HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME Activity Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Groch, M. W. Articles by Erwin, W. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Groch, M. W. Articles by Erwin, W. D.

SPECT in the Year 2000: Basic Principles

Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, and Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois

Objective: SPECT has become a routine procedure in most nuclear medicine departments. SPECT provides significant technical challenges for the nuclear medicine technologist, as compared with planar imaging, in the areas of SPECT acquisition, image reconstruction, and data processing. Many new advances in SPECT methodology are becoming available, such as iterative reconstruction, multimodality fusion, and advanced gated cardiac SPECT. SPECT imaging is demanding and requires careful attention to proper acquisition protocols, whether circular or noncircular orbits, and postprocessing is becoming more complex with the addition of iterative reconstruction and attenuation correction algorithms, among others. Understanding the principles of SPECT is essential not only to produce the highest quality scans but also to identify image artifacts. After reading this article, the nuclear medicine technologist should be able to: (a) describe the historical development and benefits of SPECT imaging; (b) state the impact of image matrix size, number of projections, and arc of rotation on final SPECT image quality; (c) discuss the trade-offs between image noise content and spatial and contrast resolution in SPECT reconstruction; (d) discuss SPECT filters and their impact on image quality; (e) explain the differences between filtered backprojection and iterative reconstruction; and (f) describe the impact of attenuation and scatter in SPECT imaging and the advantages and pitfalls of attenuation correction methods.

Key Words: single-photon emission computed tomography; SPECT filtering; iterative reconstruction; attenuation correction.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Accorsi Brain Single-Photon Emission CT Physics Principles AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2008; 29(7): 1247 - 1256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]