JNMT
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Activity
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNMT
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sureshbabu, W.
Right arrow Articles by Mawlawi, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sureshbabu, W.
Right arrow Articles by Mawlawi, O.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Volume 33, Number 3, 2005 156-161
© 2005 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

PET/CT Imaging Artifacts*

Waheeda Sureshbabu, CNMT, PET1 and Osama Mawlawi, PhD2

1 Nuclear Medicine, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas;
2 Imaging Physics, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper is to introduce the principles of PET/CT imaging and describe the artifacts associated with it. PET/CT is a new imaging modality that integrates functional (PET) and structural (CT) information into a single scanning session, allowing excellent fusion of the PET and CT images and thus improving lesion localization and interpretation accuracy. Moreover, the CT data can also be used for attenuation correction, ultimately leading to high patient throughput. These combined advantages have rendered PET/CT a preferred imaging modality over dedicated PET. Although PET/CT imaging offers many advantages, this dual-modality imaging also poses some challenges. CT-based attenuation correction can induce artifacts and quantitative errors that can affect the PET emission images. For instance, the use of contrast medium and the presence of metallic implants can be associated with focal radiotracer uptake. Furthermore, the patient’s breathing can introduce mismatches between the CT attenuation map and the PET emission data, and the discrepancy between the CT and PET fields of view can lead to truncation artifacts. After reading this article, the technologist should be able to describe the principles of PET/CT imaging, identify at least 3 types of image artifacts, and describe the differences between PET/CT artifacts of different causes: metallic implants, respiratory motion, contrast medium, and truncation.

Key Words: PET/CT; attenuation correction; artifacts


Related articles in JNMT:

Technologists News

JNMT 2006 34: 188-190. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Yigla, M. Gat, J.-J. Meyer, P. J. Friedman, T. M. Maher, and J. M. Madison
Vibration Response Imaging Technology in Healthy Subjects
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3): 845 - 852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY
Copyright © 2005 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine Technologist Section.