JNMT
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Activity
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenthal, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosenthal, M. S.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Volume 34, Number 3, 2006 143-150
© 2006 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

Patient Misconceptions and Ethical Challenges in Radioactive Iodine Scanning and Therapy*

M. Sara Rosenthal

Program for Bioethics and Patients' Rights, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: M. Sara Rosenthal, PhD, Program for Bioethics and Patients' Rights, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 131 College of Medicine Office Bldg., Lexington, KY 40536-0086. E-mail: msrose2{at}uky.edu

ABSTRACT

The use and nature of radioactive iodine (RAI) are complex topics for patients with thyroid conditions to understand. Fear and anxiety over its use, misinformation in patient advocacy books and on the Internet, medical jargon, confusion regarding postscanning and posttreatment procedures, patient literacy, thyroid health status, and several other socioeconomic factors can create serious barriers to genuine informed consent in RAI scanning and treatment. The following discussion will review the origins of patient misconceptions and misinterpretations, including international differences in physician attitudes regarding RAI usage. Next, this article will present the core ethical duties, problems, and moral dilemmas that can arise in the RAI setting. Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to describe the core ethical principles of respect for persons (patient autonomy), beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice; describe the 3 components of informed consent; identify common barriers to informed consent and describe how such barriers can lead to misconceptions, misinformation, and refusal of treatment with RAI; and summarize where RAI candidates and patients first look for information and identify the common ways in which misinformation surfaces.

Key Words: radioactive iodine; thyroid; patient misconceptions; ethical challenges; bioethics; informed consent







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY
Copyright © 2006 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine Technologist Section.