JNMT
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Narabayashi, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Narabayashi, I.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Volume 33, Number 4, 2005 224-229
© 2005 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

Comparison of Methods of Attenuation and Scatter Correction in Brain Perfusion SPECT

Masuo Hayashi1, Jun Deguchi, MD, PhD2, Keita Utsunomiya, MD, PhD1, Makoto Yamada, MD2, Tsuyoshi Komori, MD, PhD1, Masayasu Takeuchi1, Kensei Kanna1 and Isamu Narabayashi, MD, PhD1

1 Department of Radiology, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan;
2 Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan

Objective: The radioactivity count distribution in the brain must be determined accurately to accurately measure cerebral blood flow (CBF). Scatter and attenuation are factors that compromise the accuracy of determining radioactivity counts in the brain.

Methods: We compared regional CBF in patients by an autoradiographic method using N-isopropyl-p-[123I] iodoamphetamine when, first, attenuation correction alone was performed uniformly on SPECT images by using empiric µ-values (Chang method); second, scatter correction was performed and the µ-values of a homogeneous-attenuation body of water were used for attenuation correction (triple-energy window [TEW] + Chang method); and third, scatter correction was performed and the µ-values calculated by CT were used for attenuation correction (TEW + CT method). We also compared regional CBF measured by these methods with the values obtained by the xenon CT/CBF method, which uses CT and stable xenon.

Results: Scatter correction reduced overestimation of regional CBF in low-flow regions. The TEW + CT method yielded better regional and overall correlations with the xenon CT/CBF method than did either of the other methods.

Conclusion: The TEW + CT method of correction gave the most accurate measurements of regional CBF.

Key Words: brain perfusion SPECT; autoradiography method; stable XeCT regional CBF measurement; scatter correction; attenuation correction




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
A. K. Buck, S. Nekolla, S. Ziegler, A. Beer, B. J. Krause, K. Herrmann, K. Scheidhauer, H.-J. Wester, E. J. Rummeny, M. Schwaiger, et al.
SPECT/CT
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 1305 - 1319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
P. Millet, C. Graf, M. Moulin, and V. Ibanez
SPECT Quantification of Benzodiazepine Receptor Concentration Using a Dual-Ligand Approach
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2006; 47(5): 783 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY
Copyright © 2005 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine Technologist Section.