JNMT
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

First published online May 11, 2007, 10.2967/jnmt.106.036129
doi:10.2967/jnmt.106.036129
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nair, N.
Right arrow Articles by Jaiswar, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nair, N.
Right arrow Articles by Jaiswar, R.

Substitution of Oral 18F-FDG for Intravenous 18F-FDG in PET Scanning

Narendra Nair, Archi Agrawal and Rajnath Jaiswar

Radiation Medicine Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital Annexe, Parel, Mumbai, India


Figure 1
View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 1.  Patient 1, 59-y-old man with right lung carcinoma. Both intravenous (A) and oral (B) studies show right-mid-zone mass and right hilar lymph node. MIP = maximum intensity projection.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 2.  Patient 2, 60-y-old man with right lung carcinoma and multiple skeletal metastases. Both intravenous (A) and oral (B) studies show right-upper-lobe lesion, with metastases in vertebrae, right shoulder, pelvic bone, and both femurs. MIP = maximum intensity projection.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 3.  Patient 3, 47-y-old man with left lung carcinoma. Also seen are mediastinal lymph nodes and bilateral adrenal metastases. The lesions match on both intravenous (A) and oral (B) studies. MIP = maximum intensity projection.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 4.  Patient 5, 55-y-old woman with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma after treatment. Intravenous study (A) shows tiny right axillary lymph nodes, which are identifiable on oral study too (B). MIP = maximum intensity projection.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 5.  Patient 6, 45-y-old woman in whom myocardial viability was being assessed. Both intravenous (A) and oral (B) studies show similar results. MIP = maximum intensity projection.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 6.  Patient 7, 16-y-old girl with solitary thyroid nodule in right lobe. 18F-FDG uptake is seen on both intravenous (A) and oral (B) studies. MIP = maximum intensity projection.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY
Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine Technologist Section.