling, RCP values decrease significantly (3). Another problem that limits the use of this method is the requirement for such equipment as a vertical laminar flow hood and a nitrogen tank. This requirement increases the expense. Moreover, the preparation procedure is too complicated for use in routine studies.

We have defined a method—termed hot fractioning—that separates 99mTc-labeled MAG3 patient doses and stores them at −20°C to reduce the expense of the MAG3 kit, and we tested the stability of the 99mTc-MAG3 under different storage conditions after fractioning. In group A, TLC quality control testing showed that acceptable results were obtained until up to 5 h of storage at room temperature. In group B, the 2 quality control tests were concordant, and since the binding ratios were below 90% for 8 and 24 h, we take this as invalid for clinical studies. In group C, the samples were stored at −20°C and the results showed that even at 24 h the binding ratios were greater than 90%. RCP values supported the hypothesis that stability is preserved longer if 99mTc-labeled MAG3 is stored under proper conditions.

Even though TLC revealed high binding values at 24 h, because of significant radioactive decay the authors do not recommend the use of 99mTc-MAG3 that has been stored at 4°C or −20°C for 24 h. In contrast, the pharmaceutical stored at 4 h at either temperature can safely be used in the clinical work-up.

Determination of the RCP of MAG3 is a point of question. So far, 3 methods have been recommended for this purpose: high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), TLC, and solid-phase extraction. Free pertechnetate and 99mTc-colloid are important radioimpurities that can also be identified by TLC. HPLC has been acknowledged to yield the most sensitive results in determining the RCP of MAG3; TLC, even though it overestimates the RCP, produces results that are within acceptable limits (4,5) and is still a valuable tool in most institutions.

After labeling with 99mTc, MAG3 has a longer shelf life that permits use in more patients, even patients being treated in the emergency room. Therefore, proper storage conditions are important for decreasing the cost per unit dose. A shelf life of 4–5 h can be obtained when the instructions of the MAG3 kit are followed. Prolongation of the shelf life to 8 h or even 24 h is possible. Although the RCP results at 24 h were still acceptable, the administration of such 99mTc-labeled radiopharmaceuticals is not recommended because of the half-life of 99mTc (6 h). After obtaining high RCP results, we applied to some patients 99mTc-MAG3 stored at −20°C for up to 9 h, and we observed no liver uptake or thyroid gland visualization.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that hot fractioning of the MAG3 kit (after labeling with 99mTc) allows its use until up to 8–9 h, is quite simple, and does not require specially trained personnel.

Footnotes

  • For correspondence or reprints contact: Pınar Özgen Kıratlı, MD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical Center, 06100 Sıhhıye, Ankara, Turkey.

    E-mail: pkiratli{at}hacettepe.edu.tr.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Taylor A, Eshima D, Fritzberg AR, et al. Comparison of iodine-131 OIH and technetium-99m MAG3 renal imaging in volunteers. J Nucl Med. 1986;27:795–803.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Thorson LM, Hung JC, Hollar BS. Feasibility of fractioning MAG3 cold kit for cost reduction. Nucl Med Commun. 1992;13:832–837.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    Hung JC, Thorson LM. Effects of generator eluate age on the radiochemical purity of fractioned 99mTc-MAG3. Nucl Med Commun. 1995;16:157–160.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    Murray T, McKellar K, Owens J, et al. 99mTc MAG3: problems with radiochemical purity testing. Nucl Med Commun. 2000;21:71–75.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    Chen F, Decristoforo C, Rohrbacher B, et al. A simple two strip method to determine the radiochemical purity of technetium-99m mercaptoacetyltriglycine. Eur J Nucl Med. 1993;20:334–338.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 31 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 31, Issue 2
June 1, 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Testing Different Storage Conditions for 99mTc-MAG3 Kit: Can Hot Fractioning Reduce the Cost per Unit Dose?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Testing Different Storage Conditions for 99mTc-MAG3 Kit: Can Hot Fractioning Reduce the Cost per Unit Dose?
Pınar Özgen Kıratlı, Bilge Volkan Salancı
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2003, 31 (2) 74-75;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Testing Different Storage Conditions for 99mTc-MAG3 Kit: Can Hot Fractioning Reduce the Cost per Unit Dose?
Pınar Özgen Kıratlı, Bilge Volkan Salancı
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2003, 31 (2) 74-75;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Does Arthrography Improve Accuracy of SPECT/CT for Diagnosis of Aseptic Loosening in Patients with Painful Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire