FIGURE 2. BlandAltman analysis of mean of stress/rest matched pairs vs. EF shows no trend toward under- or overestimation of stress EF. Mean stress EF was 56.3%, mean rest EF was 56.9%, and mean difference in EF indicated by solid horizontal line was 0.65%. Outer dashed lines represent 95% limits of agreement, whereas inner dotted lines represent 95% CI of EF difference.
FIGURE 3. Bivariate fit of transient dilatation and EF demonstrates weak negative correlation suggesting negative EF may be associated with prolonged poststress transient dilatation.
FIGURE 4. One-way ANOVA of transient dilatation by stress method demonstrating, despite small overlap of 95% CIs (diamonds), a statistically significant difference between mean transient dilatation for exercise stress and combined exercise/persantin compared with persantin stress (P = 0.02).
FIGURE 5. One-way ANOVA of transient dilatation by scintigraphic findings demonstrating overlap of 95% CIs (diamonds) and no statistically significant difference between mean transient dilatation across scintigraphic findings (P = 0.07) despite the higher mean score of the reversible category.