JNMT
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Activity
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Groch, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Erwin, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Groch, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Erwin, W. D.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Volume 29, Number 1, 2001 12-18
© 2001 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


CONTINUING EDUCATION

Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography in the Year 2001: Instrumentation and Quality Control

Mark W. Groch and William D. Erwin

Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois, and Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois

Objective: SPECT instrumentation is more complex than that used for whole-body and planar imaging, and requires careful quality control to ensure optimum performance. Conventional and new hybrid SPECT imaging systems (coincidence and SPECT/CT) will be discussed. New imaging detector materials such as LSO and CZT will also be discussed, along with their potential advantages. Finally, basic SPECT quality control will be reviewed. After reading this article, the nuclear medicine technologist should be able to: (a) explain the use of single and multihead gamma cameras for SPECT imaging; (b) have an understanding of the potential of new hybrid SPECT imaging systems; (c) be aware of future developments in SPECT imaging technology; (d) understand the requirements for SPECT quality control, including field uniformity and center of rotation corrections; and (e) explain the benefits of using phantoms to augment SPECT quality control.

Key Words: SPECT; CT; instrumentation; quality control




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nucl. Med. Technol.Home page
S. Burrell and A. MacDonald
Artifacts and Pitfalls in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
J. Nucl. Med. Technol., December 1, 2006; 34(4): 193 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Wintermark, M. Sesay, E. Barbier, K. Borbely, W. P. Dillon, J. D. Eastwood, T. C. Glenn, C. B. Grandin, S. Pedraza, J.-F. Soustiel, et al.
Comparative Overview of Brain Perfusion Imaging Techniques
Stroke, September 1, 2005; 36(9): e83 - e99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
C Anagnostopoulos, M Harbinson, A Kelion, K Kundley, C Y Loong, A Notghi, E Reyes, W Tindale, and S R Underwood
Procedure guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging
Heart, January 1, 2004; 90(90001): i1 - 10.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine Technologist Section.