JNMT
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Heller, G. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Heller, G. V.

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, Vol 26, Issue 4 265-268, Copyright © 1998 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


ARTICLES

Evaluation of technetium-99m red blood cell labeling efficiency in adults receiving chemotherapy and the clinical impact on pediatric oncology patients

MP White, A Mann, DM Cross and GV Heller
Nuclear Cardiology Laboratory, Division of Cardiology, Hartford Hospital, Connecticut, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Technetium-99m-labeled RBCs are used to evaluate ventricular function and are the preferred method for monitoring the cardiac function of patients receiving chemotherapy. Optimal imaging quality is critical for monitoring small but important changes in ventricular function. The labeling efficiency of three products from two manufacturers and images from 30 patients (21 men, 9 women; age 60.3 +/- 11.9 yr) referred for clinical radionuclide ventriculograms before chemotherapy were evaluated to determine the best labeling technique. METHODS: Patients received RBCs labeled in one of three ways. Two pyrophosphate methods used a modified in vitro method and the manufacturer's instructions were used for the in vitro method. Imaging was performed and, upon completion (42.1 +/- 9.6 min), blood samples were drawn, separated and counted to determine labeling efficiency. RESULTS: The labeling efficiencies were: (a) 88.1% +/- 4.2% and (b) 88.4% +/- 4.8% for the two modified in vitro methods; and (c) 95.3% +/- 1.7% for the in vitro method. The difference between the methods was statistically significant (p = 0.019). Twenty pediatric oncology patients (6.4 +/- 5.2 yr) received in vitro labeled RBCs through their Hickman catheters. All 20 pediatric studies were of high quality. CONCLUSION: In vitro labeling demonstrated a higher labeling efficiency than the modified in vitro methods. In vitro labeling also yielded high-quality images when the labeled RBCs were injected through existing chronic in-dwelling catheters.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY
Copyright © 1998 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine Technologist Section.